Select Page

Glenys Harrington

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 208 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Glenys Harrington
    Participant

    Author:
    Glenys Harrington

    Email:
    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    Organisation:
    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    State:

    Was this co-sponsored by the college?

    Glenys

    Glenys Harrington

    Consultant

    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    PO Box 5202

    Middle Park

    Victoria, 3206

    Australia

    H: +61 3 96902216

    M: +61 404 816 434

    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    ABN 47533508426

    Of Michael Wishart
    Immunisation Ideas Set to Increase Awareness

    [Posted on behalf of Marija Juraja, ACIP{C President – Moderator]

    Photo of winners from left to right:

    Lauren Davidson (VIC Medicare Local), Sue Thomson (SA Medicare Local), Jane
    Pappin (SA Healthfirst Solutions), Dr Leticia Gilmour (QLD disease
    prevention), Penelope Jones (VIC Spleen Service), Dr Nada Andric (WA Mobile
    GP Clinic).

    Kind Regards

    Marija Juraja

    RN, Grad Cert IC, CICP

    President, ACIPC

    Email College: admin@acipc.org.au

    Email Personal: marija.juraja@health.sa.gov.au

    WARNING : This email contains information, which is CONFIDENTIAL, and that
    maybe subject to LEGAL PRIVILEGE. This e-mail and any attachments to it (the
    “Communication”) is confidential and is for the use only of the intended
    recipient, and may not duplicated or used by any other party without the
    express consent of the sender. The Communication may contain copyright
    material of St Vincent’s Health & Aged Care(“SVHAC”), or any of its related
    entities or of third parties. If you are not the intended recipient of the
    Communication, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete
    the Communication, and do not read, copy, print, retransmit, store or act in
    reliance on the Communication. Any views expressed in the Communication are
    those of the individual sender only, unless expressly stated to be those of
    SVHAC. SVHAC does not guarantee the integrity of the Communication, or that
    it is free from errors, viruses or interference. Thank-you.

    _____

    Message protected by MailGuard: e-mail anti-virus, anti-spam and content
    filtering.
    http://www.mailguard.com.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO
    NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is
    discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products
    or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Glenys Harrington
    Participant

    Author:
    Glenys Harrington

    Email:
    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    Organisation:
    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    State:

    Hi Jennifer,

    Im not sure which linen cutes (new or old) you are referring to but here is
    what I know:

    The new state of the art linen (and waste) chutes based on vacuum technology
    look sound from an infection control perspective in that they often have the
    following features:

    *Air in the system is filtered before being discharged into the
    environment
    *Air and any odour in the system is prevented from entering the
    ward/department areas by:

    *airlock
    *the vacuum created in the pipe network is under negative pressure

    *The interlocking computer controls
    *Network of pipes that can be cleaned and sanitised
    *Separate transport pipe networks for waste and linen
    *At the terminal station/central collection area waste is collected
    into a fully enclosed compactor/container
    *The system can be modified to meet varying periods of hospital
    activity/demand

    Such systems have been installed in hospital in other countries and are
    supported by current guidelines (i.e. The USA 2010 edition of the FGI
    Guidelines for Design and Construction of Health Care Facilities)

    Here are some links with images and additional information:

    http://www.envacgroup.com/

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automated_Vacuum_Collection

    http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/5/prweb10701601.htm

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?vHgIs1dJ8QJI

    Historically waste and/or linen chutes in Australia hospitals have been were
    gravity systems. Since the late 90s such systems have not been recommended
    for the following reasons:

    a) Fire risks

    See links to the fire training videos used in hospital settings

    o Hospitals dont burn down!

    Made by film Australia in 1997 – based on a scenario where a patient
    disposes of a lighted cigarette down a laundry chute on the 8th floor of the
    hospital

    *http://www.youtube.com/watch?vYXaqN5pCl3Q

    o Hartford hospital fire 1961

    *Based on a true story where a patient disposes of a cigarette into a
    laundry/waste chute on the 8th floor of the hospital
    *http://keyeslifesafety.com/tag/hospital-fires/

    b) Occupational Health and Safety risks relating to:

    i.
    Lifting linen and waste bags

    ii.
    Exposure to blood or body fluids from leaking or split waste bags

    Where I previously worked gravity linen and waste chutes, which had been in
    place since 1975, were decommissioned in the late 90s due to Occupational
    Health and Safety issues including the following:

    *Linen bags were too heavy to lift into the linen chute inlet
    *Linen bags became stuck in the linen chute
    *Waste bags were splitting in the waste chute and on impact in the
    terminal collection container resulting in spillage of blood and/or body
    fluids
    *The waste chute was not able to be adequately cleaned following a
    spill in the chute

    Some Australian infection control and other healthcare personnel will be
    familiar with gravity chute systems (those working in the 70s, 80s &
    90s) however many may not be aware of automated waste and linen collection
    system which are based on vacuum technology.

    Australian Standards Handbook (HB) 260- 2003

    HB 260-2003 was first published in March 2003. As outlined in the forward of
    the handbook the aim was to provide information that would assist in the
    reduction of the risk of transmission of infectious diseases and multidrug
    resistant organisms.

    Since March 2003 there has not been a periodic review of the handbook or the
    release of new standards or amendments in the intervening years.

    The handbook states that chutes (linen and waste) can propel airborne
    contaminates throughout the facility and that chutes should not be
    incorporated in design features for the management or transfer of waste or
    linen in healthcare facilities.

    The comment and recommendations are not referenced and handbook only
    includes a bibliography.

    The comment in relation to propelling airborne contaminates throughout the
    facility may have come from the Healthcare Infection Control Practices
    Advisory Committee (HICPAC), Draft guidelines for environmental infection
    control in healthcare facilities, 2001 which is included in the
    bibliography.

    On review of the final version of these guidelines which was published in
    20041 it states the following in relation to laundry chutes:

    Contaminated textiles and fabrics in bags can be transported by cart or
    chute. Laundry chutes require proper design, maintenance, and use, because
    the piston-like action of a laundry bag traveling in the chute can propel
    airborne microbial contaminants throughout the facility. Laundry chutes
    should be maintained under negative air pressure to prevent the spread of
    microorganisms from floor to floor. Loose, contaminated pieces of laundry
    should not be tossed into chutes, and laundry bags should be closed or
    otherwise secured to prevent the contents from falling out into the chute.

    The main references for statement relating to airborne microbial
    contaminants2, 3 were published in 1964 and 1965.

    In the early 60s waste and linen collection system based on vacuum
    technology were in their initial stages of development and use. In addition
    the references also pre-date many hospital vacuum system instillations that
    have occurred in subsequent years.

    Given the date of HB260-2003 and the references in the CDC HICPAC 2004
    guidelines it is likely that such comments and recommendations relate to
    gravity chute systems not systems based on vacuum technology. Hence HB
    260-2003 may not be current.

    I have included the references below:

    Reference

    1.Sehulster LM, et al. Guidelines for environmental infection control
    in health-care facilities. Recommendations from the US department of Health
    and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the
    Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). Chicago
    IL; American Society for Healthcare Engineering/American Hospital
    Association; 2004)

    2.Hughes HG. Chutes in hospitals. Can Hosp 1964; 41:567

    3.Michaelsen GS. Designing linen chutes to reduce spread of infectious
    organisms. Hospitals JAHA 1965; 39 (3):1169).

    Regards

    Glenys

    Glenys Harrington

    Consultant

    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    PO Box 5202

    Middle Park

    Victoria, 3206

    Australia

    H: +61 3 96902216

    M: +61 404 816 434

    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    ABN 47533508426

    Of Cath Wade
    chutes in hospitals as infection control issue

    Chutes are not recommended as per Australian Standards HB 260-2003: Hospital
    Acquired Infections Engineering down the risks. Section 3.2 part (o)

    The CDC Guidelines for Environmental Infection Control in Health-Care
    Facilities also has information regarding laundry chutes.

    Both documents contain similar information regarding the spread of airborne
    contaminants from laundry chutes. Special design considerations must be
    taken into account if used e.g. negative pressure.

    There are also problems with cleaning it is very difficult to clean chute.

    Regards

    Cath Wade

    Director

    Healthcare & Infection Prevention

    Of Tozer, Jennifer (Health)
    control issue

    Can any of the ACIPC members please provide me with information around
    laundry chutes in the health care setting around issues from an infection
    control perspective . Also I would be very grateful if anyone could direct
    me towards literature around this topic of: laundry chutes and if they are
    deemed an infection control issue or not.

    Thank you for your assistance

    Jennifer K Tozer

    BArts Anthro,RN,MHN,IC cert

    Infection Prevention & Control Coordinator

    Central and Northern Adelaide Local Health Networks

    CALHN – MHS [Glenside Campus]

    NALHN – MHS [Oakden and James Nash House Campuses]

    Telephone (08) 7425 6237 Facsimile (08) 7425 6208 Mobile 0423 782
    171

    Infection Prevention and Control is Everybodys Business.

    email jennifer.tozer@health.sa.gov.au

    This email may contain confidential information, which may also be legally
    privileged. Only the intended recipient (s) may access, use, distribute or
    copy this email. If this email is received in error, please inform me by
    return email & delete the original.If there are doubts about the validity of
    this message please contact me by phone. It is the recipients responsibility
    to check the email and any attachments for viruses.

