Select Page

Tim Spencer

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 11 posts - 31 through 41 (of 41 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: MROs in procedural areas #69297
    Tim Spencer
    Participant

    Author:
    Tim Spencer

    Position:

    Organisation:

    State:

    Hi Michael,
    I find this interesting also.
    I use a procedureal area for CVAD insertion, seeing up to 5-8 patients a day.
    Quite often, these have an MRO (incl VRE) and I often see these patients towards the end of the day after the ‘non-infectious’ patients.
    50% of my patients are immuno-compromised and so I triage my requests lists based around immune and infection status.
    Between non-infectious patietns, we don’t get regular decontamination done, however do so after each MRO patient.
    What I’d like to know is it necessary to decontaminate betwween patietns who have the same strain of MRO?
    My procedureal bay is a large isolation room in our ICU that is NOT used for anythign except my procedures.
    I get our after hours cleaner to do the room at the end of the day also.
    Interested in hearing peoples thoughts on this also.
    Regards,
    Tim..
    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert.
    Clinical Nurse Consultant | Central Venous Access & Parenteral Nutrition Service
    Conjoint Lecturer, University of NSW
    Dept of Intensive Care, Level 2, Clinical Building, Liverpool Hospital, Elizabeth Street, Liverpool, 2170, NSW, Australia
    Tel 02 8738 3603 | Fax 02 8738 3551 | Mob 0409 463 428 | Tim.Spencer@sswahs.nsw.gov.au | Timothy.Spencer@unsw.edu.au

    —–Original Message—–

    Hi all

    Just trying to see what the current thoughts are in regard to management of patients with multi resistant organisms in procedural areas. Do most facilities still have ‘special cleaning’ after procedures on patients colonised or infected with MRSA, ESBL and MRGN’s? I would assume that most facilities would still have special cleaning following procedures on patients colonised or infected with VRE.

    In my opinion, provided we have a good process for cleaning the immediate environment between cases, ‘special cleaning’ for MRSA / ESBL / MRGN is not necessary, and these organisms should be easily removed with normal cleaning techniques. The opportunities for widespread environmental colonisation from patients in procedural areas where patient movement is severely controlled is reasonably low, unlike in ward accommodation situations. VRE as an environmentally hardy organism requires a different approach, however. Does anyone else use this approach?

    Also, should all MRO patients always be placed last on a list?

    Any expert opinions out there?

    Thanks
    Michael

    Michael Wishart
    CNC Infection Control
    Holy Spirit Northside Private Hospital
    627 Rode Road, Chermside,Qld4032
    t: (07) 3326 3068 | f: (07) 3326 3523
    e:Michael.Wishart@hsn.org.au
    w:www.holyspiritnorthside.org.au
    Please consider the environment before printing this email


    WARNING : This email contains information, which is CONFIDENTIAL, and that maybe subject to LEGAL PRIVILEGE. This e-mail and any attachments to it (the “Communication”) is confidential and is for the use only of the intended recipient, and may not duplicated or used by any other party without the express consent of the sender. The Communication may contain copyright material of St Vincent’s Health & Aged Care(“SVHAC”), or any of its related entities or of third parties. If you are not the intended recipient of the Communication, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete the Communication, and do not read, copy, print, retransmit, store or act in reliance on the Communication. Any views expressed in the Communication are those of the individual sender only, unless expressly stated to be those of SVHAC. SVHAC does not guarantee the integrity of the Communication, or that it is free from errors, viruses or interference. Thank-you.

    Message protected by MailGuard: e-mail anti-virus, anti-spam and content filtering.http://www.mailguard.com.au/mg

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    _____________________________________________________________________
    This email has been scanned for the Sydney & South Western Sydney Local Health Districts by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
    Sydney & South Western Sydney Local Health Districts regularly monitor email and attachments to ensure compliance with the NSW Ministry of Health’s Electronic Messaging Policy.

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    in reply to: Dressings for CVADs #69175
    Tim Spencer
    Participant

    Author:
    Tim Spencer

    Position:

    Organisation:

    State:

    Hi Jayne,
    It’s interesting to hear this remark often about ‘allergies’ to
    hypoallergenic dressings, such as S+N IV3000 or 3M’s Tegaderm range.
    In many cases, it is a reaction between the skin prep/antiseptic and the
    adhesive on the dressing because the antiseptic has not been allowed to
    dry correctly, and therefore creates a reaction with the dressing
    adhesive.
    Many people believe this to be an allergy to the dressing!
    It is most often likely not.

    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert.
    Clinical Nurse Consultant | Central Venous Access & Parenteral Nutrition
    Service
    Conjoint Lecturer, University of NSW
    Dept of Intensive Care, Level 2, Clinical Building, Liverpool Hospital,
    Elizabeth Street, Liverpool, 2170, NSW, Australia
    Tel 02 8738 3603 | Fax 02 8738 3551 | Mob 0409 463 428 |
    Tim.Spencer@sswahs.nsw.gov.au | Timothy.Spencer@unsw.edu.au

    ________________________________

    Behalf Of Jayne O’Connor

    Hi All,

    We are currently reviewing our CVAD policies and a question arose around
    the use of sterile gauze and tape for those patients who have allergies
    to transparent semi permeable dressings. Does anyone have advise on how
    frequent the gauze & tape should be changed, apart from the obvious
    soiling etc.

    Look forward to your responses.

    Kind regards

    Jayne

    Jayne O’Connor RN, BSc.

    Clinical Nurse Consultant- Infection Prevention & Control

    Sydney Adventist Hospital,

    185 Fox Valley Rd,.

    Wahroonga,

    NSW 2076.

    information intended for the addressee named above.
    If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any
    dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message
    is prohibited. If you have received this message in error please notify
    the sender immediately, then destroy the original message.
    Any views expressed in this message are solely those of the individual
    sender, except where the sender is specifically authorised
    by Sydney Adventist Hospital to state that they are the views of Sydney
    Adventist Hospital.
    _____________________________________________________________________
    This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by Symantec Hosted Services
    Scanning Services – powered by MessageLabs. For further information
    visit http://www.messagelabs.com

    _____________________________________________________________________
    This email has been scanned for the Sydney & South Western Sydney Local
    Health Districts by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
    Sydney & South Western Sydney Local Health Districts regularly monitor
    email and attachments to ensure compliance with the NSW Ministry of
    Health’s Electronic Messaging Policy.
    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and
    do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a
    new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’
    (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    in reply to: Re: Antiseptic skin preperation for IVC #69125
    Tim Spencer
    Participant

    Author:
    Tim Spencer

    Position:

