Select Page

Tim Spencer

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 30 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Policy for hanging IV lines [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] #73394
    Tim Spencer
    Participant

    Author:
    Tim Spencer

    Position:

    Organisation:

    State:

    Hi Heather,The CDC Guidelines have quite bit on this issue also.https://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/pdf/guidelines/bsi-guidelines-2011.pdf
    Cath Murphy posted Dr Rickards paper in the BMJ which is also a great starting point.

    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert, VA-BC.Vascular Access ConsultantPresidential Advisor – Australian Vascular Access SocietyConjoint Lecturer – South West Sydney Clinical School | Faculty of Medicine | University of NSWDirector-at-Large – Vascular Access Certification Corporation (VACC)Chairperson – AVA GlobalStrategy CommitteeRepresentative – WoCoVA Global Strategic CommitteeM: +1 (623) 326 8889 (USA)M: +61 (0)409 463 428 (AU)E:tim.spencer68@icloud.com
    Sent from Outlook for iPhone

    _____________________________

    Dear colleagues

    Thank you for previous responses.

    Would any like to share if they have a policy/procedure for the hanging of IV lines?

    At the Canberra Hospital we had a policy for length of time an iv line could be used before needing to be changed but it seems to have dropped off.

    We have had the question from the wards regarding small infusions, eg antibiotics. Do the lines need to be changed with each new infusion?

    Also once a bag is spiked how long can the bag be hung before being used with and without additives.

    Kind regards

    Heather

    Heather Warfield

    Infection Prevention & Control

    Surgical site surveillance

    Canberra Hospital

    building 10, level 4

    Email:heather.warfield@act.gov.au

    ———————————————————————–
    This email, and any attachments, may be confidential and also privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this transmission along with any attachments immediately. You should not copy or use it for any purpose, nor disclose its contents to any other person.
    ———————————————————————–MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    in reply to: ePosters #73299
    Tim Spencer
    Participant

    Author:
    Tim Spencer

    Position:

    Organisation:

    State:

    HI Helen,
    Do you know if they standard or widescreen format – this is important if your template is not designed for either one..
    If you use a standard template in widescreen, its aspect ratio will be incorrect.. and it will appear stretched and disproportional.

    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert, VA-BC.
    Vascular Access Consultant
    E: tim.spencer68@icloud.com
    M: +1 (623) 326 8889 (USA)
    M: +61 (0)409 463 428 (AU)

    > On Aug 22, 2016, at 4:15 PM, Lorenz, Helen (Health) wrote:
    >
    > Hello all:
    >
    > Can anyone share some examples of ePosters? Ive had an abstract accepted as an ePoster presentation for the ACIPC 2016 conference and am looking at how the info is best displayed, but cant find much on the way of completed examples on the Internet. There are plenty of tips etc, but I would like to look at how a one minute long PPT format ePoster might look.
    >
    > Kind regards
    > Helen
    > Helen Lorenz RN BScN | Associate Clinical Service CALHN Coordinator Infection Prevention & Control Unit | Division of Acute Medicine The Queen Elizabeth Hospital | Central Adelaide Local Health Network Level 8 Tower Building | 28 Woodville Road, WOODVILLE SOUTH 5011 t: +61 8 8222 7588| p: 47758| f: +61 8 8222 6461 | DX: 465432 |e: Helen.Lorenz@sa.gov.au
    > This email may contain confidential information, which also may be legally privileged. Only the intended recipient(s) may access, use, distribute or copy this email. If this email is received in error, please inform the sender by return email and delete the original.
    >
    >
    > MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.
    > The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.
    >
    > Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.
    >
    > Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au
    > To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au .
    >
    > You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Tim Spencer
    Participant

    Author:
    Tim Spencer

    Position:

    Organisation:

    State:

    Hi Cath,
    Sorry for the delay in replying to your email – I was work traveling.

    The current INS Standards of Practice (2016), with which a lot of infusion therapy-based policies currently reference, considers a burette as an add-on device and the requirements for these are listed in the extracted text below;

    Practice Criteria

    Consider the use of add-on devices (eg, single- and multilumen extension sets, manifold sets, extension loops, solid cannula caps, needleless connectors, in- line filters, manual flow-control devices and stop- cocks) only for clinical indications. When indicated, preferentially use systems that minimize manipula- tion and reduce multiple components, such as inte- grated extension sets (see Standard 34, Needleless Connectors).1-4 (IV)

    Clinical indications may include adding length, enabling filtration capabilities, or enhancing function of the infusion system (ie, adding an extension to decrease movement/manipulation at the short peripheral catheter hub).1,2 (V)

    Consider that the potential for contamination exists with all add-on devices. Limit the use of add-on devices whenever possible to decrease the number of manipulation episodes, acciden- tal disconnections or misconnections, and costs.1-9 (IV)

    Ensure that all add-on devices are compatible with the administration system to prevent the risk of leaks, disconnections, or misconnections.5-6 (V)

    Change the add-on device with new vascular access device (VAD) insertion, with each administration set replacement, or as defined by the organization, and whenever the integrity of the product is compro- mised or suspected of being compromised.1,2 (V)

    Avoid the use of stopcocks due to the increased risk of infection.

    Propofol anesthesia may increase risk for postop- erative infection because of microorganism growth in stopcock dead spaces. Bacterial con- tamination of the patients skin, the providers hands, and the environment contribute to infec- tion risk associated with stopcocks.10,11 (IV)

    Use a stopcock or manifold with an integrated needleless connection rather than a solid cap or replace the stopcock with a needleless connector to reduce stopcock contamination.12,13 (IV)

    REFERENCES

    1. Hadaway L. Infusion therapy equipment. In: Alexander M, Corrigan A, Gorski L, Hankins J, Perucca R. eds. Infusion Nursing: An Evidence-Based Approach. 3rd ed. St Louis, MO: Saunders/Elsevier; 2010:391-436.

    2. Alexander M, Gorski L, Corrigan A, Bullock M, Dickenson A, Earhart A. Technical and clinical application. In: Alexander M, Corrigan A, Gorski L, Phillips L, eds. Core Curriculum for Infusion Nursing. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer/ Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014:1-85.

    3. Gonzalez Lopez J, Arriba Vilela A, Fernandez del Palacio E, Olivares Corral J, Benedicto Marti C, Herrera Portal P. Indwell times, complications and costs of open vs closed safety peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomized study. J Hosp Infect. 2014;86(2):117-126.

    4. Tamura N, Abe S, Hagimoto K, et al. Unfavorable peripheral intravenous catheter replacements can be reduced using an integrated closed intravenous catheter system. J Vasc Access. 2014;15(4):257-263.

    5. US Food and Drug Administration. Preventing tubing and luer misconnections. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ AlertsandNotices/TubingandLuerMisconnections/default.htm.

    6. US Food and Drug Administration. Safety considerations to mitigate the risks of misconnections with small-bore connectors intended for enteral applications. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/ MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/Guidance Documents/UCM313385.pdf. Published February 11, 2015.

    7. Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP). Stay connected program. http://ismp.org/tools/stayconnectedprogram.aspx.

    8. American Nurses Association [position paper]. Safety issues related to tubing and catheter misconnections. http://www.nurs- ingworld.org/position/practice/tube.aspx.

    9. Marschall J, Mermel LA, Fakih M, et al; Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Strategies to prevent central line-asso- ciated bloodstream infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35(7): 753-771.

    10. Cole D, Baslanti T, Gravenstein NL, Gravenstein N. Leaving more than your fingerprint on the intravenous line: a prospective study on propofol anesthesia and implications of stopcock contamination. Anesth Analg. 2015;120(4):816-867.

    11. Loftus R, Brown J, Koff M, et al. Multiple reservoirs contribute to intraoperative bacterial transmission. Anesth Analg. 2012;114(6):1236-1248.

    12. Mermel L. Intraoperative stopcock and manifold colonization of newly inserted peripheral intravenous catheters. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35(9):1187-1189.