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO
    NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is
    discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products
    or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO
    NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is
    discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products
    or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Glenys Harrington
    Participant

    Author:
    Glenys Harrington

    Email:
    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    Organisation:
    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    State:

    Hi Irene,

    How complex an individual finds the NHSN definitions depends on; a) how
    often they are using them, b) how well they have been trained (including
    competency assessment) in the standardised application of the definitions
    and c) quality checks that need to be in place before reporting an
    infection.

    The aim of surveillance for surveillance purposes (i.e. not clinical
    management) is to standardise the application of the surveillance methods
    and definitions so we are comparing apples with apples either over time
    internally or externally

    (understanding the limitations of inter-hospital comparisons and
    benchmarking).

    In NHSN surveillance specific sites are assigned to organ space to further
    identify the location of the infection. This may not be of particular
    relevance to micro, ID, IC however, it will be of interest to
    surgeons/surgical registrars who for the purpose of internal audits/death
    audits, registries etc may classify infections to an anatomical location in
    addition to other criteria.

    Given the extensive use of the NHSN definitions worldwide we should leave
    any modifications/changes to CDC (who have the funds) and where we have
    concerns focus on training or retraining those collecting the surveillance
    data in the standardised application of the surveillance methods and
    definitions.

    This approach has worked well for infection control teams/infectious
    diseases staff who I have trained in NHSN surveillance methods/application
    of the definitions and was in a setting where the surveillance data was
    utilised for research studies.

    No surveillance method definitions will identify 100% of infections – the
    definitions will miss some infections and on occasions will over call some
    infections. As long as we are all doing the same thing (strict application
    of each definition) this should not be an issue in terms of why we are
    collecting the data timely feedback to relevant clinical and executive
    management staff and measuring and monitoring the impact of evidence based
    interventions that are implemented to improve patients outcomes.

    Regards

    Glenys

    Glenys Harrington

    Consultant

    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    PO Box 5202

    Middle Park

    Victoria, 3206

    Australia

    H: +61 3 96902216

    M: +61 404 816 434

    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    ABN 47533508426

    Of Wilkinson, Irene (Health)
    site infection definition for sternotomy infections

    Hi Glenys,

    Personally I believe the NHSN definitions are overly complex. I can
    understand the reason for distinguishing superficial infections from
    deep/organ space, but really what is the purpose of distinguishing deep from
    organ space? The likely causes/sources of infection and hence preventive
    measures would be similar.

    Regards,

    Irene

    Irene Wilkinson

    Manager, Infection Control Service

    SA Health

    Irene.wilkinson@health.sa.gov.au

    Of Glenys Harrington
    for sternotomy infections

    Hi John,

    While there is no muscle there is fascia and if involved you would proceed
    with using the deep definition to see if you meet the other criteria. From
    your description it seems in your cases you would meet b plus 1 signs of
    infection confirming it was a deep infection.

    The definition seems fairly straight forward to me and I have found it very
    easy to use over the years. It is a definition for surveillance purposes
    not clinical management.

    By definition an organ space infection does not include the wound, hence
    infection deep to the deep fascia a deep (or organ space infection) is
    not the correct application of the organ space definition.

    Vac dressings can be used on lots of wounds including superficial sternal
    wounds (see below). The foam is cut and contoured to fit the size of the
    tissue defect, and covered with an adhesive drape and connected through the
    evacuation tube to the vacuum pump. There is no exposure of the wound
    bed/surface using these devices.

    From memory there is usually an percutaneous suture in closure of a sternal
    wound.

    Bapat V et al. Experience with Vacuum-assisted closure
    of sternal wound infections following cardiac surgery and evaluation of
    chronic complications associated with its use.
    J Card Surg. 2008
    May-Jun;23(3):227-33Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St Thomas’
    Hospital, London, UK. vnbapat@yahoo.com

    Dezfuli B et al, Treatment of Sternal Wound Infection With Vacuum-assisted
    Closure. Wounds. 2013;25(2)

    Regards

    Glenys

    Glenys Harrington

    Consultant

    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    PO Box 5202

    Middle Park

    Victoria, 3206

    Australia

    H: +61 3 96902216

    M: +61 404 816 434

    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    ABN 47533508426

    Of John Ferguson
    site infection definition for sternotomy infections

    Thanks Glenys

    However, there is no muscle overlaying the sternum and the deep fascia is
    just above the periosteum of the sternum.

    For the most part there is just skin and subcut tissue in front of the
    sternum. These tissues overlying the sternum are very thin in most people.

    And so it is nonsensical to distinguish superficial from deep based on this
    definition in my view

    I don’t think that most surgeons put a closure layer beneath the skin once
    the sternum is wired- it is impossible. Effectively, then, opening or
    dehiscence of the incision will expose the fascia. Similarly, I cannot see
    that application of a vac can be done to a ‘superficial’ wound as the fascia
    will be exposed in these sort of wounds.

    I could cope if the definition specified in this case that infection deep to
    the deep fascia a deep (or organ space infection); however that is not
    what it says.

    We are long overdue for a better NHSN SSI definition., esp for sternal
    wounds

    John

    Dr John Ferguson

    Director, Infection Prevention & Control, Hunter New England Health
    Tel 61 2 4921 4444 | Fax 61 2 4921 4440 | Mob +61 428 885 573 |
    john.ferguson@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au | http://www.hicsiganz.org

    http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/images/communications/e-signatures/images/NSW-H
    ealth-Hunter-New-England-LHD.jpg

    Of Glenys Harrington
    for sternotomy infections

    Hi John,

    Whether or not these wounds are superficial or deep depends on the first
    part of the definition as to what tissue is involved. This question has to
    be answered before progressing to the rest of the definition.

    Superficial – Infection occurs within 30 days after any NHSN operative
    procedure and involves only skin and subcutaneous tissue of the incision

    Deep – Infection occurs within 30 or 90 days after the NHSN operative
    procedure and involves deep soft tissues of the incision (e.g., fascial and
    muscle layers)

    If only skin and subcutaneous tissue are involved it meets the superficial
    definition as from your description c below is met and, Im assuming that
    the patient had at least 1 of the sign or symptom below.

    patient has at least 1 of the following:

    a. purulent drainage from the superficial incision

    b. organsims isolated from an aseptically-obtained culture of fluid or
    tissue from the superficial incision

    c. superficial incision that is deliberately opened by a surgeon and is
    culture-positive or not cultured

    and

    patient has at least one of the following signs or symptoms of infection:
    pain or tenderness; localized swelling; redness; or heat. A culture negative
    finding does not meet this criterion

    d. diagnosis of superficial incisional SSI by the surgeon or attending
    physician

    If deep soft tissues (e.g., fascial and muscle layers) are involved it will
    meet the deep definition as from your description b below has been met and
    Im assuming that the patient has at least 1 of the sign or symptom below.

    patient has at least one of the following:

    a. purulent drainage from the deep incision

    b. a deep incision that spontaneously dehisces or is deliberately opened by
    a surgeon and is culture- positive or not cultured

    and

    patient has at least one of the following signs or symptoms: fever (>38C);
    localized pain or tenderness. A culture-negative finding does not meet this
    criterion.

    c. an abscess or other evidence of infection involving the deep incision is
    found on direct examination, during invasive procedure, or by
    histopathologic examination or imaging test.

    d. diagnosis of a deep incisional SSI by a surgeon or attending physician.

    Hence in the first instance you need to know what level the surgeon has
    opened these wounds too as VACs can be used on superficial or deep would
    infections.

    Just on organ space infections these wounds as described would not be
    considered an organ space infection as such infections exclude the skin
    incision, fascia, or muscle layers, that is opened or manipulated during the
    operative procedure (i.e. the incisional wound is not involved at all). In
    this surgical setting an organ space infection would be something like
    osteomyelitis of the sternum without surgical incision/wound involvement.

    I use a definition checklist (i.e. it either meets or does not meet the
    criteria) when training staff in the interpretation of the definitions for
    surveillance purposes.

    Can send a copy if you like.

    Regards

    Glenys

    Glenys Harrington

    Consultant

    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    PO Box 5202

    Middle Park

    Victoria, 3206

    Australia

    H: +61 3 96902216

    M: +61 404 816 434

    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    ABN 47533508426

    Of John Ferguson
    infection definition for sternotomy infections

    Dear All

    Would appreciate advice on interpretation of the definition (below)

    In two sternotomy cases, there has been prolonged ooze post op (several
    days) and the surgeon concerned has opened the wound on the ward and then
    instituted vac dressings

    The cases required prolonged nursing management but did not come to formal
    debridement or removal of sternal wires etc. CT scans did not show
    retrosternal collections (ie not organ space infection)

    In my view, this constitutes a ‘deep’ wound infection. What would others
    say?