    Organisation:

    State:

    Hi Matthias,
    This has come up often about the fact that swabsticks are not “sterile”.
    I get asked about it alot.
    The inability to heat treat for sterilisation with IPA is obviously a
    combustable issue. 😉
    However, the sterilisation process also has some destabilisation of the
    CHG (from what I have heard only).
    I am unawwre of ANY other product on the market at the moment that is
    completely sterilised for use (that contains CHG and IPA)
    If you are happy, would you mind forwarding me the correspondence with
    SoluMed as I would like to also investigate this.
    Regards,
    Tim..
    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert.
    Clinical Nurse Consultant | Central Venous Access & Parenteral Nutrition
    Service
    Conjoint Lecturer, University of NSW
    Dept of Intensive Care, Level 2, Clinical Building, Liverpool Hospital,
    Elizabeth Street, Liverpool, 2170, NSW, Australia
    Tel 02 8738 3603 | Fax 02 8738 3551 | Mob 0409 463 428 |
    Tim.Spencer@sswahs.nsw.gov.au | Timothy.Spencer@unsw.edu.au

    ________________________________

    Behalf Of Matthias Maiwald (KKH)

    Dear Tim, dear Colleagues,

    The use of 2% CHG with isopropanol versus 0.5 or 1% makes perfect
    biological and microbiological sense, but there are currently no data
    available from clinical trials (i.e. outcomes-based research) having
    compared the higher versus the lower concentration.

    I wonder about the Solu IV swabsticks that are being mentioned. Earlier,
    in 2008, someone mentioned that they are not labelled as sterile. I
    looked into this a little further and contacted the Canadian
    headquarters, and they also stated that they are not sterile in a strict
    sense. It became obvious that the person from the headquarters who I was
    corresponding with had absolutely not the slightest clue about the
    concepts of sterility.

    It is well known that alcohol products need to be filtered in the
    process of production, in order to exclude bacterial spores. This is a
    well-established standard process, and most companies just simply do it.
    A recent article in ICHE highlighted problems with alcohol pads where
    this apparently had not been done:

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22669227

    For items like the single-use swabsticks (soeaked with alcohol) that are
    packaged, I would assume (but I don’t know for certain) that the plastic
    sticks would have to be irradiated for sterility separately in the
    production process and the alcohol filtered (as stated above).

    At the time, I ended up not following through with the correspondence
    (somewhat frustrated by the Canadian response), but I wonder if anyone
    from this list has looked at this issue (?).

    Best regards, Matthias.

    Matthias Maiwald, MD, FRCPA

    Consultant in Microbiology

    Adj. Assoc. Prof., Natl. Univ. Singapore

    Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

    KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital

    100 Bukit Timah Road

    Singapore 229899

    Tel. +65 6394 8725 (Office)

    Tel. +65 6394 1389 (Laboratory)

    Fax +65 6394 1387

    Behalf Of Tim Spencer

    Robert,

    We have done so and do so for EVERY IV device, not just PIVs.

    2% CHG in 70% IPA – its all evidence based and there is plenty of
    literature to support it as well.

    We previously used 0.5% CHG in 70% IPA.

    We use Solu-IV swabsticks (tinted for insertion and clear for
    maintenance) and the large wipes.

    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert.
    Clinical Nurse Consultant | Central Venous Access & Parenteral Nutrition
    Service

    Conjoint Lecturer, University of NSW
    Dept of Intensive Care, Level 2, Clinical Building, Liverpool Hospital,
    Elizabeth Street, Liverpool, 2170, NSW, Australia
    Tel 02 8738 3603 | Fax 02 8738 3551 | Mob 0409 463 428 |
    Tim.Spencer@sswahs.nsw.gov.au | Timothy.Spencer@unsw.edu.au

    ________________________________

    Behalf Of Robert Robinson

    Good morning

    I would like to know from those facilities who currently uses 70%
    Isopropyl alcohol v/v in 0.5% to 1% Chlorhexidine, and are moving
    towards or have now changed to using 2% Chlorhexidine in alcohol
    specifically for insertion of an Peripheral IVC.

    I am aware of the current recommendations surrounding this but would
    like others comments on this matter.

    regards

    Robert Robinson

    Clinical Nurse Consultant | Infection Control
    Blacktown/Mt. Druitt Hospitals
    Tel 02 9881 8994 | Mob 0408 923 789 |
    robert.robinson@swahs.health.nsw.gov.au

    http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/images/communications/e-signatures/images/N
    SW-Health-Western-Sydney-LHD.jpg

    ___________________________________

    attachments) may be confidential and may also be subject to legal
    professional privilege.

    Unless you are the intended recipient any unauthorised use,
    dissemination,further distribution or reproduction of this communication
    in any form whatsoever, is strictly prohibited.

    If this communication has been sent to you in error, please notify the
    sender by return e-mail and delete and/or destroy your copy of this
    communication (including attachments).

    Any views expressed in this communication are those of the individual
    sender, except where the sender states them to be the views of the
    Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District/Western Sydney Local Health
    District.

    Unless otherwise expressed, it is not represented, warranted or
    guaranteed that the integrity of this communication has been maintained
    nor that the communication is free of virus, errors or interference.

    06/15/12 – 10:03:00
    _____________________________________________________________________
    This email has been scanned for the Sydney & South Western Sydney Local
    Health Districts by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
    Sydney & South Western Sydney Local Health Districts regularly monitor
    email and attachments to ensure compliance with the NSW Ministry of
    Health’s Electronic Messaging Policy.
    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and
    do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a
    new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’
    (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and
    do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a
    new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’
    (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    kkh

    ________________________________

    The information contained in this e-mail and the attachments (if any)
    may be privileged and confidential and is intended solely for the named
    addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not print,
    retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this e-mail or any part
    thereof. Please notify the sender immediately by replying to this e-mail
    and delete all copies of this e-mail and the attachments.