    13. Sandora TJ, Graham DA, Conway M, Dodson B, Potter-Bynoe G, Margossian SP. Impact of needleless connector change frequency on central line-associated bloodstream infection rate. Am J Infect Control. 2014;42(5):485-489.

    I also checked the CDC Guidelines (2011) and there is only 1 reference to burettes in the guideline and its from 1987.
    Replacement of Administration Sets

    In patients not receiving blood, blood products or fat emulsions, replace administration sets that are continuously used, including secondary sets and add-on devices, no more frequently than at 96-hour intervals, [177] but at least every 7 days [178181]. Category IA

    No recommendation can be made regarding the frequency for replacing intermittently used administration sets. Unresolved issue

    No recommendation can be made regarding the frequency for replacing needles to access implantable ports. Unresolved issue

    Replace tubing used to administer blood, blood products, or fat emulsions (those combined with amino acids and glucose in a 3-in-1 admixture or infused separately) within 24 hours of initiating the infusion [182185]. Category IB

    Replace tubing used to administer propofol infusions every 6 or 12 hours, when the vial is changed, per the manufacturers recommendation (FDA website Medwatch) *186+. Category IA

    No recommendation can be made regarding the length of time a needle used to access implanted ports can remain in place. Unresolved issue

    REFERENCE (the only one cited!)

    179.Snydman DR, Donnelly-Reidy M, Perry LK, Martin WJ. Intravenous tubing containing burettes can be safely changed at 72 hour intervals. Infect Control 1987; 8:1136.

    Also, I did a quick literature search for any newer articles that included burette(s);

    Intravascular device administration sets: replacement after standard versus prolonged use in hospitalised patients – a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (The RSVP Trial)
    Rickard, CM ; Marsh, Nm ; Webster, J ; Gavin, NC ; Mcgrail, Mr ; Larsen, E ; Corley, A ; Long, D ; Gowardman, Jr ; Murgo, M ; Fraser, Jf ; Chan, Rj ; Wallis, MC ; Young, J ; Mcmillan, D ; Zhang, L ; Abu Choudhury, M ; Graves, N ; Playford, Eg
    Bmj Open, 2015, Vol.5(2)

    Should we use closed or open infusion containers for prevention of bloodstream infections?
    Rangel-Frausto, Manuel S ; Higuera-Ramirez, Francisco ; Martinez-Soto, Jose ; Rosenthal, Victor D
    Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2010, Vol.9, pp.6

    Bacterial colonization and endotoxin contamination of intravenous infusion fluids
    Trautmann, M ; Zauser, B ; Wiedeck, H ; Buttenschn, K ; Marre, R
    The Journal of hospital infection, November 1997, Vol.37(3), pp.225-36

    Variance study of burette aliquot volumes
    Schwartz, Lowell M.
    The Analyst, 1990, Vol.115(12), pp.1581-1587

    Intravenous Tubing Containing Burettes Can Be Safely Changed at 72 Hour Intervals
    Gilmore E.
    Nutrition in Clinical Practice, February 1988, Vol.3(1), p.33

    Changing intravenous tubing containing burettes
    Josephson, A
    JAMA, 4 January 1985, Vol.253(1), pp.42

    Intravenous tubing with burettes can be safely changed at 48 hour intervals
    Gorbea, H.F. ; Snydman, D.R. ; Delaney, A. ; Stockman, J. ; Martin, W.J.
    Journal of the American Medical Association, 1984, Vol.251(16), pp.2112-2115

    Any publications further back are way too old (1946).
    I hope this provides some help for you.

    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert, VA-BC.
    Vascular Access Consultant
    E: tim.spencer68@icloud.com
    M: +1 (623) 326 8889 (USA)
    M: +61 (0)409 463 428 (AU)

    > On Aug 3, 2016, at 5:25 PM, Aileen Moerig (Hawkesbury) wrote:
    >
    > Hi Cath, I too am interested in removing the burettes and using the closed system for IV administration. Would you be kind enough to post the literature that you have reviewed many thanks Aileen
    >
    >
    > Aileen Moerig | #Infection Control Coordinator
    > Hawkesbury District Health Service
    > T: (02) 4560 5487 | M: | F: (02) 4560 5662 | E: Aileen.Moerig@sjog.org.au
    > 2 Day Street, Windsor NSW 2756 | Locked Bag 10, Windsor NSW 2756
    > http://sjog.org.au/hawkesbury | http://twitter.com/sjog_healthcare | LinkedIn | http://facebook.com/sjoghealthcare
    >
    >
    >
    > We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of Country throughout Australia and recognise their continuing connection to land, waters and community.
    > We pay our respect to them and their cultures and to Elders past and present.
    >
    >
    > From: ACIPC Infexion Connexion [mailto:AICALIST@AICALIST.ORG.AU] On Behalf Of Catherine Wade
    > Sent: Thursday, 4 August 2016 9:27 AM
    > To: AICALIST@AICALIST.ORG.AU
    > Subject: IV fluid & drug administratioj sets – Burettes or Mini Bags. Open vs Closed Systems
    >
    > Hi All,
    > We are currently reviewing all of our IV administration lines on contract.
    > According to the IV Fluid Company Rep Burettes are not used in the UK or USA
    > Burettes are still widely used by staff however the evidence based practice literature I have been able to find recommends using closed systems (mini bags) to reduce risk of bacteraemia.
    > I would greatly appreciate any feedback from facilities that currently use closed systems, especially any facilities that may have converted over to closed systems in the last 1 to 2 years.
    > I also would greatly appreciate any feedback about how you implemented this change, the challenges associated with this change (if any) and if you noticed any reduction of infection rates.
    > Many Thanks
    >
    > Cath Wade
    >
    > Clinical Nurse Consultant | Infection Prevention and Control
    > Level 1, 67 Holden Street Gosford Hospital
    > Tel: (02) 4320 2664 | Internal Ext: 92664| Fax: (02) 4320 2874 | Internal Fax: 92874| Page: 18885
    > Catherine.Wade@health.nsw.gov.au or CCLHD-IPAC@health.nsw.gov.au
    >
    >
    >
    > This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify the sender.
    >
    > Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of NSW Health or any of its entities.
    > MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.
    > The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.
    >
    > Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.
    >
    > Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au
    > To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au .
    >
    > You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) tolistserv@aicalist.org.au
    >
    > IMPORTANT: This email and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient. They may contain confidential or privileged information. This information may not necessarily be the view of St John of God Health Care Inc (SJGHC). SJGHC does not warrant, represent or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information. SJGHC does not accept liability for any loss or damage in connection with the information. If you are not the intended recipient then any use, reliance, interference with, disclosure, distribution or copying of this information by you is unauthorised and prohibited. If you have received this email in error then please notify the sender by return email and delete all copies. SJGHC does not waive any privilege.
    > MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.
    > The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.
    >
    > Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.
    >
    > Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au
    > To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au .
    >
    > You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    in reply to: Management of blocked PICCs #73170
    Tim Spencer
    Participant

    Author:
    Tim Spencer

    Position:

    Organisation:

    State:

    Hi Daniela,I have several protocols and guidelines for declotting CVADs.Please feel free to email me offline.
    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert, VA-BC.Vascular Access ConsultantPresidential Advisor – Australian Vascular Access SocietyConjoint Lecturer – South West Sydney Clinical School | Faculty of Medicine | University of NSWDirector-at-Large – Vascular Access Certification Corporation (VACC)Chairperson – AVA GlobalStrategy CommitteeRepresentative – WoCoVA Global Strategic CommitteeM: +1 (623) 326 8889 (USA)M: +61 (0)409 463 428 (AU)E:tim.spencer68@icloud.comABN: 51 606 547 370
    Sent from Outlook for iPhone

    _____________________________

    Dear colleagues,Does anyone have a guideline or advicethey would be happy to share regarding the structured management ofPICCs with one or both lumens blocked- including nursing, medical and/or radiology responsibilities?Many thanks in advance,DanielaDaniela Karanfilovska
    Clinical Nurse Consultant
    Infection Prevention & Healthcare Epidemiology
    t 03 90762819 m0427 703769e D.Karanfilovska@alfred.org.au

    Alfred Health
    55 Commercial Road
    Melbourne VIC 3004
    PO Box 315 Prahran
    VIC 3181 Australia
    Alfred Health incorporates The Alfred, Caulfield Hospital and Sandringham Hospital
    http://www.alfredhealth.org.au

    CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify us by return email and delete all copies in your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Alfred Health is not liable for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this communication or for any delay in its receipt.