    Our other surgeons would have usually taken such cases to theatre and
    performed open debridement

    in one case the culture grew Serratia

    in the other, culture was no growth; in that case, the determination rests
    then on whether we had ‘purulent drainage’ observed from the ‘deep incision’

    it does beg the question as to how one gauges from what level the drainage
    is coming fron and also whether one should use an objective measure for what
    is purulent etc!

    criterion b under superficial is also problematic – how does one ever get
    ‘aseptically-obtained’ samples from a superficial incision? wound swabs
    presumably not ok but I would guess are used

    Would be very interested to know of how people teach surveillance staff to
    apply the NHSN definition, esp for sternotomies , where essentially the
    superficial wound is extremely close to the deep sternal structure , and
    also for prosthetic joints where similar problems of distinguishing the
    depth of infection arise

    thanks

    John

    Dr John Ferguson
    Director, Infection Prevention & Control, Hunter New England Health

    Locked Bag 1, Newcastle Mail Centre, NSW 2310
    Tel 61 2 4921 4444 | Fax 61 2 4921 4440 | Mob +61 428 885 573 |
    john.ferguson@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au | http://www.hicsiganz.org

    http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/images/communications/e-signatures/images/NSW-H
    ealth-Hunter-New-England-LHD.jpg

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO
    NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is
    discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products
    or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO
    NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is
    discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products
    or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO
    NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is
    discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products
    or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO
    NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is
    discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products
    or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO
    NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is
    discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products
    or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Glenys Harrington
    Participant

    Author:
    Glenys Harrington

    Email:
    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    Organisation:
    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    State:

    Hi John,

    While there is no muscle there is fascia and if involved you would proceed
    with using the deep definition to see if you meet the other criteria. From
    your description it seems in your cases you would meet b plus 1 signs of
    infection confirming it was a deep infection.

    The definition seems fairly straight forward to me and I have found it very
    easy to use over the years. It is a definition for surveillance purposes
    not clinical management.

    By definition an organ space infection does not include the wound, hence
    infection deep to the deep fascia a deep (or organ space infection) is
    not the correct application of the organ space definition.

    Vac dressings can be used on lots of wounds including superficial sternal
    wounds (see below). The foam is cut and contoured to fit the size of the
    tissue defect, and covered with an adhesive drape and connected through the
    evacuation tube to the vacuum pump. There is no exposure of the wound
    bed/surface using these devices.

    From memory there is usually an percutaneous suture in closure of a sternal
    wound.

    Bapat V et al. Experience with Vacuum-assisted closure
    of sternal wound infections following cardiac surgery and evaluation of
    chronic complications associated with its use.
    J Card Surg. 2008
    May-Jun;23(3):227-33Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St Thomas’
    Hospital, London, UK. vnbapat@yahoo.com

    Dezfuli B et al, Treatment of Sternal Wound Infection With Vacuum-assisted
    Closure. Wounds. 2013;25(2)

    Regards

    Glenys

    Glenys Harrington

    Consultant

    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    PO Box 5202

    Middle Park

    Victoria, 3206

    Australia

    H: +61 3 96902216

    M: +61 404 816 434

    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    ABN 47533508426

    Of John Ferguson
    site infection definition for sternotomy infections

    Thanks Glenys

    However, there is no muscle overlaying the sternum and the deep fascia is
    just above the periosteum of the sternum.

    For the most part there is just skin and subcut tissue in front of the
    sternum. These tissues overlying the sternum are very thin in most people.

    And so it is nonsensical to distinguish superficial from deep based on this
    definition in my view

    I don’t think that most surgeons put a closure layer beneath the skin once
    the sternum is wired- it is impossible. Effectively, then, opening or
    dehiscence of the incision will expose the fascia. Similarly, I cannot see
    that application of a vac can be done to a ‘superficial’ wound as the fascia
    will be exposed in these sort of wounds.

    I could cope if the definition specified in this case that infection deep to
    the deep fascia a deep (or organ space infection); however that is not
    what it says.

    We are long overdue for a better NHSN SSI definition., esp for sternal
    wounds

    John

    Dr John Ferguson

    Director, Infection Prevention & Control, Hunter New England Health
    Tel 61 2 4921 4444 | Fax 61 2 4921 4440 | Mob +61 428 885 573 |
    john.ferguson@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au | http://www.hicsiganz.org

    http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/images/communications/e-signatures/images/NSW-H
    ealth-Hunter-New-England-LHD.jpg

    Of Glenys Harrington
    for sternotomy infections

    Hi John,

    Whether or not these wounds are superficial or deep depends on the first
    part of the definition as to what tissue is involved. This question has to
    be answered before progressing to the rest of the definition.

    Superficial – Infection occurs within 30 days after any NHSN operative
    procedure and involves only skin and subcutaneous tissue of the incision

    Deep – Infection occurs within 30 or 90 days after the NHSN operative
    procedure and involves deep soft tissues of the incision (e.g., fascial and
    muscle layers)

    If only skin and subcutaneous tissue are involved it meets the superficial
    definition as from your description c below is met and, Im assuming that
    the patient had at least 1 of the sign or symptom below.

    patient has at least 1 of the following:

    a. purulent drainage from the superficial incision

    b. organsims isolated from an aseptically-obtained culture of fluid or
    tissue from the superficial incision

    c. superficial incision that is deliberately opened by a surgeon and is
    culture-positive or not cultured

    and

    patient has at least one of the following signs or symptoms of infection:
    pain or tenderness; localized swelling; redness; or heat. A culture negative
    finding does not meet this criterion

    d. diagnosis of superficial incisional SSI by the surgeon or attending
    physician

    If deep soft tissues (e.g., fascial and muscle layers) are involved it will
    meet the deep definition as from your description b below has been met and
    Im assuming that the patient has at least 1 of the sign or symptom below.

    patient has at least one of the following:

    a. purulent drainage from the deep incision

    b. a deep incision that spontaneously dehisces or is deliberately opened by
    a surgeon and is culture- positive or not cultured

    and

    patient has at least one of the following signs or symptoms: fever (>38C);
    localized pain or tenderness. A culture-negative finding does not meet this
    criterion.

    c. an abscess or other evidence of infection involving the deep incision is
    found on direct examination, during invasive procedure, or by
    histopathologic examination or imaging test.

    d. diagnosis of a deep incisional SSI by a surgeon or attending physician.

    Hence in the first instance you need to know what level the surgeon has
    opened these wounds too as VACs can be used on superficial or deep would
    infections.

    Just on organ space infections these wounds as described would not be
    considered an organ space infection as such infections exclude the skin
    incision, fascia, or muscle layers, that is opened or manipulated during the
    operative procedure (i.e. the incisional wound is not involved at all). In
    this surgical setting an organ space infection would be something like
    osteomyelitis of the sternum without surgical incision/wound involvement.

    I use a definition checklist (i.e. it either meets or does not meet the
    criteria) when training staff in the interpretation of the definitions for
    surveillance purposes.

    Can send a copy if you like.

    Regards

    Glenys

    Glenys Harrington

    Consultant

    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    PO Box 5202

    Middle Park

    Victoria, 3206

    Australia

    H: +61 3 96902216

    M: +61 404 816 434

    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    ABN 47533508426

    Of John Ferguson
    infection definition for sternotomy infections

    Dear All

    Would appreciate advice on interpretation of the definition (below)

    In two sternotomy cases, there has been prolonged ooze post op (several
    days) and the surgeon concerned has opened the wound on the ward and then
    instituted vac dressings

    The cases required prolonged nursing management but did not come to formal
    debridement or removal of sternal wires etc. CT scans did not show
    retrosternal collections (ie not organ space infection)

    In my view, this constitutes a ‘deep’ wound infection. What would others
    say?

    Our other surgeons would have usually taken such cases to theatre and
    performed open debridement

    in one case the culture grew Serratia

    in the other, culture was no growth; in that case, the determination rests
    then on whether we had ‘purulent drainage’ observed from the ‘deep incision’

    it does beg the question as to how one gauges from what level the drainage
    is coming fron and also whether one should use an objective measure for what
    is purulent etc!

    criterion b under superficial is also problematic – how does one ever get
    ‘aseptically-obtained’ samples from a superficial incision? wound swabs
    presumably not ok but I would guess are used

    Would be very interested to know of how people teach surveillance staff to
    apply the NHSN definition, esp for sternotomies , where essentially the
    superficial wound is extremely close to the deep sternal structure , and
    also for prosthetic joints where similar problems of distinguishing the
    depth of infection arise

    thanks

    John

    Dr John Ferguson
    Director, Infection Prevention & Control, Hunter New England Health

    Locked Bag 1, Newcastle Mail Centre, NSW 2310
    Tel 61 2 4921 4444 | Fax 61 2 4921 4440 | Mob +61 428 885 573 |
    john.ferguson@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au | http://www.hicsiganz.org

    http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/images/communications/e-signatures/images/NSW-H
    ealth-Hunter-New-England-LHD.jpg

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO
    NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is
    discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products
    or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO
    NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is
    discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products
    or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO
    NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is
    discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products
    or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Glenys Harrington
    Participant

    Author:
    Glenys Harrington

    Email:
    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    Organisation:
    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    State:

    Hi John,

    Whether or not these wounds are superficial or deep depends on the first
    part of the definition as to what tissue is involved. This question has to
    be answered before progressing to the rest of the definition.