    _____________________________________________________________________
    This email has been scanned for the Sydney & South Western Sydney Local
    Health Districts by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
    Sydney & South Western Sydney Local Health Districts regularly monitor
    email and attachments to ensure compliance with the NSW Ministry of
    Health’s Electronic Messaging Policy.
    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and
    do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a
    new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’
    (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    in reply to: Antiseptic skin preperation for IVC #69119
    Tim Spencer
    Participant

    Author:
    Tim Spencer

    Position:

    Organisation:

    State:

    Robert,
    We have done so and do so for EVERY IV device, not just PIVs.
    2% CHG in 70% IPA – its all evidence based and there is plenty of
    literature to support it as well.
    We previously used 0.5% CHG in 70% IPA.
    We use Solu-IV swabsticks (tinted for insertion and clear for
    maintenance) and the large wipes.
    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert.
    Clinical Nurse Consultant | Central Venous Access & Parenteral Nutrition
    Service
    Conjoint Lecturer, University of NSW
    Dept of Intensive Care, Level 2, Clinical Building, Liverpool Hospital,
    Elizabeth Street, Liverpool, 2170, NSW, Australia
    Tel 02 8738 3603 | Fax 02 8738 3551 | Mob 0409 463 428 |
    Tim.Spencer@sswahs.nsw.gov.au | Timothy.Spencer@unsw.edu.au

    ________________________________

    Behalf Of Robert Robinson

    Good morning

    I would like to know from those facilities who currently uses 70%
    Isopropyl alcohol v/v in 0.5% to 1% Chlorhexidine, and are moving
    towards or have now changed to using 2% Chlorhexidine in alcohol
    specifically for insertion of an Peripheral IVC.

    I am aware of the current recommendations surrounding this but would
    like others comments on this matter.

    regards

    Robert Robinson

    Clinical Nurse Consultant | Infection Control
    Blacktown/Mt. Druitt Hospitals
    Tel 02 9881 8994 | Mob 0408 923 789 |
    robert.robinson@swahs.health.nsw.gov.au

    http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/images/communications/e-signatures/images/N
    SW-Health-Western-Sydney-LHD.jpg

    ___________________________________

    attachments) may be confidential and may also be subject to legal
    professional privilege.

    Unless you are the intended recipient any unauthorised use,
    dissemination,further distribution or reproduction of this communication
    in any form whatsoever, is strictly prohibited.

    If this communication has been sent to you in error, please notify the
    sender by return e-mail and delete and/or destroy your copy of this
    communication (including attachments).

    Any views expressed in this communication are those of the individual
    sender, except where the sender states them to be the views of the
    Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District/Western Sydney Local Health
    District.

    Unless otherwise expressed, it is not represented, warranted or
    guaranteed that the integrity of this communication has been maintained
    nor that the communication is free of virus, errors or interference.

    06/15/12 – 10:03:00
    _____________________________________________________________________
    This email has been scanned for the Sydney & South Western Sydney Local
    Health Districts by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
    Sydney & South Western Sydney Local Health Districts regularly monitor
    email and attachments to ensure compliance with the NSW Ministry of
    Health’s Electronic Messaging Policy.
    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and
    do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a
    new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’
    (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Tim Spencer
    Participant

    Author:
    Tim Spencer

    Position:

    Organisation:

    State:

    In reply to general CHG comments so far;
    CHG must be relatively safe for in vivo use, as it is impreganted into
    many of our vascular devices (CVC and PICCs) commonly used these days –
    there has only been relatively few isolated cases in Japan and the USA
    from several years ago.

    Matthias,
    They might be fundamentally different things, but as a lead vascular
    access nurse, I think compliance is more of the issue between healthcare
    practitioners and their standard of care, than of two different types of
    decontamination issues. I agree with you that 70% IPA is still widely
    accepted and used for port decontamination, but current best practices
    also recommends the use of CHG and IPA.
    CDC Guidelines (2011) pp.19-20 recommend;
    4. Minimize contamination risk by scrubbing the access port with an
    appropriate antiseptic (chlorhexidine, povidone iodine, an iodophor, or
    70% alcohol) and accessing the port only with sterile devices [189, 192,
    194-196]. Category IA

    Although to monitor compliance more effectively CDC also recommend;

    Use hospital-specific or collaborative-based performance improvement
    initiatives in which multifaceted strategies are “bundled” together to
    improve compliance with evidence-based recommended practices [15, 69,
    70, 201-205]. Category IB

    Regards,

    T..

    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert.
    Clinical Nurse Consultant | Central Venous Access & Parenteral Nutrition
    Service
    Conjoint Lecturer, University of NSW
    Dept of Critical Care, Level 2, Clinical Building, Liverpool Hospital,
    Elizabeth Street, Liverpool, 2170, NSW, Australia
    Tel 02 8738 3603 | Fax 02 8738 3551 | Mob 0409 463 428 |
    Tim.Spencer@sswahs.nsw.gov.au | Timothy.Spencer@unsw.edu.au

    ________________________________

    Behalf Of Matthias Maiwald (KKH)

    Dear Collagues,

    Please bear in mind that (a) skin antisepsis before line insertion and
    during maintenance and (b) antisepsis for access ports are two
    fundamentally different things.

    While the evidence for chlorhexidine plus alcohol for (a) appears solid
    (although not quite as solid as commonly purported), there is much
    weaker evidence for adding chlorhexidine to alcohol for (b).

    Best regards, Matthias.

    Matthias Maiwald, MD, FRCPA

    Consultant in Microbiology

    Adj. Assoc. Prof., Natl. Univ. Singapore

    Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

    KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital

    100 Bukit Timah Road

    Singapore 229899

    Tel. +65 6394 8725 (Office)

    Tel. +65 6394 1389 (Laboratory)

    Fax +65 6394 1387

    ________________________________

    Tim Spencer [Tim.Spencer@SSWAHS.NSW.GOV.AU]

    Matt,
    You are correct, though I would recommend 2% over 0.5% unless
    allergy/sensitivity (as stated)
    Most manufacturers are now only producing 2%CHG & IPA swabs/sticks.
    I havent yet seen any mini ampules like the 0.5% CHG & IPA in 25ml.
    🙂
    T..
    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert.
    Clinical Nurse Consultant | Central Venous Access & Parenteral Nutrition
    Service
    Conjoint Lecturer, University of NSW
    Dept of Critical Care, Level 2, Clinical Building, Liverpool Hospital,
    Elizabeth Street, Liverpool, 2170, NSW, Australia
    Tel 02 8738 3603 | Fax 02 8738 3551 | Mob 0409 463 428 |
    Tim.Spencer@sswahs.nsw.gov.au | Timothy.Spencer@unsw.edu.au

    ________________________________

    Behalf Of Richards, Matthew

    Tim
    just a point of reference
    The CDC 2011 guidelines recommendation for skin prep prior to the
    insertion of a CVC is “>0.5% CHG with alcohol….if there is a
    contraindication to CHG, tincture of iodine, an iodophor, or 70% alcohol
    can be used as an alternative”. The reality is 2% CHG in 70% alcohol is
    most commonly available and used.
    The recommended CDC guidleiens for peripheral skin prep is with an
    antiseptic “70% alcohol….or alcoholic CHG gluconate solution”
    regards