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    in reply to: Cleaning acoustic wall panelling #72514
    Tim Spencer
    Participant

    Author:
    Tim Spencer

    Position:

    Organisation:

    State:

    Hi Michelle,

    Here is the link to the cleaning instructions that are available on the
    website –

    http://www.autexacoustics.com/assets/Uploads/documents/IA-NA-IN-Wallcovering
    s-Cleaning-Guide-JUL14-JR.pdf

    And here is the link to the composition datasheet –

    http://www.autexacoustics.com/assets/Uploads/documents/IA-US-DS-Composition-
    Datasheet-Mar15-CP-web.pdf

    I have also attached the cleaning PDF for your convenience.

    Many professional recording studios use similar acoustic treatments and I
    would expect that these tiles/panels would be required to be cleaned often.

    They are often secured to surfaces using Velcro tabs.

    It should be fairly easy to remove these from the walls of your MRI room and
    have them cleaned outside of the room if needed.

    I would check the backing of the panels/tiles and see if they can be removed
    – you should see a number of adhesive tabs on the walls behind the tiles.

    Regards,

    Tim..

    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert, VA-BC.

    Independent Vascular Access Consultant
    Conjoint Lecturer, South West Sydney Clinical School | Faculty of Medicine |
    University of NSW

    Director-at-Large, Vascular Access Certification Corporation (VACC)

    M: +1 (623) 326 8889 (USA)

    M: +61 (0)409 463 428 (AU)
    E: tim.spencer68@icloud.com

    “Be a yardstick of quality. Some people aren’t used to an environment where
    excellence is expected.” – Steve Jobs

    Of Michelle E. Kennedy

    Hi All, it has come to our attention we are using a product called
    “Quietspace- Autex” in our MRI rooms. The purpose of the product is to
    minimise extreme noise levels in these areas. The fabric is polyester and
    recommended cleaning is using professional cleaners such as ChemDry. On
    questioning our technicians, no metal devices can be used in these rooms.
    Could you please advise me if this product is used in your MRI rooms, and
    method of cleaning used?

    Thank you

    Michelle Kennedy

    CNC | Infection Prevention Service

    John Hunter Hospital Campus
    Lookout rd, New Lambton
    Tel 02 4921 3129 | michelle.kennedy@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au

    http://www.health.nsw.gov.au

    P Please consider the environment before printing this email

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO
    NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is
    discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products
    or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au .

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Tim Spencer
    Participant

    Author:
    Tim Spencer

    Position:

    Organisation:

    State:

    Hi Joe-Anne,

    You can find the VIP score here..

    http://www.vipscore.net/

    I dont have any forms for shift checks, here but there were some printed forms at my old office @ Liverpool that we did at an old Smith+Nephew IV forum quite a few years ago..

    Im sure there is someone out there who may have something.

    If not, do a search for the PIV guidelines for NSW Health (and QLD) you should find something with them..

    Regards,

    Tim..

    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert, VA-BC.

    Independent Vascular Access Consultant
    Conjoint Lecturer, South West Sydney Clinical School | Faculty of Medicine | University of NSW

    Director-at-Large, Vascular Access Certification Corporation (VACC)

    M: +1 (623) 326 8889 (USA)

    M: +61 (0)409 463 428 (AU)
    E: tim.spencer68@icloud.com

    Be a yardstick of quality. Some people aren’t used to an environment where excellence is expected. Steve Jobs

    Good morning everyone

    Does anyone have a form they use for insertion of IV cannula(s), shift checking sign off, recording of VIP score and removal dates? Are you will to share the form?

    Thanks

    Joe-Anne Bendall

    Joe-Anne Bendall

    Clinical Nurse Consultant Infection Prevention and Control

    Monday Friday 0730 – 1600
    Sydney Hospital and Sydney Eye Hospital

    8 Macquarie St

    SYDNEY NSW 2000

    |* ph +61 2 9382 7199 |*page 22070 via switch 9382 7111| 7 Fax 93827510 |

    *Mobile 0418984255 | * Joe-anne.Bendall@SESIAHS.HEALTH.NSW.GOV.AU

    ———————————————————————————————
    Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, South East Sydney Local Health District and Sydney Children’s Hospital Network (Randwick Campus) Confidentiality Notice
    This email, and the files transmitted with it, are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not permitted to distribute or use this email or any of its attachments in any way. We also request that you advise the sender of the incorrect addressing.
    This email message has been virus-scanned. Although no computer viruses were detected, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, South East Sydney Local Health District and Sydney Children’s Hospital Network (Randwick Campus) accept no liability for any consequential damage resulting from email containing any computer viruses.
    We care for our environment. Please only print this e-mail if necessary.

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au .

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    in reply to: Antiseptic Hand Wash #72398
    Tim Spencer
    Participant

    Author:
    Tim Spencer

    Position:

    Organisation:

    State:

    Hi Michelle,

    Have you asked them for what reasons they have changed their current
    practice?

    Maybe they can supply you with the evidence they used to stop using
    antiseptic hand wash.

    This is currently NOT the recommendations of both a number of Australian and
    international guidelines and recommendations.

    Currently CDC, SHEA, APIC, EPIC, ACI, INS , CNSA and NSW MoH CVAD guidelines
    support the use of antiseptic handwashing in all aspects of vascular access.

    Tim..

    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert, VA-BC.

    Independent Vascular Access Consultant
    Conjoint Lecturer, South West Sydney Clinical School | Faculty of Medicine |
    University of NSW

    Director-at-Large, Vascular Access Certification Corporation (VACC)

    M: +1 (623) 326 8889 (USA)

    M: +61 (0)409 463 428 (AU)
    E: tim.spencer68@icloud.com

    “Be a yardstick of quality. Some people aren’t used to an environment where
    excellence is expected.” – Steve Jobs

    Of Michelle E. Kennedy

    Morning All, I recently found our PICC team no longer use antiseptic hand
    wash pre PICC insertion and use neutral soap. Can anyone tell me where to
    find evidence of using antiseptic hand wash prior to invasive procedures?

    Thank you

    Michelle Kennedy

    CNC | Infection Prevention Service

    John Hunter Hospital Campus
    Lookout rd, New Lambton
    Tel 02 4921 3129 | michelle.kennedy@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au

    http://www.health.nsw.gov.au

    P Please consider the environment before printing this email

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO
    NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is
    discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products
    or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au .

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    in reply to: question around IV fluids – seeking advice #72163
    Tim Spencer
    Participant

    Author:
    Tim Spencer

    Position:

    Organisation:

    State:

    Hi Lindy,

    From a quick review of the INS guidelines, I think if the bag has been
    spiked, it must be used within 24hrs (also in line with the current RCN
    standards of practice). Page S55 addresses the Primary Intermittent
    Infusions, Practice Criteria A & B.

    In regards to the ACSQHC guidelines, I believe you are correct in its
    reference to being attached to a patient – 96hr maximum dwell time.

    IVNNZ Provisional Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice March 2012
    guidelines (pp43-44) also make the same recommendations as INS – 25hrs max.

    As long as there is a new, sterile cover over the luer connection after the
    administration set has been opened to protect the connection, these
    pre-prepared administration sets should be ok to be used based around
    current reviews.

    I agree with you that there is not enough supportive evidence in this
    practice and needs further investigation.

    Tim..

    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert, VA-BC.