    Superficial – Infection occurs within 30 days after any NHSN operative
    procedure and involves only skin and subcutaneous tissue of the incision

    Deep – Infection occurs within 30 or 90 days after the NHSN operative
    procedure and involves deep soft tissues of the incision (e.g., fascial and
    muscle layers)

    If only skin and subcutaneous tissue are involved it meets the superficial
    definition as from your description c below is met and, Im assuming that
    the patient had at least 1 of the sign or symptom below.

    patient has at least 1 of the following:

    a. purulent drainage from the superficial incision

    b. organsims isolated from an aseptically-obtained culture of fluid or
    tissue from the superficial incision

    c. superficial incision that is deliberately opened by a surgeon and is
    culture-positive or not cultured

    and

    patient has at least one of the following signs or symptoms of infection:
    pain or tenderness; localized swelling; redness; or heat. A culture negative
    finding does not meet this criterion

    d. diagnosis of superficial incisional SSI by the surgeon or attending
    physician

    If deep soft tissues (e.g., fascial and muscle layers) are involved it will
    meet the deep definition as from your description b below has been met and
    Im assuming that the patient has at least 1 of the sign or symptom below.

    patient has at least one of the following:

    a. purulent drainage from the deep incision

    b. a deep incision that spontaneously dehisces or is deliberately opened by
    a surgeon and is culture- positive or not cultured

    and

    patient has at least one of the following signs or symptoms: fever (>38C);
    localized pain or tenderness. A culture-negative finding does not meet this
    criterion.

    c. an abscess or other evidence of infection involving the deep incision is
    found on direct examination, during invasive procedure, or by
    histopathologic examination or imaging test.

    d. diagnosis of a deep incisional SSI by a surgeon or attending physician.

    Hence in the first instance you need to know what level the surgeon has
    opened these wounds too as VACs can be used on superficial or deep would
    infections.

    Just on organ space infections these wounds as described would not be
    considered an organ space infection as such infections exclude the skin
    incision, fascia, or muscle layers, that is opened or manipulated during the
    operative procedure (i.e. the incisional wound is not involved at all). In
    this surgical setting an organ space infection would be something like
    osteomyelitis of the sternum without surgical incision/wound involvement.

    I use a definition checklist (i.e. it either meets or does not meet the
    criteria) when training staff in the interpretation of the definitions for
    surveillance purposes.

    Can send a copy if you like.

    Regards

    Glenys

    Glenys Harrington

    Consultant

    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    PO Box 5202

    Middle Park

    Victoria, 3206

    Australia

    H: +61 3 96902216

    M: +61 404 816 434

    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    ABN 47533508426

    Of John Ferguson
    infection definition for sternotomy infections

    Dear All

    Would appreciate advice on interpretation of the definition (below)

    In two sternotomy cases, there has been prolonged ooze post op (several
    days) and the surgeon concerned has opened the wound on the ward and then
    instituted vac dressings

    The cases required prolonged nursing management but did not come to formal
    debridement or removal of sternal wires etc. CT scans did not show
    retrosternal collections (ie not organ space infection)

    In my view, this constitutes a ‘deep’ wound infection. What would others
    say?

    Our other surgeons would have usually taken such cases to theatre and
    performed open debridement

    in one case the culture grew Serratia

    in the other, culture was no growth; in that case, the determination rests
    then on whether we had ‘purulent drainage’ observed from the ‘deep incision’

    it does beg the question as to how one gauges from what level the drainage
    is coming fron and also whether one should use an objective measure for what
    is purulent etc!

    criterion b under superficial is also problematic – how does one ever get
    ‘aseptically-obtained’ samples from a superficial incision? wound swabs
    presumably not ok but I would guess are used

    Would be very interested to know of how people teach surveillance staff to
    apply the NHSN definition, esp for sternotomies , where essentially the
    superficial wound is extremely close to the deep sternal structure , and
    also for prosthetic joints where similar problems of distinguishing the
    depth of infection arise

    thanks

    John

    Dr John Ferguson
    Director, Infection Prevention & Control, Hunter New England Health

    Locked Bag 1, Newcastle Mail Centre, NSW 2310
    Tel 61 2 4921 4444 | Fax 61 2 4921 4440 | Mob +61 428 885 573 |
    john.ferguson@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au | http://www.hicsiganz.org

    http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/images/communications/e-signatures/images/NSW-H
    ealth-Hunter-New-England-LHD.jpg

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO
    NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is
    discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products
    or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    in reply to: Anaesthetic staff eating in anaesthetic bays #70470
    Glenys Harrington
    Participant

    Author:
    Glenys Harrington

    Email:
    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    Organisation:
    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    State:

    Dear All,

    The risk seen obvious eating may result in hand contamination with mouth
    organisms. Combined with suboptimal hand hygiene and/or poor/inadequate
    aseptic technique this may lead to a device related infection or a pseudo
    infection.

    Im sure most patients would prefer not to end up with a Streptococcus mitis
    bloodstream infection or bacterial endocarditis as a result of staff eating
    in the OR.

    Regards

    Glenys

    Glenys Harrington

    Consultant

    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    PO Box 5202

    Middle Park

    Victoria, 3206

    Australia

    H: +61 3 96902216

    M: +61 404 816 434

    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    ABN 47533508426

    Of Michael Wishart
    anaesthetic bays

    Hi JoeAnne

    I have always battled to stop this in every hospital I have worked in
    (mostly private sector). The main argument is from those anaesthetists who
    are doing long cases in a list they claim they cannot take a break! My
    argument to them has always been: Do you want to explain to the patients
    (and the surgeon!) how they got a muffin [or insert any other food item
    here] granuloma in their surgical wound?!?! It is about ensuring we
    restrict items from within the operating room that are unnecessary.

    Trying to appeal to their risk from having to take their mask off to eat /
    drink doesnt work, as many do not even wear a mask!!!

    In my mind it is all about appropriate management of their work just like
    anyone else. If you can get executive buy-in to support you, you can at
    least require compliance, even if these anaesthetists dont believe they are
    putting the patients (or themselves) potentially at risk.

    Good luck.

    Cheers

    Michael

    Michael Wishart

    CNC Infection Control

    Holy Spirit Northside Private Hospital

    627 Rode Road, Chermside, Qld 4032

    t: (07) 3326 3068 | f: (07) 3607 2226

    e: Michael.Wishart@hsn.org.au

    w:
    http://www.holyspiritnorthside.org.au

    Please consider the environment before printing this email

    Of Joe-Anne Bendall

    Good morning

    We have been asked by Anaesthetists if they can eat and drink in the
    Anaesthetic Bays as this is what they do in private hospitals during
    long cases..I am not sure how accurate this information is.

    Does any hospital allow this practice to occur and what are the
    circumstances for this to occur?

    PS It does not occur at this hospital for a number of reasons:

    1. Infection control policy requirement

    2. Community expectations

    3. Workplace Health and Safety

    Thanks

    Joe-Anne Bendall

    Joe-anne Bendall | Clinical Nurse Consultant Infection Prevention and
    Control
    Sydney Hospital and Sydney Eye Hospital

    8 Macquarie St

    SYDNEY NSW 2000

    |( ph +61 2 9382 7199 |page 22070 via switch 9382 7111| 7 Fax 93827510 |

    Mobile 0418984255 | * Joe-anne.Bendall@SESIAHS.HEALTH.NSW.GOV.AU

    —————————————————————————-
    —————–
    Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, South East Sydney Local Health
    District and Sydney Children’s Hospital Network (Randwick Campus)
    Confidentiality Notice
    This email, and the files transmitted with it, are confidential and intended
    solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
    If you are not the intended recipient, you are not permitted to distribute
    or use this email or any of its attachments in any way. We also request that
    you advise the sender of the incorrect addressing.
    This email message has been virus-scanned. Although no computer viruses were
    detected, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, South East Sydney
    Local Health District and Sydney Children’s Hospital Network (Randwick
    Campus) accept no liability for any consequential damage resulting from
    email containing any computer viruses.
    We care for our environment. Please only print this e-mail if necessary.

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO
    NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is
    discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products
    or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    _____

    Message protected by MailGuard: e-mail anti-virus, anti-spam and content
    filtering.
    http://www.mailguard.com.au

    Report this message as spam

    WARNING : This email contains information, which is CONFIDENTIAL, and that
    maybe subject to LEGAL PRIVILEGE. This e-mail and any attachments to it (the
    “Communication”) is confidential and is for the use only of the intended
    recipient, and may not duplicated or used by any other party without the
    express consent of the sender. The Communication may contain copyright
    material of St Vincent’s Health & Aged Care(“SVHAC”), or any of its related
    entities or of third parties. If you are not the intended recipient of the
    Communication, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete
    the Communication, and do not read, copy, print, retransmit, store or act in
    reliance on the Communication. Any views expressed in the Communication are
    those of the individual sender only, unless expressly stated to be those of
    SVHAC. SVHAC does not guarantee the integrity of the Communication, or that
    it is free from errors, viruses or interference. Thank-you.