    Matthew Richards
    Clinical Nurse Consultant
    Infection Prevention and Surveillance Service
    Melbourne Health
    T: 9342 8325 F: 9342 8484
    http://info2.mh.org.au/IPSS/NewWEB/default.htm

    ________________________________

    Behalf Of Tim Spencer
    cleaning protocol

    Hi Jayne,
    Currently, the CDC Guidelines, along with NICE (UK), SHEA (USA), INS
    (USA) and AVA (USA), ESPEN (Europe) and IVNNZ (New Zealand) all
    recommend 2% CHG with 70% IPA.
    It’s is pretty much the worldwide standard for skin antisepsis prior to
    inserion of a IV device (peripheral or central), as well as
    hub/cap/valve decontamination on any IV device.
    Never heard of it being injected into the patient! I would be interested
    to see your ID physicians supportive evidence to show any accidental
    injection of CHG & IPA into the patient and any detriments it may have.
    The evidence speaks correctly. I would base your policy from
    “evidence-based research and practices’, not speculation from various
    individuals.

    There is plenty of supportive literature.
    Regards,
    Tim..
    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert.
    Clinical Nurse Consultant | Central Venous Access & Parenteral Nutrition
    Service
    Conjoint Lecturer, University of NSW
    Dept of Critical Care, Level 2, Clinical Building, Liverpool Hospital,
    Elizabeth Street, Liverpool, 2170, NSW, Australia
    Tel 02 8738 3603 | Fax 02 8738 3551 | Mob 0409 463 428 |
    Tim.Spencer@sswahs.nsw.gov.au | Timothy.Spencer@unsw.edu.au

    ________________________________

    Behalf Of Jayne OConnor

    Dear All,

    We are currently revising our CVC policy and just wondering what
    everyone used for cleaning the ports? All evidence points to 2%
    Chlorhexidine in 70% alcohol, but we have had conflicting advice from
    our ID physicians due to safety issues of injecting chlorhexidine into
    lines?

    Look forward to responses.

    Kind Regards

    Jayne

    Jayne O’Connor RN, BSc.in Infection Control

    Clinical Nurse Consultant- Infection Prevention & Control

    Sydney Adventist Hospital,

    185 Fox Valley Rd,.

    Wahroonga,

    NSW 2076.

    information intended for the addressee named above.
    If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any
    dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message
    is prohibited. If you have received this message in error please notify
    the sender immediately, then destroy the original message.
    Any views expressed in this message are solely those of the individual
    sender, except where the sender is specifically authorised
    by Sydney Adventist Hospital to state that they are the views of Sydney
    Adventist Hospital.
    _____________________________________________________________________
    This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by Symantec Hosted Services
    Scanning Services – powered by MessageLabs. For further information
    visit http://www.messagelabs.com

    _____________________________________________________________________
    This email has been scanned for the Sydney & South Western Sydney Local
    Health Districts by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
    Sydney & South Western Sydney Local Health Districts regularly monitor
    email and attachments to ensure compliance with the NSW Ministry of
    Health’s Electronic Messaging Policy.
    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and
    do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a
    new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’
    (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    ________________________________

    Northern/Melbourne/Western Health e-mail network. The sender cannot be
    validated. Caution is advised. Contact IT Services (+61 3 ) 9342 8888
    for more information.

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and
    do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a
    new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’
    (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    _____________________________________________________________________
    This email has been scanned for the Sydney & South Western Sydney Local
    Health Districts by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
    Sydney & South Western Sydney Local Health Districts regularly monitor
    email and attachments to ensure compliance with the NSW Ministry of
    Health’s Electronic Messaging Policy.
    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and
    do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a
    new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’
    (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and
    do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a
    new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’
    (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    kkh

    ________________________________

    The information contained in this e-mail and the attachments (if any)
    may be privileged and confidential and is intended solely for the named
    addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not print,
    retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this e-mail or any part
    thereof. Please notify the sender immediately by replying to this e-mail
    and delete all copies of this e-mail and the attachments.

    _____________________________________________________________________
    This email has been scanned for the Sydney & South Western Sydney Local
    Health Districts by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
    Sydney & South Western Sydney Local Health Districts regularly monitor
    email and attachments to ensure compliance with the NSW Ministry of
    Health’s Electronic Messaging Policy.
    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and
    do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a
    new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’
    (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Tim Spencer
    Participant

    Author:
    Tim Spencer

    Position:

    Organisation:

    State:

    I think the big take home point of this too is regardless of the
    antiseptic of choice used, you need to create friction on the hubs and
    good skin contact prior to device insertion.
    Iodine-based solutions however can clog the hub thread and you can get a
    buildup of sticky iodine which is a potential risk for device breakages
    i.e folk use forceps to unclamp sets/valves/caps.
    We follow a “SCRUB THE HUB” for 15secs minimum prior to accessing
    devices.
    Worked well as a program in the US also a decade ago.
    T..
    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert.
    Clinical Nurse Consultant | Central Venous Access & Parenteral Nutrition
    Service
    Conjoint Lecturer, University of NSW
    Dept of Critical Care, Level 2, Clinical Building, Liverpool Hospital,
    Elizabeth Street, Liverpool, 2170, NSW, Australia
    Tel 02 8738 3603 | Fax 02 8738 3551 | Mob 0409 463 428 |
    Tim.Spencer@sswahs.nsw.gov.au | Timothy.Spencer@unsw.edu.au

    ________________________________

    Behalf Of Michael Wishart

    Matthew
    The original discussion is concerning port disinfection, and the same
    CDC HICPAC guidelines you refer to state:
    ‘Minimize contamination risk by scrubbing the access port with an
    appropriate antiseptic (chlorhexidine, povidone iodine, an iodophor, or
    70% alcohol) and accessing the port only with sterile devices [189, 192,
    194-196]. Category IA’
    Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related
    Infections, 2011
    http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/pdf/guidelines/bsi-guidelines-2011.pdf
    Cheers
    Michael
    Michael Wishart
    Public Health Nurse,Communicable Disease Control
    Logan West Moreton PHU
    Ph 34131200 Fax 34131221
    To contact Nursing team:
    LWM_PHN@health.qld.gov.au

    >>> “Richards, Matthew” 25/05/2012 8:30 am
    >>>

    Tim
    just a point of reference
    The CDC 2011 guidelines recommendation for skin prep prior to the
    insertion of a CVC is “>0.5% CHG with alcohol….if there is a
    contraindication to CHG, tincture of iodine, an iodophor, or 70% alcohol
    can be used as an alternative”. The reality is 2% CHG in 70% alcohol is
    most commonly available and used.
    The recommended CDC guidleiens for peripheral skin prep is with an
    antiseptic “70% alcohol….or alcoholic CHG gluconate solution”
    regards

