Select Page

Matthias.Maiwald@KKH.COM.SG Subject: Re: Waterless Surgical Scrubs Comments: cc: awidmer@uhbs.ch In-Reply-To:

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Re: Waterless Surgical Scrubs #68399
    Matthias.Maiwald@KKH.COM.SG Subject: Re: Waterless Surgical Scrubs Comments: cc: awidmer@uhbs.ch In-Reply-To:
    Participant

    Author:
    Matthias.Maiwald@KKH.COM.SG Subject: Re: Waterless Surgical Scrubs Comments: cc: awidmer@uhbs.ch In-Reply-To:

    Email:
    B56F71832E0E184F858D40F707833B0D079FE410@server231s.armc.org

    Organisation:

    State:

    Hi Phil,

    Thank you. Alcohol-based surgical hand antisepsis is definitely suitable
    also for the first scrub of the day, not just the subsequent ones. The main
    prerequisite (also stated in the article that you cite) is that the hands
    are clean. In the setting of my surgical internship in the 1908s that I
    described, it was achieved by everyone doing a soap-based hand- and
    arm-wash anyway, followed by drying with a sterile towel (alcohol would not
    act if hands/arms were still wet) before applying alcohol. That got
    everyone to have the ‘baseline’ of clean hands before applying alcohol.
    According to WHO 2009 and the article you cite, that is apparently no
    longer the state of the art, although having clean hands is definitely
    stipulated.

    As stated, there are no clinical trials with infection rates as the outcome
    that show superiority of one regimen over another. In fact, surgical
    scrubbing itself has never been proven in clinical trials. Nevertheless,
    there is a strong microbiological and pathophysiological rationale
    supporting it, as well as anecdotal reports of catastrophic infections when
    there were lapses. Given that microbiological evidence is then the next
    best source (and arguably a very good one, because it relates directly to
    the pathogenetic principle, which is microorganisms on hands), then the
    evidence base for scrubbing with aqueous agents is definitely much weaker
    — by a huge margin — than for alcohol-based scrubbing, and that includes
    the first scrub of the day.

    Best regards, Matthias.


    Matthias Maiwald, MD, FRCPA
    Consultant in Microbiology
    Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
    KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital
    100 Bukit Timah Road
    Singapore 229899
    Tel. +65 6394 1389
    Fax +65 6394 1387

    “RUSSO, Philip”
    To
    Sent by: AICA AICALIST@AICALIST.ORG.AU
    Infexion cc
    Connexion
    Re: Waterless Surgical Scrubs

    10/08/2010 11:26
    AM

    Please respond to
    AICA Infexion
    Connexion

    Nice summary Matthias. We are not aware of any evidence that would
    suggest the first wash of the day in OR be done with anything but soap
    and water. Certainly subsequent to that, but not the first.

    Surgical hand preparation: State of the art.
    Widmer AF, Rotter M, Voss A, Nthumba P, Allegranzi B, Boyce J, Pittet D.
    J Hosp Infect. 2010 Feb;74(2):112-22. Epub 2009 Aug 28. Review.

    Regards
    Phil Russo, M.Clin.Epid
    Hand Hygiene Australia
    National Project Manager
    P: +61 3 9496 3587 | M: +61 411 659 486 |F: +61 3 9496 6677 |E:
    philip.russo@austin.org.au
    http://www.hha.org.au/
    Hand Hygiene Australia, c/- Austin Health Infectious Diseases Dept. PO
    5555 Heidelberg, VIC, Australia 3084

    —–Original Message—–
    Behalf Of Matthias.Maiwald@KKH.COM.SG

    Dear Cath, dear Group,

    “Waterless surgical scrubs” or alcohol-based surgical hand/arm
    antisepsis (as it is better called) has been the standard of care in
    Europe (especially Germany, Austria, Switzerland) for about 30 years or
    longer.
    (In fact, one now retired author describes in a book chapter [Groeschel
    & Pruett, Surgical Antisepsis, in Block 1991] that it has already been
    in use in the 1950s). How it is done (at least in the 80s when did my
    surgical
    internship) is to do a soap-based handwash (plus arms) and to scrub with
    a brush only under fingernails (not on other skin) for the first scrub
    of the day, followed by drying of hands/arms with a sterile towel (not
    paper) and followed by rubbing the alcohol-based hand disinfectant onto
    hands and arms and keeping them ‘wet’ with alcohol for 5 minutes. Then
    letting the alcohol dry (as for a normal alcohol hand rub) before
    gowning and gloving. One of the speakers at the recent Infection Control
    Course in Port Douglas, Andreas Widmer from Switzerland, has been
    presenting on this topic at ICAAC meetings, and it appears that the
    tendency goes towards shorter scrubbing times now (than in the 80s), and
    about 3 min is consideres satisfactory.