    _____

    Message protected by MailGuard: e-mail anti-virus, anti-spam and content
    filtering.
    http://www.mailguard.com.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO
    NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is
    discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products
    or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    in reply to: Re: ESBL’s – which ones? #70469
    Glenys Harrington
    Participant

    Author:
    Glenys Harrington

    Email:
    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    Organisation:
    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    State:

    Dear All,

    Further to below the following publication in ICHE discusses this question and may be of interest along with some of the references for this quote taken from the publication.

    “For example, in 2 similar prospective cohort studies conducted in the same ICU, cross transmission was found to be important for ESBL-producing K. pneumonia but not for Escherichia coli. Moreover, ESBL producing E. coli are endemic in the community in many countries, whereas this phenomenon is described less often for other species”

    The authors also make a very good point in that when assessing the need for contact precautions for multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae that you quantifying the clinical impact of HAIs caused by these organism and ascertain the proportion of newly colonized patients who develop infection.

    Publication Details:

    When Should Contact Precautions and Active Surveillance Be Used to Manage Patients with Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae?

    Author(s): Joshua T. Freeman, MBChB, FRCPA; Deborah A. Williamson, MBChB, MRCP; Deverick J. Anderson, MD, MPH

    Regards

    Glenys

    Glenys Harrington
    Consultant
    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    PO Box 5202
    Middle Park
    Victoria, 3206
    Australia
    H: +61 3 96902216
    M: +61 404 816 434
    infexion@ozemail.com.au
    ABN 47533508426

    —–Original Message—–

    Hi Micheal
    We risk assess all patient’s with an ESBL. We are less likely to isolate a e-coli ESBL compared to a Klebsiella ESBL. Also I depends on the patient group being cohorted or allocated within. In lower risk environments such as aged care where we have no evidence of cross infection we do not isolate unless the patient has a urinary catheter in situ.
    I think using a risk assessment approach is important as it’s impossible to isolate all patient colonised Giulietta Pontivivo| Nurse Manager/CNC| Infection Prevention Management & Staff Health Services| St Vincent’s Health Network | 390 Victoria Street Darlinghurst | NSW 2010
    T: 61 2 83823284| F: 61 2 8382 3892| M: 0457 533 452 | E: gpontivivo@stvincents.com.au

    with an MRO.
    Regards Giulietta

    —–Original Message—–

    Hi all

    Just thought I’d bump this question again, as I didn’t get any responses. Surely someone has an opinion on which gram-negatives need to be managed as MROs?

    Thanks
    Michael

    Michael Wishart
    CNC Infection Control
    Holy Spirit Northside Private Hospital
    627 Rode Road, Chermside, Qld 4032
    t: (07) 3326 3068 | f: (07) 3607 2226
    e: Michael.Wishart@hsn.org.au
    w:www.holyspiritnorthside.org.au
    Please consider the environment before printing this email

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    **********************************************************************
    This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.

    This footnote also confirms that this email message has been virus scanned and although no viruses were detected by the system, St Vincents & Mater Health Sydney accepts no liability for any consequential damage resulting from email containing any computer viruses.

    **********************************************************************

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Glenys Harrington
    Participant

    Author:
    Glenys Harrington

    Email:
    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    Organisation:
    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    State:

    Hi John,

    See link to the Victorian DOH “Guidelines for the classification and design
    of isolation rooms in health care facilities”

    http://www.health.vic.gov.au/infectionprevention/publications/design_isolati
    on_rooms.htm

    Full PDF at the bottom of the page

    As Kevin mentioned in his response dual purpose room are not recommended –
    see 2.4 Class A-Alternating pressure (negative/positive pressure) on page 7

    “Rooms with reversible airflow mechanisms enabling the room to be either
    negative or positive pressure are not recommended.(7) Problems with such
    rooms include the difficulty of configuring appropriate airflow for two
    fundamentally different purposes (see section 5.4), the risk of operator
    error, complex engineering and fail safe mechanisms”

    Regards

    Glenys

    Glenys Harrington

    Consultant

    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    PO Box 5202

    Middle Park

    Victoria, 3206

    Australia

    H: +61 3 96902216

    M: +61 404 816 434

    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    ABN 47533508426

    Of John Ferguson
    precaution (pos pressure) room design

    Dear Brainstrust

    Some time ago, I came across a novel configuration of a single room that
    provides for both protective (positive pressure barrier) and isolation
    (negative pressure) requirements. Extensive testing was described at the
    Hospital Infection Society Conference, Amsterdam 2006. It was specified
    under Building Note 4 by
    HEFMA but the link no longer works and I’ve been unsuccessful with chasing
    down the design. Concept involves an isolation room with a positive pressure
    anteroom and exhaust from the ensuite room which is entered from the main
    room. The design is relatively fail-safe and does not need to be manually
    configured.

    I wondered whether anyone has come across this? Has anyone built functioning
    dual purpose isolation/barrier rooms? We are building a new paed ICU and we
    need both types of room !

    thanks

    John

    http://hicsigwiki.asid.net.au/index.php?title=Built_Environment

    Dr John Ferguson
    Director, Infection Prevention & Control, Hunter New England Health

    Infectious Diseases Physician, Division of Medicine, John Hunter Hospital

    Clinical Microbiologist, Hunter Area Pathology, Pathology North

    Conjoint Associate Professor, University of Newcastle, Adjunct Professor,
    University of New England

    Locked Bag 1, Newcastle Mail Centre, NSW 2310
    Tel 61 2 4921 4444 | Fax 61 2 4921 4440 | Mob +61 428 885 573 |
    john.ferguson@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au | http://www.hicsiganz.org

    http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/images/communications/e-signatures/images/NSW-H
    ealth-Hunter-New-England-LHD.jpg

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO
    NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is
    discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products
    or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Glenys Harrington
    Participant

    Author:
    Glenys Harrington

    Email:
    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    Organisation:
    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    State:

    Dear All,

    Many thanks to all those members who sent me a hard copy to this document
    and the QLD document/link relating to the above matters.

    Your collegiality and assistance very much appreciated.

    regards

    Glenys

    Glenys Harrington

    Consultant

    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    PO Box 5202

    Middle Park

    Victoria, 3206

    Australia

    H: +61 3 96902216

    M: +61 404 816 434

    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    ABN 47533508426

    Of Glenys Harrington
    Guidelines for Storage and Handling of Pre-Sterilized Consumables

    Dear All,

    Can anyone from NSW assist me with locating the following document which is
    listed as a resources in B1.5.8 in the Australian Guidelines for the
    Prevention and Control of Infection in Healthcare (2010).

    . NSW Health, Health Procurement, Guidelines for Storage and
    Handling of Pre-Sterilized Consumables

    Many thanks in anticipation

    Glenys

    Glenys Harrington

    Consultant

    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    PO Box 5202

    Middle Park

    Victoria, 3206

    Australia

    H: +61 3 96902216

    M: +61 404 816 434

    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    ABN 47533508426

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do
    not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.

    The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    in reply to: Mechanical Hand dryers at clinical staff sinks #70086
    Glenys Harrington
    Participant

    Author:
    Glenys Harrington

    Email:
    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    Organisation:
    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    State:

    Hi Lyn,

    My understanding is that they are too noisy for clinical areas particularly
    at night.

    Regards

    Glenys

    Glenys Harrington

    Consultant

    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    PO Box 5202

    Middle Park

    Victoria, 3206

    Australia

    H: +61 3 96902216

    M: +61 404 816 434

    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    ABN 47533508426

    Of Lyn A. Golden
    sinks

    Has anybody had any experience with installation of hand dryers (warm
    blowing air) in clinical areas?
    We are building a new facility, the question has been raised can we install
    hand dryers instead of paper towel in clinical areas at the hand washing
    sinks?

    Does anyone have any thoughts on this?

    Lyn

    Infection Prevention and Control Manager

    Echuca Regional Health
    17 Francis Street
    Echuca 3564

    Helping Everyone To Be And Stay Healthy

    not disclose or use the information in this e-mail if you are not the
    intended recipient. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify
    us immediately and delete the e-mail and all copies. Echuca Regional Health
    does not guarantee that this e-mail is virus or error free. The attached
    files are provided and may only be used on the basis that the user assumes
    all responsibility for any loss, damage or consequence resulting directly or
    indirectly from the use of the attached files, whether caused by the
    negligence of the sender or not. The content and opinions in this e-mail are
    not necessarily those of Echuca Regional Health.

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do
    not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    in reply to: Isolating VRE Patients #69777
    Glenys Harrington
    Participant

    Author:
    Glenys Harrington

    Email:
    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    Organisation:
    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    State:

    Hi Michael,

    I’m interested to know how you manage the clearance regime to get the weekly
    rectal swabs over a three week period for all your VRE positive patients
    over time.

    Do you have a computer tracking and readmission and flagging system or is
    this tracking done manually?

    What if the VRE patient goes home before the 3 weeks is up? I’m guessing
    that with the exception of your dialysis patients the average length of stay
    of most inpatients is probably only 4-5 days so do you follow up pts after
    discharge to complete the clearance regime?