    Matthew Richards
    Clinical Nurse Consultant
    Infection Prevention and Surveillance Service
    Melbourne Health
    T: 9342 8325 F: 9342 8484
    http://info2.mh.org.au/IPSS/NewWEB/default.htm

    ________________________________

    Behalf Of Tim Spencer
    cleaning protocol

    Hi Jayne,
    Currently, the CDC Guidelines, along with NICE (UK), SHEA (USA), INS
    (USA) and AVA (USA), ESPEN (Europe) and IVNNZ (New Zealand) all
    recommend 2% CHG with 70% IPA.
    It’s is pretty much the worldwide standard for skin antisepsis prior to
    inserion of a IV device (peripheral or central), as well as
    hub/cap/valve decontamination on any IV device.
    Never heard of it being injected into the patient! I would be interested
    to see your ID physicians supportive evidence to show any accidental
    injection of CHG & IPA into the patient and any detriments it may have.
    The evidence speaks correctly. I would base your policy from
    “evidence-based research and practices’, not speculation from various
    individuals.

    There is plenty of supportive literature.
    Regards,
    Tim..
    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert.
    Clinical Nurse Consultant | Central Venous Access & Parenteral Nutrition
    Service
    Conjoint Lecturer, University of NSW
    Dept of Critical Care, Level 2, Clinical Building, Liverpool Hospital,
    Elizabeth Street, Liverpool, 2170, NSW, Australia
    Tel 02 8738 3603 | Fax 02 8738 3551 | Mob 0409 463 428 |
    Tim.Spencer@sswahs.nsw.gov.au | Timothy.Spencer@unsw.edu.au

    ________________________________

    Behalf Of Jayne OConnor

    Dear All,

    We are currently revising our CVC policy and just wondering what
    everyone used for cleaning the ports? All evidence points to 2%
    Chlorhexidine in 70% alcohol, but we have had conflicting advice from
    our ID physicians due to safety issues of injecting chlorhexidine into
    lines?

    Look forward to responses.

    Kind Regards

    Jayne

    Jayne O’Connor RN, BSc.in Infection Control

    Clinical Nurse Consultant- Infection Prevention & Control

    Sydney Adventist Hospital,

    185 Fox Valley Rd,.

    Wahroonga,

    NSW 2076.

    information intended for the addressee named above.
    If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any
    dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message
    is prohibited. If you have received this message in error please notify
    the sender immediately, then destroy the original message.
    Any views expressed in this message are solely those of the individual
    sender, except where the sender is specifically authorised
    by Sydney Adventist Hospital to state that they are the views of Sydney
    Adventist Hospital.
    _____________________________________________________________________
    This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by Symantec Hosted Services
    Scanning Services – powered by MessageLabs. For further information
    visit http://www.messagelabs.com

    _____________________________________________________________________
    This email has been scanned for the Sydney & South Western Sydney Local
    Health Districts by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
    Sydney & South Western Sydney Local Health Districts regularly monitor
    email and attachments to ensure compliance with the NSW Ministry of
    Health’s Electronic Messaging Policy.
    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and
    do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a
    new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’
    (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    ________________________________

    Northern/Melbourne/Western Health e-mail network. The sender cannot be
    validated. Caution is advised. Contact IT Services (+61 3 ) 9342 8888
    for more information.

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and
    do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a
    new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’
    (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and
    do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a
    new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’
    (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    ************************************************************************
    ********

    This email, including any attachments sent with it, is confidential and
    for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). This confidentiality is
    not waived or lost, if you receive it and you are not the intended
    recipient(s), or if it is transmitted/received in error.

    Any unauthorised use, alteration, disclosure, distribution or review of
    this email is strictly prohibited. The information contained in this
    email, including any attachment sent with it, may be subject to a
    statutory duty of confidentiality if it relates to health service
    matters.

    If you are not the intended recipient(s), or if you have received this
    email in error, you are asked to immediately notify the sender by
    telephone collect on Australia +61 1800 198 175 or by return email. You
    should also delete this email, and any copies, from your computer system
    network and destroy any hard copies produced.

    If not an intended recipient of this email, you must not copy,
    distribute or take any action(s) that relies on it; any form of
    disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication of this email
    is also prohibited.

    Although Queensland Health takes all reasonable steps to ensure this
    email does not contain malicious software, Queensland Health does not
    accept responsibility for the consequences if any person’s computer
    inadvertently suffers any disruption to services, loss of information,
    harm or is infected with a virus, other malicious computer programme or
    code that may occur as a consequence of receiving this email.

    Unless stated otherwise, this email represents only the views of the
    sender and not the views of the Queensland Government.

    ************************************************************************
    **********

    _____________________________________________________________________
    This email has been scanned for the Sydney & South Western Sydney Local
    Health Districts by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
    Sydney & South Western Sydney Local Health Districts regularly monitor
    email and attachments to ensure compliance with the NSW Ministry of
    Health’s Electronic Messaging Policy.
    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and
    do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a
    new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’
    (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Tim Spencer
    Participant

    Author:
    Tim Spencer

    Position:

    Organisation:

    State:

    Matt,
    You are correct, though I would recommend 2% over 0.5% unless
    allergy/sensitivity (as stated)
    Most manufacturers are now only producing 2%CHG & IPA swabs/sticks.
    I havent yet seen any mini ampules like the 0.5% CHG & IPA in 25ml.
    🙂
    T..
    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert.
    Clinical Nurse Consultant | Central Venous Access & Parenteral Nutrition
    Service
    Conjoint Lecturer, University of NSW
    Dept of Critical Care, Level 2, Clinical Building, Liverpool Hospital,
    Elizabeth Street, Liverpool, 2170, NSW, Australia
    Tel 02 8738 3603 | Fax 02 8738 3551 | Mob 0409 463 428 |
    Tim.Spencer@sswahs.nsw.gov.au | Timothy.Spencer@unsw.edu.au

    ________________________________

    Behalf Of Richards, Matthew

    Tim
    just a point of reference
    The CDC 2011 guidelines recommendation for skin prep prior to the
    insertion of a CVC is “>0.5% CHG with alcohol….if there is a
    contraindication to CHG, tincture of iodine, an iodophor, or 70% alcohol
    can be used as an alternative”. The reality is 2% CHG in 70% alcohol is
    most commonly available and used.
    The recommended CDC guidleiens for peripheral skin prep is with an
    antiseptic “70% alcohol….or alcoholic CHG gluconate solution”
    regards