    Vascular Access Consultant
    Founding President, Australian Vascular Access Society
    Conjoint Lecturer, South West Sydney Clinical School | Faculty of Medicine |
    University of NSW

    Director-at-Large, Vascular Access Certification Corporation (VACC)

    Representative – WoCoVA Global Strategic Committee
    M: +1 (623) 326 8889 (USA)

    M: +61 (0)409 463 428 (AU)
    E: tim.spencer68@icloud.com

    “Be a yardstick of quality. Some people aren’t used to an environment where
    excellence is expected.” – Steve Jobs

    Of Ryan, Lindy

    Hello

    I have been asked the following question from an operating theatre NUM

    ‘How long do you recommend IV fluids be kept once they have been attached to
    a giving set and the line primed. Both for IVs and arterial lines?”

    They are telling me the lines are being set up for use but not connected
    to any pt & just being set up as part of resuscitation / or urgent need &
    then left untouched in case of another emergency to prevent wastage &
    time in reality .some staff discard straight away and others think they can
    be kept for a few hours .so they just want to establish a time frame
    potentially around infection risk if not used how long they can keep them
    for???.does anyone have any evidence based information I could guide them
    with .I could say if not used straight away discard (common-sense)..but
    wondered if anyone had anything with more substance given this may not be
    useful feedback for them to just follow if I have no idea and the
    information I have found is a bit unclear ..

    I checked the following

    1. CDC Guidelines for the prevention of IVCRI’s 2011 but it had no
    recommendations

    2.Our national 2010 NHMRC ACSQHC IC guidelines (pg 144) recommend that they
    may be left for intervals of up to 4 days (if not containing lipids) however
    I am under the impression that this is a line that is currently in use &
    connected to a patient and not waiting to be used???

    3.2010 RCN Infusion standards recommends

    2.6 Expiry dates

    The maximum expiry date for any injection/ infusion prepared in a clinical
    area is 24 hours or less in accordance with the manufacturer’s specification
    of product characteristics (NPSA, 2007b).

    appreciate any other leads or advice to provide staff

    many thanks in advance

    Lindy

    Lindy Ryan

    Infection prevention & Control Clinical Nurse Consultant (CNC) | Coffs
    Harbour Health Campus

    Pacific Hwy Coffs Harbour NSW 2450
    Tel (02) 6656 7770 | lindy.ryan@ncahs.health.nsw.gov.au

    http://www.health.nsw.gov.au

    “Wise and human management of the patient is the best safeguard against
    infection”

    (Florence Nightingale Circa 1860)

    _____

    This message is intended for the addressee(s) named and may contain
    confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
    delete the message and any attachments and notify the sender. Views
    expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not
    necessarily the views of NSW Health or any of its entities.

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO
    NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is
    discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products
    or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au .

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    in reply to: Non physican led line insertion services #72058
    Tim Spencer
    Participant

    Author:
    Tim Spencer

    Position:

    Organisation:

    State:

    Hi Louise,
    I established and ran the nurse-led CVAD insertion service for 21yrs at Liverpool Hospital.
    Please email me off the list if you need.
    Regards,
    Tim..

    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert, VA-BC.
    Independent Vascular Access Consultant
    Presidential Advisor, Australian Vascular Access Society
    Conjoint Lecturer, South West Sydney Clinical School | Faculty of Medicine | University of NSW
    Representative – WoCoVA Global Strategic Committee
    M: +1(623)326.8889 (USA)
    M: +61(0)409463428 (AU)
    E: tim.spencer68@icloud.com

    Sent from my iPhone

    > On Apr 17, 2015, at 5:33 PM, Hobbs, Louise wrote:
    >
    > Dear All
    >
    > Our organisation is working toward expanding our current nurse led central line insertion service.
    >
    > I would be interested to know whether other organisations have adopted this model and what indicators you use to assess the service and report complications and infections.
    >
    > I would also be interested in what role you as IPC professionals have with monitoring, collating and reporting infection/complication data for the service.
    >
    > Look forward to hearing your responses either on or off line.
    >
    > Kind regards
    >
    > Louise Hobbs PhD | Manager Infection Prevention and Surveillance Service
    > Melbourne Health | Royal Melbourne Hospital – City Campus | Level 9 Royal Melbourne Hospital
    > Grattan Street, Parkville Victoria 3052
    > T: + 61 3 9342 8328 | F: + 61 3 9342 7277 | e: louise.hobbs@mh.org.au
    >
    > MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.
    >
    > The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.
    >
    > Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.
    >
    > Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au
    >
    > To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.
    >
    > You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    in reply to: Use of IV Venflon Catheter #71957
    Tim Spencer
    Participant

    Author:
    Tim Spencer

    Position:

    Organisation:

    State:

    That’s a great idea Claire!
    Show them the evidence!!
    Tim..

    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert, VA-BC.
    Independent Vascular Access Consultant
    President, Australian Vascular Access Society
    Conjoint Lecturer, South West Sydney Clinical School | Faculty of Medicine | University of NSW
    Representative – WoCoVA Global Strategic Committee
    M: +1(623)326.8889 (USA)
    M: +61(0)409463428 (AU)
    E: tim.spencer68@icloud.com

    Sent from my iPhone

    > On Mar 18, 2015, at 9:22 PM, Claire Rickard wrote:
    >
    > HI Rosie
    >
    > I would recommend you do a small quality improvement/research study and culture some of the used cannula. It would be great to get the ports cultured (and also check the tip culture (internal and external)). Have a talk to your micro lab senior scientist and ID physician, they might be interested in helping you and collaborating on a study? And I would get the anaesthetists on board with it too, – if they think they are good to use, let us get data and find out!!?? You would also need some control catheters (non-ported) also used in theatre for similar number of hours/accessed. And some no-used controls (from straight out of the packet).
    >
    > Would be exciting and useful research to present at ACIPIC!!
    >
    > PM me if you would like any advice 😀
    >
    >
    > —
    >
    > Dr Claire Rickard, Professor, NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Nursing Interventions in Hospitalised Patients, Menzies Health Institute Queensland
    > Alliance for Vascular Access Teaching and Research (AVATAR)
    > Visiting Scholar at the Princess Alexandra, Prince Charles, and Royal Brisbane & Women’s Hospitals
    > Assistant: Jo.Wright@griffith.edu.au Tel: +61 7 3735 4886
    >
    > MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.
    > The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.
    >
    > Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.
    >
    > Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au
    >
    > To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.
    >
    > You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    in reply to: Re: Use of IV venflon catheter #71946
    Tim Spencer
    Participant

    Author:
    Tim Spencer

    Position:

    Organisation:

    State:

    Thanks for your reply Jenny.

    If anaesthetics are placing a device for the specified case, then it
    shouldn’t be ‘dodgy’ if it’s a new insertion – unless they are using an
    existing cannula, which could be non-functional, contaminated/infected or at
    the very least, past its used-by (dwell) date! Not recommended.

    Ported cannula are very problematic – from infectious and disinfection
    complications as previously noted.

    It’s also the reason why ported cannula are not used at all in the USA and
    are not addressed by the current INS Guidelines.

    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert, VA-BC.

    Independent Vascular Access Consultant
    President, Australian Vascular Access Society
    Conjoint Lecturer, South West Sydney Clinical School | Faculty of Medicine |
    University of NSW

    Director-at-Large, Vascular Access Certification Corporation (VACC)

    Representative – WoCoVA Global Strategic Committee
    M: +1 (623) 326 8889 (USA)

    M: +61 (0)409 463 428 (AU)
    E: tim.spencer68@icloud.com

    “Be a yardstick of quality. Some people aren’t used to an environment where
    excellence is expected.” – Steve Jobs

    Of Jenny McCarthy

    Hi Tim

    B Braun have a similar product which is used in our Operating Room. I have
    been aware of the difficulty in decontaminating the hub – the anaesthetists
    say it is better as they know the drug is going straight into the vein – as
    opposed to using the injection port which can be an issue if the IV is a bit
    dodgy! Thanks for your references and suggestions,

    Jenny

    Jenny McCarthy

    OR Manager/Infection Prevention and Control Coordinator

    Maryvale Private Hospital

    _____

    Of Tim Spencer

    Hi Rosie,

    You are correct. The BD Venflon IV cannula has been widely used throughout
    Europe and the UK (well it was when I was there many years ago). Is it the
    Pro Safety or the standard ported cannula?