    Would be interested to hear from other infection control teams with similar
    clearance regimes and those who also have a large accumulated numbers of
    VRE positive patients as to how tracking and readmission
    flagging/identification occurs.

    Regards

    Glenys

    Glenys Harrington

    Consultant

    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    PO Box 5202

    Middle Park

    Victoria, 3206

    Australia

    M: +61 404 816 434

    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    ABN 47533508426

    Of Michael Wishart

    Hi Barbara

    In my lovely hospital here we have 80+% single rooms (including 2 in our 15
    bed ICU), so isolation of inpatients with VRE is not a problem, and we
    isolate all patients with a history of VRE. We do have a ‘clearance’ regime
    that involves 3 negative rectal swabs (plus any other infected / colonised
    sites) at least 3 months after last positive, on no antibiotic therapy for
    at least 2 weeks, and the clearance swabs must be at least a week apart.

    Having said all that, in hospitals with limited single rooms I have seen all
    sorts of algorithms for isolation of VRE. Some of the thoughts in these
    include risk of transmission (high risk patients: those with diarrhoea or
    symptomatic infection; high risk areas like dialysis / transplant / oncology
    / ICU) and time since last positive.

    There was actually a discussion a while ago (?Ozbug, ?HICSIG) about the
    whole value of VRE precaution, since the actual morbidity with VRE infection
    is low (even though colonisation rates may be increasing), so there are
    varied opinions on this.

    Cheers

    Michael

    Michael Wishart

    CNC Infection Control

    Holy Spirit Northside Private Hospital

    627 Rode Road, Chermside, Qld 4032

    t: (07) 3326 3068 | f: (07) 3607 2226

    e: Michael.Wishart@hsn.org.au

    w:
    http://www.holyspiritnorthside.org.au

    Please consider the environment before printing this email

    Of May, Barbara

    Hello,

    My managers have asked me to review our current practices of isolating VRE
    positive patients. This is mainly due to the limited number of single rooms
    within our facility. I am interested to know how you manage patients who
    have a positive VRE screen, whether you isolate or not, what risk
    assessments you undertake to determine as to whether to isolate or not and
    whether you have introduced a yoghurt regime for these patients and how you
    then manage these patients.

    Thanking you in advance,

    Barbara

    Barbara May

    CNC Infection Control

    Hastings Macleay Clinical Network

    Ph. 0255242061

    Mo. 0402890677

    This message is intended for the addressee(s) named and may contain
    confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
    delete the message and any attachments and notify the sender. Views
    expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not
    necessarily the views of NSW Health or any of its entities.

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do
    not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Message protected by MailGuard: e-mail anti-virus, anti-spam and content
    filtering.
    http://www.mailguard.com.au/mg

    Report this message as spam

    WARNING : This email contains information, which is CONFIDENTIAL, and that
    maybe subject to LEGAL PRIVILEGE. This e-mail and any attachments to it (the
    “Communication”) is confidential and is for the use only of the intended
    recipient, and may not duplicated or used by any other party without the
    express consent of the sender. The Communication may contain copyright
    material of St Vincent’s Health & Aged Care(“SVHAC”), or any of its related
    entities or of third parties. If you are not the intended recipient of the
    Communication, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete
    the Communication, and do not read, copy, print, retransmit, store or act in
    reliance on the Communication. Any views expressed in the Communication are
    those of the individual sender only, unless expressly stated to be those of
    SVHAC. SVHAC does not guarantee the integrity of the Communication, or that
    it is free from errors, viruses or interference. Thank-you.

    Message protected by MailGuard: e-mail anti-virus, anti-spam and content
    filtering.
    http://www.mailguard.com.au/mg

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do
    not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    in reply to: Re: Electronic Sensor Taps #69770
    Glenys Harrington
    Participant

    Author:
    Glenys Harrington

    Email:
    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    Organisation:
    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    State:

    Hi Sue,

    My experience with these types of taps:

    a) impatient staff noted to contaminate their hands by touching the sensor
    repeatedly during hand washing

    b) temperature cannot be modified (% cold/warm)

    c) hospital engineers did not like them as they had higher maintenance
    requirements than elbow taps

    regards

    Glenys

    Glenys Harrington
    Consultant
    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    PO Box 5202
    Middle Park
    Victoria, 3206
    Australia
    H: +61 3 96902216
    M: +61 404 816 434
    infexion@ozemail.com.au
    ABN 47533508426

    —–Original Message—–
    Of Lee, Rosie

    Hello

    We also had them in our ICU in 2002 (installed without real consultation
    with IC) and have had issues with it. An outbreak of MRPA in our ICU
    identified the source to be these taps following literature search
    indicating the issues as outlined by Sue. This was confirmed by typing.
    We did not publish but presented this at the National Conference. We have
    had to implement monthly thermal heating & disinfection since.
    I don’t support these taps unless there are newer better products which
    addresses the issues and you have a good maintenance program in place.
    However as already mentioned, this is costly and not monitored effectively.

    Regards
    Rosie
    Rosie Lee
    RN. BSc. CICP
    Coordinator – Infection Prevention & Management
    SMH Service – Royal Perth Hospital

    Ph + 61 8 9224 2805 Fax + 61 8 9224 1989
    IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email (including any attachments) may
    be privileged and confidential. Any unauthorised use of its contents is
    expressly prohibited.
    If you received this email in error, please advise me by reply email or
    telephone —–Original Message—–
    Of Tim Spencer

    Sue,
    We had them in our old ICU before moving into our bigger, new facility.
    They failed regularly and were a major inconvenience when not working.
    Seriously, consider the normal long handled (elbow-control) taps and
    handles.
    Power failures are also problematic.
    T..

    Regards, Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APN, DipAppSci, Bach.Health, ICCert.
    Clinical Nurse Consultant | Central Venous Access & Parenteral Nutrition
    Service Conjoint Lecturer, University of NSW Dept of Intensive Care, Level
    2, Clinical Building, Liverpool Hospital, Elizabeth Street, Liverpool, 2170,
    NSW, Australia Tel 02 8738 3603 | Fax 02 8738 3551 | Mob +61(0)409 463 428 |
    Tim.Spencer@sswahs.nsw.gov.au | Timothy.Spencer@unsw.edu.au

    ________________________________

    Dear All

    Here at the Royal Hobart Hospital we are in the detailed design stage of our
    major redevelopment project, and we are currently investigating the pros and
    cons of the electronic sensor taps for our clinical hand basins. I have
    undertaken a literature search and it appears that some facilities that have
    installed the newer sensor taps, as an infection prevention and control
    improvement activity, are now removing them and returning to the more
    traditional elbow taps.

    The literature suggests that the complexity of the internal workings of the
    electronic tap and the lower dynamic water flow, could contribute to the
    higher level of legionella and other waterborne bacteria found by some
    studies.

    I am very interested to hear from facilities within Australia, regarding
    what type of tap ware has been installed within newly refurbished areas or
    new construction projects.

    Kind Regards

    Sue Draycott

    Infection Control Manager

    Redevelopment RHH and CCC Services

    Southern Tasmania Area Health Service

    Level 9, A Block, Royal Hobart Hospital

    Liverpool Street

    Hobart, 7000

    ________________________________

    CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
    The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected by
    legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or persons
    to whom it is addressed. If you are not such a person, you are warned that
    any disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised.
    If you have received the transmission in error, please immediately contact
    this office by telephone, fax or email, to inform us of the error and to
    enable arrangements to be made for the destruction of the transmission, or
    its return at our cost. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of
    the information contained in this transmission.

    _____________________________________________________________________
    This email has been scanned for the Sydney & South Western Sydney Local
    Health Districts by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
    Sydney & South Western Sydney Local Health Districts regularly monitor email
    and attachments to ensure compliance with the NSW Ministry of Health’s
    Electronic Messaging Policy.
    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do
    not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’
    (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    _____________________________________________________________________
    This email has been scanned for the Sydney & South Western Sydney Local
    Health Districts by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
    Sydney & South Western Sydney Local Health Districts regularly monitor email
    and attachments to ensure compliance with the NSW Ministry of Health’s
    Electronic Messaging Policy.

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do
    not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’
    (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do
    not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Glenys Harrington
    Participant

    Author:
    Glenys Harrington

    Email:
    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    Organisation:
    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    State:

    Hi So,

    I’m not familiar with the system at the link you provided.

    You will need to evaluated each system individually in terms of their
    advantages and disadvantages.

    The manufacturer or supplier should be able to provide you with information
    in relation to any infection control concerns you may have in relation to
    disposal of linen or waste via a chute system.

    Regards

    Glenys

    Glenys Harrington

    Consultant

    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    PO Box 5202

    Middle Park

    Victoria, 3206

    Australia

    H: +61 3 96902216

    M: +61 404 816 434

    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    ABN 47533508426

    Of Sony SO
    &/or waste chute

    Dear Glenys & Michael,

    Thank for your information.

    Because we are preparing for hospital renovation, hence we would like to
    keep abreast of updated international infection control requirements, with a
    view to further reducing infection control hazards caused by transportation
    of waste & contaminated linen. My further questions are as follows:

    If linen chute &/or waste chute are used, what are the recommended infection
    control measures; & whether we would transport clinical waste or infected
    linen via respective chutes.