    Matthew Richards
    Clinical Nurse Consultant
    Infection Prevention and Surveillance Service
    Melbourne Health
    T: 9342 8325 F: 9342 8484
    http://info2.mh.org.au/IPSS/NewWEB/default.htm

    ________________________________

    Behalf Of Tim Spencer
    cleaning protocol

    Hi Jayne,
    Currently, the CDC Guidelines, along with NICE (UK), SHEA (USA), INS
    (USA) and AVA (USA), ESPEN (Europe) and IVNNZ (New Zealand) all
    recommend 2% CHG with 70% IPA.
    It’s is pretty much the worldwide standard for skin antisepsis prior to
    inserion of a IV device (peripheral or central), as well as
    hub/cap/valve decontamination on any IV device.
    Never heard of it being injected into the patient! I would be interested
    to see your ID physicians supportive evidence to show any accidental
    injection of CHG & IPA into the patient and any detriments it may have.
    The evidence speaks correctly. I would base your policy from
    “evidence-based research and practices’, not speculation from various
    individuals.

    There is plenty of supportive literature.
    Regards,
    Tim..
    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert.
    Clinical Nurse Consultant | Central Venous Access & Parenteral Nutrition
    Service
    Conjoint Lecturer, University of NSW
    Dept of Critical Care, Level 2, Clinical Building, Liverpool Hospital,
    Elizabeth Street, Liverpool, 2170, NSW, Australia
    Tel 02 8738 3603 | Fax 02 8738 3551 | Mob 0409 463 428 |
    Tim.Spencer@sswahs.nsw.gov.au | Timothy.Spencer@unsw.edu.au

    ________________________________

    Behalf Of Jayne OConnor

    Dear All,

    We are currently revising our CVC policy and just wondering what
    everyone used for cleaning the ports? All evidence points to 2%
    Chlorhexidine in 70% alcohol, but we have had conflicting advice from
    our ID physicians due to safety issues of injecting chlorhexidine into
    lines?

    Look forward to responses.

    Kind Regards

    Jayne

    Jayne O’Connor RN, BSc.in Infection Control

    Clinical Nurse Consultant- Infection Prevention & Control

    Sydney Adventist Hospital,

    185 Fox Valley Rd,.

    Wahroonga,

    NSW 2076.

    information intended for the addressee named above.
    If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any
    dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message
    is prohibited. If you have received this message in error please notify
    the sender immediately, then destroy the original message.
    Any views expressed in this message are solely those of the individual
    sender, except where the sender is specifically authorised
    by Sydney Adventist Hospital to state that they are the views of Sydney
    Adventist Hospital.
    _____________________________________________________________________
    This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by Symantec Hosted Services
    Scanning Services – powered by MessageLabs. For further information
    visit http://www.messagelabs.com

    _____________________________________________________________________
    This email has been scanned for the Sydney & South Western Sydney Local
    Health Districts by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
    Sydney & South Western Sydney Local Health Districts regularly monitor
    email and attachments to ensure compliance with the NSW Ministry of
    Health’s Electronic Messaging Policy.
    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and
    do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a
    new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’
    (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    ________________________________

    Northern/Melbourne/Western Health e-mail network. The sender cannot be
    validated. Caution is advised. Contact IT Services (+61 3 ) 9342 8888
    for more information.

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and
    do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a
    new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’
    (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    _____________________________________________________________________
    This email has been scanned for the Sydney & South Western Sydney Local
    Health Districts by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
    Sydney & South Western Sydney Local Health Districts regularly monitor
    email and attachments to ensure compliance with the NSW Ministry of
    Health’s Electronic Messaging Policy.
    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and
    do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a
    new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’
    (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Tim Spencer
    Participant

    Author:
    Tim Spencer

    Position:

    Organisation:

    State:

    Yes, an unfortunate incident.
    And on that DOH Safety Alert, we changed ALL our CHG & IPA to red tinted
    solution.
    We also use the large and small lollipops.
    However, I think the swabs are still clear – not sure if they come in a
    tinted solution.
    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert.
    Clinical Nurse Consultant | Central Venous Access & Parenteral Nutrition
    Service
    Conjoint Lecturer, University of NSW
    Dept of Critical Care, Level 2, Clinical Building, Liverpool Hospital,
    Elizabeth Street, Liverpool, 2170, NSW, Australia
    Tel 02 8738 3603 | Fax 02 8738 3551 | Mob 0409 463 428 |
    Tim.Spencer@sswahs.nsw.gov.au | Timothy.Spencer@unsw.edu.au

    ________________________________

    Behalf Of Prue Wright

    Hi Jayne,

    Recently there was a case when a woman was injected with clear
    chlorhexidine by error – she was having an epidural inserted .

    Because of this; it is preferred that prep for lines be dyed. This also
    has the advantage of being able to see what parts of the skin have been
    prepped.

    The ICU I used to work in used “lollipops”; so there could be no error.

    Regards

    Prue Wright

    Infection Control Co-ordinator

    Hurstville Private

    Behalf Of Tim Spencer

    Hi Jayne,

    Currently, the CDC Guidelines, along with NICE (UK), SHEA (USA), INS
    (USA) and AVA (USA), ESPEN (Europe) and IVNNZ (New Zealand) all
    recommend 2% CHG with 70% IPA.

    It’s is pretty much the worldwide standard for skin antisepsis prior to
    inserion of a IV device (peripheral or central), as well as
    hub/cap/valve decontamination on any IV device.

    Never heard of it being injected into the patient! I would be interested
    to see your ID physicians supportive evidence to show any accidental
    injection of CHG & IPA into the patient and any detriments it may have.

    The evidence speaks correctly. I would base your policy from
    “evidence-based research and practices’, not speculation from various
    individuals.

    There is plenty of supportive literature.

    Regards,

    Tim..

    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert.
    Clinical Nurse Consultant | Central Venous Access & Parenteral Nutrition
    Service

    Conjoint Lecturer, University of NSW
    Dept of Critical Care, Level 2, Clinical Building, Liverpool Hospital,
    Elizabeth Street, Liverpool, 2170, NSW, Australia
    Tel 02 8738 3603 | Fax 02 8738 3551 | Mob 0409 463 428 |
    Tim.Spencer@sswahs.nsw.gov.au | Timothy.Spencer@unsw.edu.au

    ________________________________

    Behalf Of Jayne OConnor

    Dear All,

    We are currently revising our CVC policy and just wondering what
    everyone used for cleaning the ports? All evidence points to 2%
    Chlorhexidine in 70% alcohol, but we have had conflicting advice from
    our ID physicians due to safety issues of injecting chlorhexidine into
    lines?

