Home › Forums › Infexion Connexion › FW: Cleaning audits using ultraviolet marker assessments versus audits using the Cleaning standards for Victorian health facilities 2009
- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 8 years, 9 months ago by Michael Wishart.
-
AuthorPosts
-
01/02/2016 at 10:03 am #72720Michael WishartParticipant
Author:
Michael WishartEmail:
Michael.Wishart@svha.org.auOrganisation:
State:
NSW[Re-sent with attachment, thanks Glenys! – Moderator]
Dear All,
I would like to flag your attention the recently published article by one of our peers, Elizabeth Gillespie and her colleagues from Southern Health in Victoria.
* Gillespie E et al. The role of ultraviolet marker assessments in demonstrating cleaning efficacy. American Journal of Infection Control 43 (2015) 1347-9 – attached.
This study is important as:
* It was conducted in a number of hospitals.
* It supports the need not only for cleaning audits but also cleaning monitoring (i.e. on this occasion the utilisation of an ultraviolet marker).
* It demonstrates that visual auditing alone is inadequate to determine if a room has been cleaned or not cleaned appropriately – See Compliance percentages in Table 1 for both “Terminal and Daily Cleaning” and
[NB not sure this data will format correctly: refer to attached paper – Moderator]
Table 1
Results of UVM compared with visual auditing for November 2014
Site UVM compliance for terminal cleaning and daily cleaning, % Internal visual audit results, %
Hospital A Terminal: 58 97.5
Daily: 20
Hospital B Terminal: 65 85.9
Daily: 58
Hospital C Terminal: 70 97.4
Daily: 38
Hospital D Terminal: no discharges 95.2
Daily: 65
Hospital E Terminal: 90 98
Daily: no discharges* It demonstrates ongoing issues health facilities face in terms of sustaining compliance with cleaning and disinfection practices.
Regards
Glenys
Glenys Harrington
Consultant
Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)
PO Box 5202
Middle Park
Victoria, 3206
Australia
M: +61 404 816 434
infexion@ozemail.com.au
ABN 47533508426MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.
The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.
Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.
Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au
To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.
You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au
01/02/2016 at 10:05 am #72723Michael WishartParticipantAuthor:
Michael WishartEmail:
Michael.Wishart@svha.org.auOrganisation:
State:
NSWHmm, still no attachment…. Trying again!!
Michael Wishart
Infection Control CoordinatorA 627 Rode Road, Chermside QLD 4032
P (07) 3326 3068 | F (07) 3607 2226 | E michael.wishart@svha.org.au | W http://www.hsnph.org.au
[cid:image001.png@01D01926.61F1C2B0]
P Please consider the environment before printing this email[Re-sent with attachment, thanks Glenys! – Moderator]
Dear All,
I would like to flag your attention the recently published article by one of our peers, Elizabeth Gillespie and her colleagues from Southern Health in Victoria.
* Gillespie E et al. The role of ultraviolet marker assessments in demonstrating cleaning efficacy. American Journal of Infection Control 43 (2015) 1347-9 – attached.
This study is important as:
* It was conducted in a number of hospitals.
* It supports the need not only for cleaning audits but also cleaning monitoring (i.e. on this occasion the utilisation of an ultraviolet marker).
* It demonstrates that visual auditing alone is inadequate to determine if a room has been cleaned or not cleaned appropriately – See Compliance percentages in Table 1 for both “Terminal and Daily Cleaning” and
[NB not sure this data will format correctly: refer to attached paper – Moderator]
Table 1
Results of UVM compared with visual auditing for November 2014
Site UVM compliance for terminal cleaning and daily cleaning, % Internal visual audit results, %
Hospital A Terminal: 58 97.5
Daily: 20
Hospital B Terminal: 65 85.9
Daily: 58
Hospital C Terminal: 70 97.4
Daily: 38
Hospital D Terminal: no discharges 95.2
Daily: 65
Hospital E Terminal: 90 98
Daily: no discharges* It demonstrates ongoing issues health facilities face in terms of sustaining compliance with cleaning and disinfection practices.
Regards
Glenys
Glenys Harrington
Consultant
Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)
PO Box 5202
Middle Park
Victoria, 3206
Australia
M: +61 404 816 434
infexion@ozemail.com.au
ABN 47533508426______________________________________________________________________
For the purposes of protecting the integrity and security of the SVHA network and the information held on it, all emails to and from any email address on the “svha.org.au” domain (or any other domain of St Vincent’s Health Australia Limited or any of its related bodies corporate) (an “SVHA Email Address”) will pass through and be scanned by the Symantec.cloud anti virus and anti spam filter service. These services may be provided by Symantec from locations outside of Australia and, if so, this will involve any email you send to or receive from an SVHA Email Address being sent to and scanned in those locations.______________________________________________________________________
For the purposes of protecting the integrity and security of the SVHA network and the information held on it, all emails to and from any email address on the “svha.org.au” domain (or any other domain of St Vincent’s Health Australia Limited or any of its related bodies corporate) (an “SVHA Email Address”) will pass through and be scanned by the Symantec.cloud anti virus and anti spam filter service. These services may be provided by Symantec from locations outside of Australia and, if so, this will involve any email you send to or receive from an SVHA Email Address being sent to and scanned in those locations.
MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.
Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.
Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au
To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.
You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au
MESSAGES POSTED TO THIS LIST ARE SOLELY THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF ACIPC.
The use of trade/product/commercial brand names through the list is discouraged by ACIPC. If you wish to discuss specific reference to products or services by brand or commercial names, please do this outside the list.
Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.
Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au
To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.
You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Infexion Connexion’ is closed to new topics and replies.