    This style of ported cannula has been around since the early 1980’s, so
    despite the recent addition of a safety aspect, it is still old technology
    (in regards to the port aspect).

    A ported cannula has significantly increased infection rates due to the
    inability to correctly scrub the hub or decontaminate the injection port, as
    well as port cap failure.

    Here is an Australian publication from NT in 2013 that may help in product
    purchase changes – Tay, S et al. Functional evaluation and practice survey
    to guide purchasing of intravenous cannulae, BMC Anesthesiology 2013, 13:49
    http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/13/49

    There has also been reports from the UK of the ports failing – H. Adler, R.
    Cunningham, R. Parimkayala Valve failure in an injection port, Irish Journal
    of Medical Science June 2011, Volume 180, Issue 2, p 615

    http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11845-010-0622-z

    These ported styles of cannula were likely introduced due to the higher
    number of UK physicians coming to work in WA (possibly due to clinician
    preference only) and have high infection and poor compliance rates, due to
    the difficult nature of port location. These are primarily placed in OT only
    (as you describe) and are not used in the general wards areas as far as I am
    aware.

    Although this may be a ‘convenient option’ for clinicians, it is not in the
    best interest of the patient, due to the higher risks associated with these
    types of cannulae.

    From the BD Europe website;
    http://www.bd.com/europe/safety/en/products/infusion/bdv_prosafety.asp

    * BD VialonT – Proven easy insertion and longer in dwell times1-4

    1) Maki D, Ringer M. Risk Factors for Infusion-related Phlebitis with
    Small Peripheral Venous Catheters. Annals of Internal Medicine. (1991); 114:
    845-854.

    2) Gaukroger PB, Roberts JG, Manners TA. Infusion Thrombophlebitis: A
    Prospective Comparison of 645 VialonR and TeflonR Canulae in Anesthetic and
    Postoperative Use. Anesthesia and Intensive Care.August (1988); 16(3).

    3) Stanley M, Meister E, Fuschuber K. Infiltration During Intravenous
    Therapy in Neonates: Comparison of TeflonR and VialonR Catheters. Southern
    Medical Journal.September (1992); 85(9); 883-886.

    4) McKee JM, Shell JA, Warren TA, Campbell VP. Complications of
    Intravenous Therapy: A Randomized Prospective Study–Vialon vs. Teflon.
    Journal of Infusion Nursing. September (1989); 12: 288-2.

    Considering the ongoing changes in technology and increased focus on device
    and patient outcomes, these references are very old and dated. I agree with
    you that this as a huge risk for contamination and a breach of AT
    principles.

    The BD Nexiva cannula would seem to be a far better alternative (for patient
    and clinician), and still offering a safety option, various access points
    and improved securement.

    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert, VA-BC.

    Independent Vascular Access Consultant
    President, Australian Vascular Access Society
    Conjoint Lecturer, South West Sydney Clinical School | Faculty of Medicine |
    University of NSW

    Director-at-Large, Vascular Access Certification Corporation (VACC)

    Representative – WoCoVA Global Strategic Committee
    M: +1 (623) 326 8889 (USA)

    M: +61 (0)409 463 428 (AU)
    E: tim.spencer68@icloud.com

    “Be a yardstick of quality. Some people aren’t used to an environment where
    excellence is expected.” – Steve Jobs

    Of Lee, Rosie

    Hello

    Recently I have been made aware of this practice following implementation of
    Aseptic Technique Policy. It appears in our theatres the Anaesthetists use
    the BD VenflonT intravenous catheter with integrated injection port and
    valve for medication and this stays in the patient. I am told the caps are
    either being left open in Theatres for quick access by Anaesthetists or they
    popp off very frequently. In recovery nurses are observed continuing to use
    this to administer medication. I see this as a huge risk for contamination
    and a breach of AT principles.

    The BD representative states that this type of catheter is not used in other
    states of Australia but is common in UK and Europe. Is this correct?

    Have you come across this in your hospitals? If so have you ceased the use
    or do you advocate using the side extension tubing which has a hub that can
    be scrubbed?

    Regards

    Rosie Lee | Coordinator | Infection Prevention & Management
    Royal Perth Hospital

    Level 6, South Block, Wellington Street PERTH WA 6000
    T: (08) 9224 2805 | F: (08) 9224 1989
    E: rosie.lee@health.wa.gov.au
    http://www.rph.health.wa.gov.au |
    http://www.healthywa.wa.gov.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO
    NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is
    discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products
    or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au .

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO
    NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is
    discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products
    or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au .

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Maryvale Private Hospital Confidentiality and Privacy Notice

    NOTICE – This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It
    may contain information which is confidential or proprietary. If you are not
    the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this
    e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient you should not copy this
    e-mail or use the information contained in it for any purpose nor disclose
    its contents to any other person. Maryvale Private Hospital Pty Ltd accepts
    no responsibility for electronic viruses or damage caused as a result of
    this email or for changes made to this email or to any attachments after
    transmission from Maryvale Private Hospital. You should not distribute or
    publish the contents of this email or any attachment without the prior
    consent of Maryvale Private Hospital.
    * Please consider the environment before printing this email

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO
    NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is
    discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products
    or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au .

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    in reply to: Re: Use of IV venflon catheter #71940
    Tim Spencer
    Participant

    Author:
    Tim Spencer

    Position:

    Organisation:

    State:

    Hi Rosie,

    You are correct. The BD Venflon IV cannula has been widely used throughout
    Europe and the UK (well it was when I was there many years ago). Is it the
    Pro Safety or the standard ported cannula?

    This style of ported cannula has been around since the early 1980’s, so
    despite the recent addition of a safety aspect, it is still old technology
    (in regards to the port aspect).

    A ported cannula has significantly increased infection rates due to the
    inability to correctly scrub the hub or decontaminate the injection port, as
    well as port cap failure.

    Here is an Australian publication from NT in 2013 that may help in product
    purchase changes – Tay, S et al. Functional evaluation and practice survey
    to guide purchasing of intravenous cannulae, BMC Anesthesiology 2013, 13:49
    http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/13/49

    There has also been reports from the UK of the ports failing – H. Adler, R.
    Cunningham, R. Parimkayala Valve failure in an injection port, Irish Journal
    of Medical Science June 2011, Volume 180, Issue 2, p 615

    http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11845-010-0622-z

    These ported styles of cannula were likely introduced due to the higher
    number of UK physicians coming to work in WA (possibly due to clinician
    preference only) and have high infection and poor compliance rates, due to
    the difficult nature of port location. These are primarily placed in OT only
    (as you describe) and are not used in the general wards areas as far as I am
    aware.

    Although this may be a ‘convenient option’ for clinicians, it is not in the
    best interest of the patient, due to the higher risks associated with these
    types of cannulae.

    From the BD Europe website;
    http://www.bd.com/europe/safety/en/products/infusion/bdv_prosafety.asp

    * BD VialonT – Proven easy insertion and longer in dwell times1-4

    1) Maki D, Ringer M. Risk Factors for Infusion-related Phlebitis with
    Small Peripheral Venous Catheters. Annals of Internal Medicine. (1991); 114:
    845-854.

    2) Gaukroger PB, Roberts JG, Manners TA. Infusion Thrombophlebitis: A
    Prospective Comparison of 645 VialonR and TeflonR Canulae in Anesthetic and
    Postoperative Use. Anesthesia and Intensive Care.August (1988); 16(3).

    3) Stanley M, Meister E, Fuschuber K. Infiltration During Intravenous
    Therapy in Neonates: Comparison of TeflonR and VialonR Catheters. Southern
    Medical Journal.September (1992); 85(9); 883-886.

    4) McKee JM, Shell JA, Warren TA, Campbell VP. Complications of
    Intravenous Therapy: A Randomized Prospective Study–Vialon vs. Teflon.
    Journal of Infusion Nursing. September (1989); 12: 288-2.