    Look forward to responses.

    Kind Regards

    Jayne

    Jayne O’Connor RN, BSc.in Infection Control

    Clinical Nurse Consultant- Infection Prevention & Control

    Sydney Adventist Hospital,

    185 Fox Valley Rd,.

    Wahroonga,

    NSW 2076.

    information intended for the addressee named above.
    If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any
    dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message
    is prohibited. If you have received this message in error please notify
    the sender immediately, then destroy the original message.
    Any views expressed in this message are solely those of the individual
    sender, except where the sender is specifically authorised
    by Sydney Adventist Hospital to state that they are the views of Sydney
    Adventist Hospital.
    _____________________________________________________________________
    This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by Symantec Hosted Services
    Scanning Services – powered by MessageLabs. For further information
    visit http://www.messagelabs.com

    _____________________________________________________________________
    This email has been scanned for the Sydney & South Western Sydney Local
    Health Districts by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
    Sydney & South Western Sydney Local Health Districts regularly monitor
    email and attachments to ensure compliance with the NSW Ministry of
    Health’s Electronic Messaging Policy.
    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and
    do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a
    new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’
    (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and
    do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a
    new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’
    (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    _____________________________________________________________________
    This email has been scanned for the Sydney & South Western Sydney Local
    Health Districts by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
    Sydney & South Western Sydney Local Health Districts regularly monitor
    email and attachments to ensure compliance with the NSW Ministry of
    Health’s Electronic Messaging Policy.
    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and
    do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a
    new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’
    (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    in reply to: cvc & other IV device bung/port cleaning protocol #69032
    Tim Spencer
    Participant

    Author:
    Tim Spencer

    Position:

    Organisation:

    State:

    Hi Jayne,
    Currently, the CDC Guidelines, along with NICE (UK), SHEA (USA), INS
    (USA) and AVA (USA), ESPEN (Europe) and IVNNZ (New Zealand) all
    recommend 2% CHG with 70% IPA.
    It’s is pretty much the worldwide standard for skin antisepsis prior to
    inserion of a IV device (peripheral or central), as well as
    hub/cap/valve decontamination on any IV device.
    Never heard of it being injected into the patient! I would be interested
    to see your ID physicians supportive evidence to show any accidental
    injection of CHG & IPA into the patient and any detriments it may have.
    The evidence speaks correctly. I would base your policy from
    “evidence-based research and practices’, not speculation from various
    individuals.

    There is plenty of supportive literature.
    Regards,
    Tim..
    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert.
    Clinical Nurse Consultant | Central Venous Access & Parenteral Nutrition
    Service
    Conjoint Lecturer, University of NSW
    Dept of Critical Care, Level 2, Clinical Building, Liverpool Hospital,
    Elizabeth Street, Liverpool, 2170, NSW, Australia
    Tel 02 8738 3603 | Fax 02 8738 3551 | Mob 0409 463 428 |
    Tim.Spencer@sswahs.nsw.gov.au | Timothy.Spencer@unsw.edu.au

    ________________________________

    Behalf Of Jayne OConnor

    Dear All,

    We are currently revising our CVC policy and just wondering what
    everyone used for cleaning the ports? All evidence points to 2%
    Chlorhexidine in 70% alcohol, but we have had conflicting advice from
    our ID physicians due to safety issues of injecting chlorhexidine into
    lines?

    Look forward to responses.

    Kind Regards

    Jayne

    Jayne O’Connor RN, BSc.in Infection Control

    Clinical Nurse Consultant- Infection Prevention & Control

    Sydney Adventist Hospital,

    185 Fox Valley Rd,.

    Wahroonga,

    NSW 2076.

    information intended for the addressee named above.
    If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any
    dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message
    is prohibited. If you have received this message in error please notify
    the sender immediately, then destroy the original message.
    Any views expressed in this message are solely those of the individual
    sender, except where the sender is specifically authorised
    by Sydney Adventist Hospital to state that they are the views of Sydney
    Adventist Hospital.
    _____________________________________________________________________
    This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by Symantec Hosted Services
    Scanning Services – powered by MessageLabs. For further information
    visit http://www.messagelabs.com

    _____________________________________________________________________
    This email has been scanned for the Sydney & South Western Sydney Local
    Health Districts by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
    Sydney & South Western Sydney Local Health Districts regularly monitor
    email and attachments to ensure compliance with the NSW Ministry of
    Health’s Electronic Messaging Policy.
    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and
    do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a
    new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’
    (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    in reply to: Audits #68869
    Tim Spencer
    Participant

    Author:
    Tim Spencer

    Position:

    Organisation:

    State:

    Hi All,
    Here is a link to the Smith+Nephew website where several key clinicians
    in vascular access designed several tools for audit in 2006.
    There are charts for peripheral, central, PICCs as well as a vascular
    access device selection tool and phletbitis scoring system.
    These are free to downlaod in PDF format if you would like them.
    I hope you find these useful.
    http://wound.smith-nephew.com/au/node.asp?NodeId4476
    Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert.
    Clinical Nurse Consultant | Central Venous Access & Parenteral Nutrition
    Service
    Conjoint Lecturer, University of NSW
    Dept of Intensive Care, Level 2, Clinical Building, Liverpool Hospital,
    Elizabeth Street, Liverpool, 2170, NSW, Australia
    Tel 02 8738 3603 | Fax 02 8738 3551 | Mob 0409 463 428 |
    Tim.Spencer@sswahs.nsw.gov.au

    ________________________________

    Behalf Of Carien Coleman

    Hi Jane,

    It would be really nice if you could email me your audit tools.

    Thank you,

    Carien

    Carien Coleman | Infection Control CNC

    The Sunshine Coast Private Hospital

    Syd Lingard Drive | BUDERIM QLD 4556

    PO Box 5050 | Maroochydore BC QLD 4558

    T: (07) 5430 3245 | F: (07) 5430 3436

    E: carien.coleman@uchealth.com.au

    ________________________________

    Behalf Of Jane Hellsten

    Happy to share our audit tools for insertion of peripheral IV cannulae
    and also management of peripheral IV’s.

    If anyone is interested please email me. Our tools are based on our
    in-house protocols which are referenced to CDC guidelines.

