Home › Forums › Infexion Connexion › Infection control and VRE
- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 13 years, 5 months ago by
Wishart, Michael.
-
AuthorPosts
-
03/03/2011 at 11:38 am #68567
[Cross posted from ASID OzBug list with permission – I will share replies with David Gordon- Moderator]
________________________________________
This may be a heretical question but I would be interested in views on the value of screening and control programs for VRE.
Currently we have, along I presume with many hospitals, moderate endemic levels of VRE (560 cases last year versus none in 2007). There has been a lot of attempts initially at control including screening and contact tracing, as well as hand hygiene and cleaning issue (only partly successful). Screening has reduced somewhat (only immediate bay contacts if patient still in) and some entry/exit screening in ICU and monthly surveillance in high risk areas like renal and gastro.
It is likely that what we detect is only a (unknown) proportion of the pool of VRE in the hospital. Patients transferred from Flinders to Repat Hospital for various reasons are screened and around 15% are positive, suggesting quite a pool of unknown VRE carriers, although the transferred patients might be higher risk than the general patient population.
Detection of VRE causes many logistical problems and costs including further screening, huge bed pressures and blocks, problems for theatres/ radiology etc. Cost is hard to quantitate but would be huge.When VRE first appeared we sought but failed to get support for intensive control when it might have been possible.
Now it is endemic, there is a likely considerable pool of “unknowns”, patients are coming with it from other hospitals and perhaps even the community, current control efforts are not too successful (maybe partly a reflection on overall infection control practices and cleaning/antibiotics),huge bed pressure and other problems managing colonised patients and in the context that only a very small number of colonised patients have infection, is it time to abandon these efforts of screening and isolation and accept that widespread transmission occurs. The money save might be better spent enhancing cleaning/general hand hygiene or employing another ID consultant!
Thanks for any comments,
Regards
DavidProf David Gordon
Head of Micro and Infectious Diseases
Flinders Medical Centre, SA PathologyThis e-mail message and any accompanying files may contain
information that is confidential and subject to privilege. If you
are not the intended recipient, and have received the e-mail
in error, you are notified that any use, dissemination,
distribution, forwarding, printing or copying of the message
and any attached files is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this e-mail message in error please immediately
advise the sender by return e-mail, or telephone 1800 243 903.
You must destroy the original transmission and its contents.
Any views expressed within this communication are those of
the individual sender, except where the sender specifically
states them to be the views of Ramsay Health Care.
This communication should not be copied or disseminated
without permission.
————————————————————————Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do not represent the opinion of AICA.
Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.
Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au
To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.
You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Infexion Connexion’ is closed to new topics and replies.