Select Page

Fwd: [asid-ozbug] Bungs on PICCs

Home Forums Infexion Connexion Fwd: [asid-ozbug] Bungs on PICCs

 | Click to Receive Email Notifications of Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #68535
    Avatar photoMichael Wishart
    Participant

    Author:
    Michael Wishart

    Position:
    Infection Control Coordinator

    Organisation:
    St Vincent's Private Hospital Northside

    State:
    QLD

    _______________________________________________
    asid-ozbug mailing list
    asid-ozbug@burnet.edu.au
    http://malbec.burnet.edu.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asid-ozbug
    ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
    Edited archives of most past OZBUG/ASPID/AICA topic discussions are available at the Healthcare infection control special interest group (HICSIG) wiki – http://www.hicsiganz.org. Use the left menu item to link to ‘AICA OZBUG talk’ or Search by a key word(s).
    ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do not represent the opinion of AICA.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Michael Wishart
    Infection Control Coordinator
    St Vincent's Private Hospital Northside & St Vincent's Private Hospital Brisbane
    Brisbane, QLD
    michael.wishart@svha.org.au

    #68546
    Cath Murphy
    Participant

    Author:
    Cath Murphy

    Position:

    Organisation:

    State:

    In addition to other comments provided I would refer AICA List users to this InN Press article soon to be published in AJIC. Hopefully it adds further clarity regarding these devices.

    Btaiche, I. F., D. S. Kovacevich, et al. “The effects of needleless connectors on catheter-related bloodstream infections.” American Journal of Infection Control In Press, Corrected Proof.
    Needleless connectors, including the standard split septum and the luer-activated mechanical valve connectors, have been introduced into clinical practice to eliminate the risk of needlestick injuries by avoiding the use of needles when accessing the intravascular catheters. Negative and positive displacement mechanical valves have been associated with increased rates of catheter-related bloodstream infections as compared with split septum connectors. Based on available data, split septum connectors should be preferentially used instead of mechanical valves. Adequate disinfection by scrubbing the access port preferably with chlorhexidine is recommended to minimize the risk of catheter microbial contamination along with proper infection control practices. Large prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to evaluate further the possible causes and effects of different types of mechanical valve needleless connectors on bloodstream infections.

    Assoc. Prof Cathryn Murphy RN PhD CIC
    Managing Director
    Infection Control Plus Pty Ltd
    PO Box 106
    West Burleigh 4219
    Queensland
    AUSTRALIA
    Ph +61 7 5520 1569
    Fax + 61 7 5520 1476
    Mob +61 428 154 154
    http://www.icp.au.com

    From: AICA Infexion Connexion [mailto:AICALIST@AICALIST.ORG.AU] On Behalf Of Michael Wishart
    Sent: Monday, 24 January 2011 17:13
    To: AICALIST@AICALIST.ORG.AU
    Subject: [AICA_Infexion_Connexion] Fwd: [asid-ozbug] Bungs on PICCs

    [Cross-posted from OzBug with permission on behalf of Tony Allworth – Moderator. I will copy any list replies to him]
    A question has been raised that I would appreciated consolidated opinion on (I expect total consensus as usual): We have traditionally left the positive displacement valves (“bungs”) on PICCs from the time they go in unless there is obvious blood build-up or other contamination. The basis of this is to maintain a closed system to minimise infection. It has been pointed out that the positive displacement valves according to the manufacturer should be changed either after a certain number of accesses or time frame eg 3 days. When asked for the rationale for this no answer has been forthcoming. I can find no help in the literature. I am concerned that changing them “routinely” will compromise the microbial integrity of the system.

    What do others do, and think we should be advising?

    Cheers,

    Tony Allworth

    Dr Tony Allworth
    Director, Infectious Diseases
    Royal Brisbane & Women’s Hospital

    (No vested interest in PICCs or bungs)

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do not represent the opinion of AICA.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do not represent the opinion of AICA.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (withou

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • The forum ‘Infexion Connexion’ is closed to new topics and replies.