    14.12.11

    Jane Hellsten, CICP

    Manager, Infection Prevention Control

    Infectious Diseases Service

    Loddon Mallee Infection Control Resource Centre

    Bendigo Health

    Behalf Of Tribe, Ingrid (Health)

    We are currently reviewing our audit tool for monitoring compliance with
    guidelines for the management of peripheral venous catheters.

    Are there any “gold standard” examples available for review? In
    anticipation of your response, thank you.

    Kind regards

    Ingrid Tribe

    Infection Control Service

    Flinders Medical Centre

    Bedford Park SA 5152

    Australia

    T: (08) 82045051

    F: (08) 82044733

    E: ingrid.tribe@health.sa.gov.au

    Infection prevention is everybody’s business

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and
    do not represent the opinion of AICA.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a
    new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’
    (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    ************************************************************************
    *********

    Although this email has been scanned for viruses please ensure that due
    care

    is taken before opening any attachments. Do you know the sender?

    Do not open any attachments that you are not expecting!

    ************************************************************************
    *********

    _________________________________________________________________

    Uniting Care Health Email Disclaimer:
    http://www.uchealth.com.au/disclaimer

    _____________________________________________________________________
    This email has been scanned for the Sydney & South Western Sydney Local
    Health Districts by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
    Sydney & South Western Sydney Local Health Districts regularly monitor
    email and attachments to ensure compliance with the NSW Ministry of
    Health’s Electronic Messaging Policy.
    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and
    do not represent the opinion of AICA.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a
    new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’
    (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au Messages posted to this
    list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do not represent the
    opinion of AICA.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a
    new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’
    (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do not represent the opinion of AICA.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    in reply to: hanging of IV lines #68742
    Tim Spencer
    Participant

    Author:
    Tim Spencer

    Position:

    Organisation:

    State:

    I presume you are talking about the minibag and giving set
    administration method?
    Leaving disconnected IV sets is not great practice – I certainly would
    not be encouraging it at all.
    Check the CDC guidelines for more definative info also.
    INS (USA) guidelines state;
    43. ADMINISTRATION SET
    CHANGE
    Standard
    43.1 Administration set changes shall be performed routinely, based on
    factors such as type of solution administered, type of the infusion
    (continuous versus intermittent), immediately upon suspected
    contamination, or when the integrity of the product or system has been
    compromised.
    43.2 The administration set shall be changed whenever the peripheral
    catheter site is rotated or when a new central vascular access device is
    placed.
    43.3 Add-on devices used as part of the administration set, such as
    single- and multilumen extension sets and filters, shall be changed at
    the same time as the administration set.
    43.4 The frequency of performing administration set changes and the
    system used to promote adherence to administration set change (eg,
    labeling/electronic) shall be established in organizational policies,
    procedures,
    and/or practice guidelines.
    43.5 A vented administration set shall be used for solutions supplied in
    glass or semi-rigid containers, and a nonvented administration set shall
    be used for plastic fluid containers.
    43.6 All administration sets shall be of luer-lock design to ensure a
    secure junction.

    Practice Criteria
    I. General
    A. The use of add-on devices for administration sets should be minimized
    as each device is a potential source of contamination, misuse, and
    disconnection; it is preferable to use an administration set with
    devices as an integral part of the set (see Standard 26, Add-on
    Devices).1 (V)

    Practice Criteria
    II. Primary and Secondary Continuous Infusions
    A. Primary and secondary continuous administration sets used to
    administer fluids other than lipid, blood, or blood products should be
    changed no more frequently than every 96 hours. There is strong evidence
    that changing the administration sets more frequently does not decrease
    the risk of infection.2-3 (I)
    B. Extending the administration set change to every 7 days may be
    considered when an anti-infective central vascular access device (CVAD)
    is being used or if fluids that enhance microbial growth are not
    administered through the set.3,4 (II)
    C. If a secondary administration set is detached from the primary
    administration set, the secondary administration set is considered a
    primary intermittent administration set and should be changed every 24
    hours (see
    Practice Criteria III, Primary Intermittent Infusions).1 (V)
    D. When compatibility of infusates is verified, use of secondary
    administration sets that use back-priming infusion methods are preferred
    due to reduced need for disconnecting secondary intermittent
    administration sets.1 (V)

    Practice Criteria
    III. Primary Intermittent Infusions
    A. Primary intermittent administration sets should be changed every 24
    hours. When an intermittent infusion is repeatedly disconnected and
    reconnected for the infusion, there is increased risk of contamination
    at the catheter hub, needleless connector, and the male luer end of the
    administration set, potentially increasing risk for catheter-related
    bloodstream infection. There is an absence of studies addressing
    administration set changes for intermittent infusions. In a
    meta-analysis of 12 randomized, controlled trials that supported
    increasing the time interval for administration set changes to 96 hours,
    at least 2 of the studies excluded administration sets used for
    heparinlocked catheters and in sets disconnected for more than 4 hours.
    In several others, exclusions were not stated.1,5 (V)
    B. A new, sterile, compatible covering device should be aseptically
    attached to the end of the administration set after each intermittent
    use. The practice of attaching the exposed end of the administration set
    to a port on the same set (“looping”) should be avoided.1,5 (V)

    I hope this is usefiul.
    Tim Spencer
    Clinical Nurse Consultant
    Central Venous Access & Parenteral Nutrition Service
    Conjoint Lecturer, University of NSW
    Department of Intensive Care
    Liverpool Hospital
    Locked Bag 7103
    Liverpool BC NSW 2170
    AUSTRALIA

    Please note the prefix change in phone/fax numbers

    ________________________________

    Behalf Of Beckingham, Wendy

    Good morning

    Our question is: does anyone have a policy on when to change IV lines
    that are used for antibiotics and then left to hang disconnected by the
    patients bed side?

    Would love to hear from you if you do.

    Wendy Beckingham
    CNC Infection Prevention and Control
    ph. (02) 6244 3695 or pager 50390
    e. wendy.beckingham@act.gov.au

    Care Excellence Collaboration Integrity

    GERMS CAN KILL…

    ———————————————————————–
    This email, and any attachments, may be confidential and also
    privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
    sender and delete all copies of this transmission along with any
    attachments immediately. You should not copy or use it for any purpose,
    nor disclose its contents to any other person.
    ———————————————————————–

    _____________________________________________________________________
    This email has been scanned for the Sydney South West Area Health
    Service by the MessageLabs Email Security System. SSWAHS regularly
    monitors emails and attachments to ensure compliance with the NSW
    Government’s Electronic Messaging Policy.
    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and
    do not represent the opinion of AICA.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a
    new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’
    (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do not represent the opinion of AICA.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

Viewing 11 posts - 31 through 41 (of 41 total)