    There are two main advantages: (a) it is more gentle to skin, consistent
    with alcohol-based hand antiseptics having emollients, and (b) it
    achieves far greater microbial reduction. While water-based surgical
    scrubbing achieves a microbial reduction typically by about 1-2 log
    (factor 10-100), alcohol-based surgical hand antisepsis achieves about
    3-4 log reduction (factor 1000-10000, that is a factor 10-100 better
    than water-based scrubbing. When agents for persistence are added, then
    there is no or only minimal regrowth of microorganisms under the
    surgical gloves for the duration of the operation. In fact, the lack of
    significant regrowth is assessed as part of the European standard EN
    12791 for surgical hand antiseptics. Note that no aqueous surgical scrub
    stands a chance of passing this stringent testing standard.

    One should mention that there are no clinical trials with surgical
    infection rates as the outcome that show a difference in infection rates
    between water-based and alcohol-based scrubs, however, the much lower
    residual microorganisms provide a strong microbiological and
    pathophysiological rationale that at least there is a greater safety
    margin in case of accidental glove leaks or rupture (which is what
    surgical acrubbing is designed for).

    And yes, there is a section on surgical scrubbing, including alcohol
    formulations, in the new 2009 WHO hand hygiene guideline.

    I would personally strongly advocate NOT to use gels for that purpose,
    because most gels have distinctly less antimicrobial activity than
    liquids, because surface coverage is more difficult to achieve with the
    more viscous gels, and because gels often leave a sticky residue, which
    will be uncomfortable under the surgical gloves. There are a number of
    European companies that have alcohol-based surgical hand antiseptics in
    their product range; they are specially formulated for that purpose and
    pass the stringent EN 12791. Not to make undue advertisements, but among
    the European companies with such products in their range and an
    established distribution network in Australia is B. Braun. (Of course,
    there are several other possibilities with equally good products).

    And yes, TGA should look at approving some of these, in my opinion.

    I do have some literature about this, which I am certainly offering to
    share.

    Best regards, Matthias.


    Matthias Maiwald, MD, FRCPA
    Consultant in Microbiology
    Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine KK Women’s and
    Children’s Hospital 100 Bukit Timah Road Singapore 229899 Tel. +65 6394
    1389 Fax +65 6394 1387

    Cath Murphy

    To
    Sent by: AICA AICALIST@AICALIST.ORG.AU

    Infexion
    cc
    Connexion

    Waterless Surgical Scrubs

    09/08/2010 06:01

    PM

    Please respond to

    AICA Infexion

    Connexion

    Dear AICA, ACSQHC and ACORN Colleagues

    I have been asked about the suitability of using “waterless surgical
    scrubs” as an alternative to the first ‘soap and water’ wash of the day
    in the operating theatre or surgical procedural unit. Does anybody know
    if this is common? Acceptable? Widespread and based on credible evidence
    or policy?

    Any commentary welcomed. Thanks.

    Cath

    Assoc. Prof Cathryn Murphy RN PhD CIC
    CNC Infection Control
    Gold Coast Health Service District
    Robina Hospital
    Gold Coast

    http://www.icp.au.com

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and
    do not represent the opinion of AICA.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a
    new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’
    (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    ————————————————————————
    —–
    The information contained in this e-mail or in any attachment is
    confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended
    recipient, you are not authorised to read, print, retain, copy,
    disseminate, distribute, or use this e-mail or any part thereof. If you
    receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by
    e-mail and delete all copies of this e-mail. All opinions, conclusions
    and other information expressed in this e-mail that are not of an
    official nature shall not be deemed as given or endorsed by KK Women’s &
    Children’s Hospital.

    Insofar as this e-mail contains any medical opinion or advice, the
    medical opinion or advice is premised solely on the extent of medical
    information available to the writer of this e-mail and, where
    applicable, qualified by the lack of direct physical assessment and
    personal evaluation of the patient. Any medical opinion or advice
    expressed in this email does not necessarily represent the views of KK
    Women’s & Children’s Hospital.

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and
    do not represent the opinion of AICA.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a
    new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’
    (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au
    *****************************************************************

    Listen to Professor Anne Buist on perinatal depression at
    http://www.austin.org.au/podcasts

    *****************************************************************

    This email contains confidential information intended
    only for the person named above and may be subject to
    legal privilege and confidentiality obligations imposed
    by legislation or be subject to intellectual property
    protection or copyright. If you are not the intended recipient,
    any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of this transmission
    is prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
    please notify us immediately by return email and delete the
    original email and any attachments.
    Austin Health provides no guarantee that this transmission
    is free of virus or that it has not been intercepted or altered.

    *****************************************************************

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do
    not represent the opinion of AICA.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives
    registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new
    message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to
    aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without
    the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    —————————————————————————–
    The information contained in this e-mail or in any attachment is
    confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient,
    you are not authorised to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate,
    distribute, or use this e-mail or any part thereof. If you receive this
    e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
    all copies of this e-mail. All opinions, conclusions and other information
    expressed in this e-mail that are not of an official nature shall not be
    deemed as given or endorsed by KK Women’s & Children’s Hospital.

    Insofar as this e-mail contains any medical opinion or advice, the medical
    opinion or advice is premised solely on the extent of medical information
    available to the writer of this e-mail and, where applicable, qualified by
    the lack of direct physical assessment and personal evaluation of the
    patient. Any medical opinion or advice expressed in this email does not
    necessarily represent the views of KK Women’s & Children’s Hospital.

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do not represent the opinion of AICA.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)