    At present, we noted another transportation system for used linen, for
    details, please visit MIH system website http://www.mhisystems.com
    . The aforesaid system seems
    not only reduce infectious risk, but risk of manual handling operation is
    also addressed.

    Regards,

    Sony SO

    Nursing Officer, Infection Control Team

    Kwong Wah Hospital

    HONG KONG SAR,CHINA

    Tel:+ 852 3517-2409 Fax: +852 2332-3348 email:sony@ha.org.hk

    Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

    Of Glenys Harrington

    Hi Sony and Michael,

    The only Australian reference to linen and waste chutes is the “2003
    Handbook – Hospital acquired infections – Engineering down the risks” which
    states the following:

    . 3.2(a) Disposal rooms para 2 – “Chutes require particular design
    features and will raise ongoing maintenance and cleaning issues. In
    addition, chutes can propel airborne contaminants throughout the facility.
    Therefore, chutes should not be incorporated in design features for the
    management of transport of waste or linen in healthcare facilities”

    These standards may be somewhat out of date (i.e. 2003) as new generation
    waste and linen chute systems have been introduced into Europe, Asia and the
    US for use in residential, industrial, commercial and hospital and nursing
    home settings.

    In the US the “2010 edition of the FGI “Guidelines for Design and
    Construction of Health Care Facilities”, refuse and linen chutes are
    permitted and the guideline and states the following:

    Refuse chutes

    2.1.4 Patient Support Services

    2.1-5 General Support Services and Facilities

    2.1 – 5.4 Waste Management Facilities

    2.1 0 5.4.1.4 Refuse chutes, If provided, these shall meet or exceed the
    following standards:

    (1) Chutes shall meet the provisions described in NFPA 82

    (2) Service openings to chutes shall comply with NFPA 101

    (3) Chute discharge into collection rooms shall comply with NFPA 101

    (4) The minimum cross-sectional dimension of gravity chutes shall be 2 feet
    (60.96 centimetres)

    Linen chutes

    2.2-5.2.6 – if provided shall meet or exceed the following standards:

    2.5 -5.2.6.1 Standards

    (1) Service openings to chutes shall comply with NFPA 101

    (2) Chutes shall meet the provision described in NFPA 82

    (3) Chute discharge into collection rooms shall comply with NFPA 101

    2.2-5.2.6.2 Dimensions. The minimum cross-sectional dimensions of gravity
    chutes shall be 2 feet

    (60.96 centimetres)

    The NFPA is the US “National Fire Protection Association”

    In addition the USA DRAFT – 2014 edition of the FGI “Guidelines for Design
    and Construction of Health Care Facilities” includes guidelines for such
    chutes.

    The draft 2014 manuscript is available for public comment can be accessed at
    the following link: http://www.fgiguidelines.net/comments/draft.php

    Regards

    Glenys

    Glenys Harrington

    Consultant

    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    PO Box 5202

    Middle Park

    Victoria, 3206

    Australia

    H: +61 3 96902216

    M: +61 404 816 434

    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    ABN 47533508426

    Of Michael Wishart
    &/or waste chute

    Hi Sony

    My understanding is that in Australia, most new hospital buildings, and
    indeed those being refurbished, have removed linen and waste chutes due to
    fire regulations prohibiting them. So I would not think there are many
    hospitals with these kinds of chutes left in this country.

    Cheers
    Michael Wishart

    Michael Wishart

    CNC Infection Control

    Holy Spirit Northside Private Hospital

    627 Rode Road, Chermside, Qld 4032

    t: (07) 3326 3068 | f: (07) 3326 3523

    e: Michael.Wishart@hsn.org.au

    w:
    http://www.holyspiritnorthside.org.au

    Please consider the environment before printing this email

    _____

    SO [sony@HA.ORG.HK]

    Dear All,

    We are preparing our hospital renovation project, hence we would like to
    know whether you would use linen chute &/or waste chute.

    Your sharing would be a tremendous help.

    Regards,

    Sony SO

    Nursing Officer, Infection Control Team

    Kwong Wah Hospital

    HONG KONG SAR, CHINA

    Tel:+ 852 3517-2409 Fax: +852 2332-3348 email:sony@ha.org.hk

    Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

    _____

    ***************************************************************************
    Disclaimer

    This Email may contain privileged and confidential information and is solely
    for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended
    recipient, you must not print, copy, distribute or take any action in
    reliance on it. If you have received this Email by mistake, please notify
    the sender and then delete this Email from your computer. The Hospital
    Authority does not accept liability arising from Email transmitted by
    mistake.

    Although this Email and any attachments are believed to be free of virus or
    other defects that might affect any computer system into which it is
    received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure
    that it is virus free, and no responsibility is accepted by the Hospital
    Authority for any loss or damage in any way arising from its use.

    All views or opinions expressed in this Email and its attachments are those
    of the sender and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the
    Hospital Authority.
    ***************************************************************************
    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do
    not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Message protected by MailGuard: e-mail anti-virus, anti-spam and content
    filtering.
    http://www.mailguard.com.au/mg

    Report this message as spam

    WARNING : This email contains information, which is CONFIDENTIAL, and that
    maybe subject to LEGAL PRIVILEGE. This e-mail and any attachments to it (the
    “Communication”) is confidential and is for the use only of the intended
    recipient, and may not duplicated or used by any other party without the
    express consent of the sender. The Communication may contain copyright
    material of St Vincent’s Health & Aged Care(“SVHAC”), or any of its related
    entities or of third parties. If you are not the intended recipient of the
    Communication, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete
    the Communication, and do not read, copy, print, retransmit, store or act in
    reliance on the Communication. Any views expressed in the Communication are
    those of the individual sender only, unless expressly stated to be those of
    SVHAC. SVHAC does not guarantee the integrity of the Communication, or that
    it is free from errors, viruses or interference. Thank-you.

    Message protected by MailGuard: e-mail anti-virus, anti-spam and content
    filtering.
    http://www.mailguard.com.au/mg

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do
    not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do
    not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    _____

    ***************************************************************************
    Disclaimer

    This Email may contain privileged and confidential information and is solely
    for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended
    recipient, you must not print, copy, distribute or take any action in
    reliance on it. If you have received this Email by mistake, please notify
    the sender and then delete this Email from your computer. The Hospital
    Authority does not accept liability arising from Email transmitted by
    mistake.

    Although this Email and any attachments are believed to be free of virus or
    other defects that might affect any computer system into which it is
    received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure
    that it is virus free, and no responsibility is accepted by the Hospital
    Authority for any loss or damage in any way arising from its use.

    All views or opinions expressed in this Email and its attachments are those
    of the sender and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the
    Hospital Authority.
    ***************************************************************************

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do
    not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    in reply to: whether you would use linen chute &/or waste chute #69683
    Glenys Harrington
    Participant

    Author:
    Glenys Harrington

    Email:
    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    Organisation:
    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    State:

    Hi Sony and Michael,

    The only Australian reference to linen and waste chutes is the “2003
    Handbook – Hospital acquired infections – Engineering down the risks” which
    states the following:

    . 3.2(a) Disposal rooms para 2 – “Chutes require particular design
    features and will raise ongoing maintenance and cleaning issues. In
    addition, chutes can propel airborne contaminants throughout the facility.
    Therefore, chutes should not be incorporated in design features for the
    management of transport of waste or linen in healthcare facilities”

    These standards may be somewhat out of date (i.e. 2003) as new generation
    waste and linen chute systems have been introduced into Europe, Asia and the
    US for use in residential, industrial, commercial and hospital and nursing
    home settings.

    In the US the “2010 edition of the FGI “Guidelines for Design and
    Construction of Health Care Facilities”, refuse and linen chutes are
    permitted and the guideline and states the following:

    Refuse chutes

    2.1.4 Patient Support Services

    2.1-5 General Support Services and Facilities

    2.1 – 5.4 Waste Management Facilities

    2.1 0 5.4.1.4 Refuse chutes, If provided, these shall meet or exceed the
    following standards:

    (1) Chutes shall meet the provisions described in NFPA 82

    (2) Service openings to chutes shall comply with NFPA 101

    (3) Chute discharge into collection rooms shall comply with NFPA 101

    (4) The minimum cross-sectional dimension of gravity chutes shall be 2 feet
    (60.96 centimetres)

    Linen chutes

    2.2-5.2.6 – if provided shall meet or exceed the following standards:

    2.5 -5.2.6.1 Standards

    (1) Service openings to chutes shall comply with NFPA 101

    (2) Chutes shall meet the provision described in NFPA 82

    (3) Chute discharge into collection rooms shall comply with NFPA 101

    2.2-5.2.6.2 Dimensions. The minimum cross-sectional dimensions of gravity
    chutes shall be 2 feet

    (60.96 centimetres)

    The NFPA is the US “National Fire Protection Association”

    In addition the USA DRAFT – 2014 edition of the FGI “Guidelines for Design
    and Construction of Health Care Facilities” includes guidelines for such
    chutes.