    Considering the ongoing changes in technology and increased focus on device
    and patient outcomes, these references are very old and dated. I agree with
    you that this as a huge risk for contamination and a breach of AT
    principles.

    The BD Nexiva cannula would seem to be a far better alternative (for patient
    and clinician), and still offering a safety option, various access points
    and improved securement.

    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert, VA-BC.

    Independent Vascular Access Consultant
    President, Australian Vascular Access Society
    Conjoint Lecturer, South West Sydney Clinical School | Faculty of Medicine |
    University of NSW

    Director-at-Large, Vascular Access Certification Corporation (VACC)

    Representative – WoCoVA Global Strategic Committee
    M: +1 (623) 326 8889 (USA)

    M: +61 (0)409 463 428 (AU)
    E: tim.spencer68@icloud.com

    “Be a yardstick of quality. Some people aren’t used to an environment where
    excellence is expected.” – Steve Jobs

    Of Lee, Rosie

    Hello

    Recently I have been made aware of this practice following implementation of
    Aseptic Technique Policy. It appears in our theatres the Anaesthetists use
    the BD VenflonT intravenous catheter with integrated injection port and
    valve for medication and this stays in the patient. I am told the caps are
    either being left open in Theatres for quick access by Anaesthetists or they
    popp off very frequently. In recovery nurses are observed continuing to use
    this to administer medication. I see this as a huge risk for contamination
    and a breach of AT principles.

    The BD representative states that this type of catheter is not used in other
    states of Australia but is common in UK and Europe. Is this correct?

    Have you come across this in your hospitals? If so have you ceased the use
    or do you advocate using the side extension tubing which has a hub that can
    be scrubbed?

    Regards

    Rosie Lee | Coordinator | Infection Prevention & Management
    Royal Perth Hospital

    Level 6, South Block, Wellington Street PERTH WA 6000
    T: (08) 9224 2805 | F: (08) 9224 1989
    E: rosie.lee@health.wa.gov.au
    http://www.rph.health.wa.gov.au |
    http://www.healthywa.wa.gov.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO
    NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is
    discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products
    or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au .

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Tim Spencer
    Participant

    Author:
    Tim Spencer

    Position:

    Organisation:

    State:

    Seems like all Australian states have a regulation in regards to Healthcare
    Practitioner legislation..

    Interesting..

    Thanks for highlighting Jo..

    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert, VA-BC.

    Independent Vascular Access Consultant
    President, Australian Vascular Access Society
    Conjoint Lecturer, South West Sydney Clinical School | Faculty of Medicine |
    University of NSW

    Director-at-Large, Vascular Access Certification Corporation (VACC)

    Representative – WoCoVA Global Strategic Committee
    M: +1 (623) 326 8889 (USA)

    M: +61 (0)409 463 428 (AU)
    E: tim.spencer68@icloud.com

    “Be a yardstick of quality. Some people aren’t used to an environment where
    excellence is expected.” – Steve Jobs

    Of Joe-Anne Bendall
    PRACTITIONER REGULATION (NEW SOUTH WALES) REGULATION 2010 – SCHEDULE 1 ??

    Hi

    I did find it in the old NSW Regulations

    http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/num_reg/na1991rrtics1995221601.pdf

    I did not remember it being in the NSW legislation from the 90s!

    Thanks

    Joe-Anne Bendall

    Joe-anne Bendall

    Clinical Nurse Consultant Infection Prevention and Control
    Sydney Hospital and Sydney Eye Hospital

    8 Macquarie St

    SYDNEY NSW 2000

    |* ph +61 2 9382 7199 |*page 22070 via switch 9382 7111| 7 Fax 93827510 |

    *Mobile 0418984255 | *
    Joe-anne.Bendall@SESIAHS.HEALTH.NSW.GOV.AU

    Of Montague, Cathi (Health)
    PRACTITIONER REGULATION (NEW SOUTH WALES) REGULATION 2010 – SCHEDULE 1 ??

    Not in SA regulations current version on
    http://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/LZ/C/A/Health%20Practitioner%20Regulation%2
    0National%20Law%20(South%20Australia)%20Act%202010.aspx unless buried in
    subsequent gazette.

    I thought the intent of these legislations was that they would all be the
    same across Australia??

    Great amendment tho.

    Would be even stronger if point one went both ways (staff to patient and
    vice-versa transmission)

    Will be interested to see others point of view / other states responses.

    Best regards,

    Cathi

    Cathi Montague, RN,(Midwife), ENB998, MClinNsg, FCENA

    High quality, compassionate healthcare | Infection Prevention and Control is
    everyones’ business

    Nurse Management Facilitator | Clinical Care Systems Co-ordination
    SA Prison Health Service – Corporate Office
    Central Adelaide Local Health Network
    5 Darley Road (first floor), Paradise SA 5075
    Postal address: PO Box 101, 620 Lower North East Road, Campbelltown SA 5074
    70023199 | DX 191

    We would like to acknowledge this land that we meet on today is the
    traditional lands for Kaurna people and that we respect their spiritual
    relationship with their country. We also acknowledge the Kaurna people as
    the custodians of the Adelaide region and that their cultural and heritage
    beliefs are still as important to the living Kaurna people today.

    This email may contain confidential information, which also may be legally
    privileged. Only the intended recipient(s) may access or use this email.
    Distribution or Copying must only be with the express consent of the sender.
    If this email is received in error, please inform the sender by return email
    and delete the original. If there are doubts about the validity of this
    message, please contact the sender by telephone. It is the recipient’s
    responsibility to check the email and any attached files for viruses.

    Of Joe-Anne Bendall
    REGULATION (NEW SOUTH WALES) REGULATION 2010 – SCHEDULE 1 ??

    Does anyone know when this went into the legislation?

    Is it in other states and territories legislation?

    Part 2 – General standards applying to relevant health practitioners

    2 General precautions and aseptic techniques

    (1) Precautions must be taken to avoid direct exposure to a patient’s blood
    or body substance.

    (2) The requirement in subclause (1) applies regardless of whether there is
    any perceived risk of infection.

    (3) Aseptic techniques must be used in the course of complying with the
    requirements of this Schedule.

    http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_reg/hprswr2010580/sch1.html

    Thanks

    Joe-Anne Bendall

    Joe-anne Bendall

    Clinical Nurse Consultant Infection Prevention and Control
    Sydney Hospital and Sydney Eye Hospital

    8 Macquarie St

    SYDNEY NSW 2000

    |* ph +61 2 9382 7199 |*page 22070 via switch 9382 7111| 7 Fax 93827510 |

    *Mobile 0418984255 | *
    Joe-anne.Bendall@SESIAHS.HEALTH.NSW.GOV.AU

    —————————————————————————-
    —————–

    Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, South East Sydney Local Health
    District and Sydney Children’s Hospital Network (Randwick Campus)
    Confidentiality Notice

    This email, and the files transmitted with it, are confidential and intended
    solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
    If you are not the intended recipient, you are not permitted to distribute
    or use this email or any of its attachments in any way. We also request that
    you advise the sender of the incorrect addressing.

    This email message has been virus-scanned. Although no computer viruses were
    detected, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, South East Sydney
    Local Health District and Sydney Children’s Hospital Network (Randwick
    Campus) accept no liability for any consequential damage resulting from
    email containing any computer viruses.

    We care for our environment. Please only print this e-mail if necessary.

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO
    NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is
    discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products
    or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au .

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO
    NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is
    discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products
    or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au .

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    —————————————————————————-
    —————–

    Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, South East Sydney Local Health
    District and Sydney Children’s Hospital Network (Randwick Campus)
    Confidentiality Notice

    This email, and the files transmitted with it, are confidential and intended
    solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
    If you are not the intended recipient, you are not permitted to distribute
    or use this email or any of its attachments in any way. We also request that
    you advise the sender of the incorrect addressing.

    This email message has been virus-scanned. Although no computer viruses were
    detected, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, South East Sydney
    Local Health District and Sydney Children’s Hospital Network (Randwick
    Campus) accept no liability for any consequential damage resulting from
    email containing any computer viruses.

    We care for our environment. Please only print this e-mail if necessary.

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO
    NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is
    discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products
    or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au .

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    in reply to: disconnection of IV lines in Medical Imaging #71901
    Tim Spencer
    Participant

    Author:
    Tim Spencer

    Position:

    Organisation:

    State:

    Hi Lindy and Lincoln,

    It is interesting to ask what and who determines what a ‘transient
    controlled disconnection’ is? The problem is that these disconnections are
    performed by a large variety of clinicians (non-nursing colleagues also) who
    do not always know or understand IV best practices.

    I would definitely NOT recommend a disconnection just for removing a sleeve
    or a sling at all – this is a high risk opportunity for contamination and is
    an unnecessary disconnection. It takes the same time to feed the IV
    administration set through the patients sleeve as it does to disconnect and
    re-connect, less the infection/contamination risk.

    The key point I would consider here is that if an IV administration set
    disconnection is required (for whatever procedure), the hubs must be
    correctly disinfected after the disconnection and before re-connection of
    the original administration set.

    The administration set luer connector also must be covered with a sterile
    device (blunt cannula and cover) during the investigative procedure.

    When reconnection occurs, then the needle free device should be
    decontaminated with 70% IPA.

    I have cut and pasted from the current INS Guidelines & CDC (2011) state in
    regards to peripheral IV administration sets and disconnection;

    26. ADD-ON DEVICES

    Standard

    26.1 The use of add-on devices shall be established in organizational
    policies, procedures, and/or practice

    guidelines and according to manufacturers’ directions for use.

    26.2 The nurse shall be competent in the use of the add-on device and shall
    be knowledgeable about the

    risk of misconnection and potential disconnections.

    26.3 All add-on devices shall be of luer-lock design to ensure a secure
    junction.

    Practice Criteria

    A. Add-on devices may include, but are not limited to, stopcocks, single and
    multi lumen extension sets,

    manifold sets, extension loops, solid cannula caps, needleless systems,
    in-line filters, and manual flow control

    devices.1 (V)

    B. All add-on devices should be compatible with the administration system to
    prevent the risk of leaks,

    disconnections, or misconnections.2,3 (V)

    C. The nurse should be aware that the potential for contamination exists
    with all add-on devices. In

    an effort to decrease the risk of contamination, the number of manipulation
    episodes, accidental

    disconnections or misconnections, and costs, there should be limited use of
    these devices.1 (V)

    D. To determine the appropriate placement of the selected add-on device, the
    nurse should trace the

    administration set from the patient to the point of origin before attaching
    the device.2,4,5 (IV)

    E. The nurse should disinfect the ports of the add-on device using friction,
    with an appropriate disinfectant

    such as 70% alcohol before accessing. Specific guidelines directing the
    appropriate technique,

    disinfectant, or amount of time required to- clean devices prior to access
    are unresolved. The

    access port should be accessed only with sterile devices.6,7 (V)

    F. The nurse should change the add-on device with the catheter, with each
    administration set replacement,

    or as defined by the organization, and whenever the integrity of the product
    is compromised

    or suspected of being compromised.1 (V)

    G. The use of stopcocks is not recommended due to the increased risk of
    infection. When a stopcock is

    attached as an add-on device, the nurse should attach sterile caps to the
    ports of the stopcock to

    provide a closed system when not in use and access sites that will allow
    cleaning prior to accessing.1 (V)

    REFERENCES

    1. Hadaway L. Infusion therapy equipment. In: Alexander M, Corrigan A,
    Gorski L, Hankins J, Perucca R. eds. Infusion

    Saunders/Elsevier; 2010:391-436.

    2. The Joint Commission. Tubing misconnections: a persistent and potentially
    deadly occurrence. Joint Commission Sentinel Event

    Alert.
    http://www.jointcommission.org/SentinelEvents/SentinelEventAlert/sea_36.htm.
    Accessed December 5, 2009.

    3. US Food and Drug Administration. 2009 medical device safety calendar on
    luer misconnections. http://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/

    Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm134863.htm. Accessed July 8, 2009.

    4. Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP). Problems persist with
    life-threatening tubing misconnections. Medication Safe

    Alert! June 17, 2004.

    5. American Nurses Association [position paper]. Safety Issues Related to
    Tubing & Catheter Misconnections. http://www.nursingworld.org/

    position/practice/tube.aspx. Accessed February 13, 2010.

    6. Kaler W, Chinn R. Successful disinfection of needleless mechanical valve
    access ports: a matter of time and friction. J Assoc

    Vascular Access. 2007;12(3):140-142.

    7. Marschall J, Mermel L, Classen D, et al. Compendium of strategies to
    prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections in acute care

    hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29(S1):S22-S30.

    43. ADMINISTRATION SET CHANGE

    Standard

    43.1 Administration set changes shall be performed routinely, based on
    factors such as type of solution administered,

    type of the infusion (continuous versus intermittent), immediately upon
    suspected contamination, or when the

    integrity of the product or system has been compromised.

    43.2 The administration set shall be changed whenever the peripheral
    catheter site is rotated or when a new

    central vascular access device is placed.

    43.3 Add-on devices used as part of the administration set, such as single
    and multi lumen extension sets and filters,

    shall be changed at the same time as the administration set.

    43.4 The frequency of performing administration set changes and the system
    used to promote adherence to

    administration set change (eg, labeling/electronic) shall be established in
    organizational policies, procedures,

    and/or practice guidelines.

    43.5 A vented administration set shall be used for solutions supplied in
    glass or semi-rigid containers, and a nonvented

    administration set shall be used for plastic fluid containers.

    43.6 All administration sets shall be of luer-lock design to ensure a secure
    junction.

    Practice Criteria

    I. General

    A. The use of add-on devices for administration sets should be minimized as
    each device is a potential

    source of contamination, misuse, and disconnection; it is preferable to use
    an administration set with

    devices as an integral part of the set (see Standard 26, Add-on Devices).1
    (V)

    Practice Criteria

    II. Primary and Secondary Continuous Infusions

    A. Primary and secondary continuous administration sets used to administer
    fluids other than lipid, blood,

    or blood products should be changed no more frequently than every 96 hours.
    There is strong evidence

    that changing the administration sets more frequently does not decrease the
    risk of infection.2-3 (I)

    B. Extending the administration set change to every 7 days may be considered
    when an anti-infective

    central vascular access device (CVAD) is being used or if fluids that
    enhance microbial growth

    are not administered through the set.3,4 (II)

    C. If a secondary administration set is detached from the primary
    administration set, the secondary

    administration set is considered a primary intermittent administration set
    and should be changed

    every 24 hours (see Practice Criteria III, Primary Intermittent Infusions).1
    (V)

    D. When compatibility of infusates is verified, use of secondary
    administration sets that use back-priming

    infusion methods are preferred due to reduced need for disconnecting
    secondary intermittent

    administration sets.1 (V)

    Practice Criteria

    III. Primary Intermittent Infusions

    A. Primary intermittent administration sets should be changed every 24
    hours. When an intermittent

    infusion is repeatedly disconnected and reconnected for the infusion, there
    is increased risk of contamination

    at the catheter hub, needleless connector, and the male luer end of the
    administration set, potentially

    increasing risk for catheter-related bloodstream infection. There is an
    absence of studies addressing administration

    set changes for intermittent infusions. In a meta-analysis of 12 randomized,
    controlled trials that supported

    increasing the time interval for administration set changes to 96 hours, at
    least 2 of the studies

    excluded administration sets used for heparin locked catheters and in sets
    disconnected for more

    than 4 hours. In several others, exclusions were not stated.1,5 (V)

    B. A new, sterile, compatible covering device should be aseptically attached
    to the end of the administration

    set after each intermittent use. The practice of attaching the exposed end
    of the administration

    set to a port on the same set (“looping”) should be avoided.1,5 (V)