    The draft 2014 manuscript is available for public comment can be accessed at
    the following link: http://www.fgiguidelines.net/comments/draft.php

    Regards

    Glenys

    Glenys Harrington

    Consultant

    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    PO Box 5202

    Middle Park

    Victoria, 3206

    Australia

    H: +61 3 96902216

    M: +61 404 816 434

    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    ABN 47533508426

    Of Michael Wishart
    &/or waste chute

    Hi Sony

    My understanding is that in Australia, most new hospital buildings, and
    indeed those being refurbished, have removed linen and waste chutes due to
    fire regulations prohibiting them. So I would not think there are many
    hospitals with these kinds of chutes left in this country.

    Cheers
    Michael Wishart

    Michael Wishart

    CNC Infection Control

    Holy Spirit Northside Private Hospital

    627 Rode Road, Chermside, Qld 4032

    t: (07) 3326 3068 | f: (07) 3326 3523

    e: Michael.Wishart@hsn.org.au

    w:
    http://www.holyspiritnorthside.org.au

    Please consider the environment before printing this email

    _____

    SO [sony@HA.ORG.HK]

    Dear All,

    We are preparing our hospital renovation project, hence we would like to
    know whether you would use linen chute &/or waste chute.

    Your sharing would be a tremendous help.

    Regards,

    Sony SO

    Nursing Officer, Infection Control Team

    Kwong Wah Hospital

    HONG KONG SAR, CHINA

    Tel:+ 852 3517-2409 Fax: +852 2332-3348 email:sony@ha.org.hk

    Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

    _____

    ***************************************************************************
    Disclaimer

    This Email may contain privileged and confidential information and is solely
    for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended
    recipient, you must not print, copy, distribute or take any action in
    reliance on it. If you have received this Email by mistake, please notify
    the sender and then delete this Email from your computer. The Hospital
    Authority does not accept liability arising from Email transmitted by
    mistake.

    Although this Email and any attachments are believed to be free of virus or
    other defects that might affect any computer system into which it is
    received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure
    that it is virus free, and no responsibility is accepted by the Hospital
    Authority for any loss or damage in any way arising from its use.

    All views or opinions expressed in this Email and its attachments are those
    of the sender and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the
    Hospital Authority.
    ***************************************************************************
    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do
    not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Message protected by MailGuard: e-mail anti-virus, anti-spam and content
    filtering.
    http://www.mailguard.com.au/mg

    Report this message as spam

    WARNING : This email contains information, which is CONFIDENTIAL, and that
    maybe subject to LEGAL PRIVILEGE. This e-mail and any attachments to it (the
    “Communication”) is confidential and is for the use only of the intended
    recipient, and may not duplicated or used by any other party without the
    express consent of the sender. The Communication may contain copyright
    material of St Vincent’s Health & Aged Care(“SVHAC”), or any of its related
    entities or of third parties. If you are not the intended recipient of the
    Communication, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete
    the Communication, and do not read, copy, print, retransmit, store or act in
    reliance on the Communication. Any views expressed in the Communication are
    those of the individual sender only, unless expressly stated to be those of
    SVHAC. SVHAC does not guarantee the integrity of the Communication, or that
    it is free from errors, viruses or interference. Thank-you.

    Message protected by MailGuard: e-mail anti-virus, anti-spam and content
    filtering.
    http://www.mailguard.com.au/mg

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do
    not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    in reply to: Re: Hand sanitiser – Food Services #69661
    Glenys Harrington
    Participant

    Author:
    Glenys Harrington

    Email:
    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    Organisation:
    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    State:

    Hi Michael and members,

    While I appreciate the workload issues of the moderator/administrator of the
    infexion connection I agree with Cath in that the use of brand names in the
    absence of a FDA/TGA/manufacturer alert/recall is inappropriate and
    depending on the discussion may also be litigious.

    Regards

    Glenys

    Glenys Harrington

    Consultant

    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)

    PO Box 5202

    Middle Park

    Victoria, 3206

    Australia

    M: +61 404 816 434

    infexion@ozemail.com.au

    ABN 47533508426

    Of Michael Wishart

    Hi Cath

    Food safety recommendations preclude use of non-food safe chemicals in the
    food processing environment, which precludes use of most alcohol based hand
    hygiene products and some antiseptic products. I do believe there are some
    waterless hand hygiene products (not sure if some of these should be
    considered ‘alcohol’ based, though) that are approved as ‘food safe’, but
    most of those alcohol based hand hygiene products routinely in use in
    healthcare have not been approved as ‘food safe’. Thus, the use of alcohol
    based hand hygiene products within certain parts of food services with
    healthcare facilities is problematic, which is why I think this is a good
    question, and I believe the responses have indicated this.

    In regard to mentioning of brand names, yes, we generally try to recommend
    avoiding use of brand names in discussions where possible, but this creates
    some work for both myself as the moderator and the list subscribers who are
    replying. Rather than bog the list down in administrative emails and such, I
    have preferred to weigh up the issue of posting of actual product names with
    the benefits of open discussion. For example, in this instance, my belief
    was it was useful to see which actual products are being used in what
    aspects of food service delivery (eg ward delivery vs food production), as
    this was conducive to the conversation. This approach had been supported by
    previous ACIPC / AICA executives, although like all things, this is open to
    review with further comments from the membership.

    It is always useful to examine what we are discussing, how we are discussing
    it, and what benefit and risk these discussions may have, so I thank you for
    your comments. More discussion is always welcomed!

    Cheers

    Michael Wishart

    Infexion Connexion Administrator

    Michael Wishart

    CNC Infection Control

    Holy Spirit Northside Private Hospital

    627 Rode Road, Chermside, Qld 4032

    t: (07) 3326 3068 | f: (07) 3607 2226

    e: Michael.Wishart@hsn.org.au

    w:
    http://www.holyspiritnorthside.org.au

    Please consider the environment before printing this email

    Of Cath Murphy

    Hi Marlize

    I’m curious about the question and the responses. As I understand it there
    have been no scientific reports or official Australian public policy
    directives that suggest differentiating between what is available in public
    areas, in the wards where staff perform hand hygiene before feeding patients
    and/or in kitchens or food prep areas. I checked the WHO Guidelines from
    2009 and they also appear to be silent on the issue.

    Given that one of the basic tenets to improve hand hygiene compliance is
    standardisation I would think it wise if you introduced or continued to use
    a neutral liquid soap identical to that used in the settings mentioned
    above. The key points are making sure kitchen staff understand the
    importance of HH as part of food hygiene, that they perform it when needed
    (including when on the ward if potentially exposed) and that their technique
    and wearing of gloves is performed in such a way that the skin on their
    hands is maintained. It would be an education rather than a product issue I
    think.

    As always I am surprised to see brand names mentioned here in the forum
    given its policies and conditions around promotion etc it would be more
    ethical to stick to using generic terms but perhaps the moderator can
    advise. Also my experience would indicate that if you raised the issue of HH
    for kitchen staff your current supplier of HH product would no doubt be able
    to provide you with data and information regarding suitability of their
    product in that setting.

    Good luck and thanks for making me curious 😉

    Cath

    Cathryn Murphy PhD

    Executive Director

    Infection Control Plus Pty Ltd

    http://www.infectioncontrolplus.com.au

    Description: twitter logo
    Description: FB logo
    Description: icp icon

    Of SAWMH.ICC

    Dear All,

    We are currently looking for a alcohol based hand sanitiser to use in our
    Food Service Department. I was wondering what the practices are out there,
    and what product you are using in your Food Service Departments and on your
    food delivering trolleys?

    Thank you and regards

    Marlize Senekal

    Infection Prevention and Control Coordinator

    St. Andrew’s War Memorial Hospital

    457 Wickham Terrace, Spring Hill

    Brisbane

    Ph. 07-3834 4444

    Ext. 4328, Pg. 0328

    _________________________________________________________________

    Uniting Care Health Email Disclaimer: http://www.uchealth.com.au/disclaimer

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do
    not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do
    not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Message protected by MailGuard: e-mail anti-virus, anti-spam and content
    filtering.
    http://www.mailguard.com.au/mg

    Report this message as spam

    WARNING : This email contains information, which is CONFIDENTIAL, and that
    maybe subject to LEGAL PRIVILEGE. This e-mail and any attachments to it (the
    “Communication”) is confidential and is for the use only of the intended
    recipient, and may not duplicated or used by any other party without the
    express consent of the sender. The Communication may contain copyright
    material of St Vincent’s Health & Aged Care(“SVHAC”), or any of its related
    entities or of third parties. If you are not the intended recipient of the
    Communication, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete
    the Communication, and do not read, copy, print, retransmit, store or act in
    reliance on the Communication. Any views expressed in the Communication are
    those of the individual sender only, unless expressly stated to be those of
    SVHAC. SVHAC does not guarantee the integrity of the Communication, or that
    it is free from errors, viruses or interference. Thank-you.

    Message protected by MailGuard: e-mail anti-virus, anti-spam and content
    filtering.
    http://www.mailguard.com.au/mg

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do
    not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do not represent the opinion of ACIPC.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 208 total)