    The CDC 2011 Guidelines are also unresolved on this point of disconnection,
    but strong on the decontamination process;

    Replacement of Administration Sets

    1. In patients not receiving blood, blood products or fat emulsions, replace
    administration sets that are continuously used, including secondary sets and
    add-on devices, no more frequently than at 96-hour intervals, [177] but at
    least every 7 days [178-181]. Category IA

    2. No recommendation can be made regarding the frequency for replacing
    intermittently used administration sets. Unresolved issue

    Needleless Intravascular Catheter Systems

    1. Change the needleless components at least as frequently as the
    administration set. There is no benefit to changing these more frequently
    than every 72 hours. [39, 187-193]. Category II

    2. Change needleless connectors no more frequently than every 72 hours or
    according to manufacturers’ recommendations for the purpose of reducing
    infection rates *187, 189, 192, 193]. Category II

    3. Ensure that all components of the system are compatible to minimize leaks
    and breaks in the system [194]. Category II

    4. Minimize contamination risk by scrubbing the access port with an
    appropriate antiseptic (chlorhexidine, povidone iodine, an iodophor, or 70%
    alcohol) and accessing the port only with sterile devices [189, 192,
    194-196]. Category IA

    5. Use a needleless system to access IV tubing. Category IC

    The CDC document doesn’t really provide any concrete information on the set
    change issue as it was unresolved (surprisingly), but provides Cat 1A
    support for decontaminating devices.

    If you need a copy, please let me know and I can provide one.

    Regards,

    Tim..

    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert, VA-BC.

    Independent Vascular Access Consultant
    President, Australian Vascular Access Society
    Conjoint Lecturer, South West Sydney Clinical School | Faculty of Medicine |
    University of NSW

    Director-at-Large, Vascular Access Certification Corporation (VACC)

    Representative – WoCoVA Global Strategic Committee
    M: +1 (623) 326 8889 (USA)

    M: +61 (0)409 463 428 (AU)
    E: tim.spencer68@icloud.com

    “Be a yardstick of quality. Some people aren’t used to an environment where
    excellence is expected.” – Steve Jobs

    Of Ryan, Lindy

    Dear Lincoln

    I have attached NSW CEC PIVC guidelines. The development of this document
    was a very hotly debated & commented on (& still is).

    Anyhow our NSW state guidelines recommend as per below

    Guideline for PIVC Insertion and Post Insertion Care in Adult Patients

    GUIDELINE

    GL2013_013 Issue date: December-2013 Page 8 of 16

    9.3.2 IV tubing sets should not be disconnected for routine care, but may be
    disconnected for transient, controlled disconnections such as changing IV
    infusions, removing a sling or sleeve, or access in Operating Theatres,
    Medical Imaging or Radiology Departments.

    9.3.3 Except for transient controlled disconnections as above, if the IV
    giving set is disconnected, replace the entire IV tubing.

    Hope this information useful

    Regards

    Lindy Ryan

    Lindy Ryan

    Infection prevention & Control Clinical Nurse Consultant (CNC) | Coffs
    Harbour Health Campus

    Pacific Hwy Coffs Harbour NSW 2450
    Tel (02) 6656 7770 | lindy.ryan@ncahs.health.nsw.gov.au

    http://www.health.nsw.gov.au

    Of Lincoln Fowler

    Hi all

    In trying to implement a no disconnection policy for our IV lines. I have
    had some opposition from Medical Imaging:

    “IV lines need to be disconnected only for a few reasons. . whilst the
    patient was in the fluoroscopy machine as there is a risk of getting the
    line caught in the equipment. For these types of procedures the table
    rotates vertically and horizontally so that the patient can be standing or
    lying down to assess the upper GI tract. Other occasions where we need to
    disconnect the line is when there is no access for CT IV contrast whilst the
    line is connected.” I believe the last point is that they want to use the in
    use IV cannula so they disconnect it and attach their device.

    I am interested in what guidelines are in place in other organisations to
    assist in situations like these.

    Cheers

    Lincoln Fowler

    Infection Prevention Consultant

    Bairnsdale Regional Health Service

    http://www.brhs.com.au

    Bairnsdale Regional Health Service is located on the traditional land of the
    Gunaikurnai people.

    This communication is intended only to be read or used by the addressee.
    Information contained in this communication may be confidential information.
    If you are not the intended recipient, any use, interference with,
    distribution, disclosure or copying of this material is unauthorised and
    prohibited. The confidentiality attached to this communication is not waived
    or lost by reason of the mistaken delivery to you. If you have received this
    communication in error, please destroy it and send a reply message to the
    author.

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO
    NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is
    discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products
    or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au .

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    _____

    This message is intended for the addressee(s) named and may contain
    confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
    delete the message and any attachments and notify the sender. Views
    expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not
    necessarily the views of NSW Health or any of its entities.

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO
    NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is
    discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products
    or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au .

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    in reply to: Ultrasound probe cleaning #71749
    Tim Spencer
    Participant

    Author:
    Tim Spencer

    Position:

    Organisation:

    State:

    Hi James,

    Current literature I could find

    American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine

    Guidelines for Cleaning and Preparing External- and Internal-Use Ultrasound Probes Between Patients

    Approved 4/2/2014

    http://www.aium.org/officialstatements/57

    Society of Radiographers, UK

    https://www.sor.org/system/files/article/201410/ultrasound_probe_cleaning_decontamination_disinfection_and_sterilisation.pdf

    Friday, October 17, 2014, Issue 12

    CDC Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2008 (old reference but they havent updated the guidelines as far as I can see)

    http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/pdf/guidelines/Disinfection_Nov_2008.pdf

    This seems to all thats currently new.

    Hope this provides some help with your search.

    Regards,

    Tim..

    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert, VA-BC.

    Independent Vascular Access Consultant
    President, Australian Vascular Access Society
    Conjoint Lecturer, South West Sydney Clinical School | Faculty of Medicine | University of NSW

    Director-at-Large, Vascular Access Certification Corporation (VACC)
    M: +1 (623) 326 8889 (USA)

    M: +61 (0)409 463 428 (AU)
    E: tim.spencer68@icloud.com

    Be a yardstick of quality. Some people aren’t used to an environment where excellence is expected. Steve Jobs

    Dear Team,

    I am a member of the Standards of Practice Committee for the Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine.

    There remains a great deal of heterogeneity in recommendations regarding cleaning of ultrasound transducers, and conflicting recommendations by various bodies. We also receive pressure from vendors to support their products, usually backed by a host of complicated and difficult to interpret evidence.

    I wondered whether you had specific up to date evidence based references you would recommend us reviewing regarding:

    1. Regular cleaning of ultrasound transducers used on closed skin.

    2. Cleaning of transducers used for intracavity scanning.

    For those of you wishing to read further:

    Currently most ultrasound users are aware they should perform:

    1. Regular cleaning of ultrasound transducers used on closed skin.

    *Clean as you would your hands – wash with warm mild detergent and running water between each patient.
    *Some would use Chlorhexidine wash or alcohol impregnated wipes – although these are not recommended by manufacturers as they may damage the face of the transducer.
    *Where there is contact with body fluids clean as per intracavity transducer.

    2. Cleaning of intracavity transducers – high level disinfection

    *Wash removing all visible gel / residue – running water, mild detergent, wipe dry.
    *Use one of the approved agents according to manufacturer guidelines
    *Including hydrogen peroxide, glutaraldehyde, ortho-phthalaldehyde (OPA)
    *Opinion on chlorine dioxide delivered via the wipe system, and paracetic acid seems divided.
    *The concern regarding the wipes is based on inter user variability.
    *There has been some literature describing paracetic acid damage to endoscopes.

    Your advice is again much appreciated.

    Just want to ensure we remain up to date.

    Sincerely

    James Rippey

    Associate Professor James Rippey

    Emergency Physician

    University of Western Australia

    Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital

    King Edward Memorial Hospital for Women

    Emergency Medicine Lead for the Kimberley

    Mobile 0400990186

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au .

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 30 total)