Select Page

Disinfection requirements for glidescope using disposable baldes

Home Forums Infexion Connexion Disinfection requirements for glidescope using disposable baldes

 | Click to Receive Email Notifications of Posts
  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #68538
    Ruth Barratt
    Participant

    Author:
    Ruth Barratt

    Position:

    Organisation:

    State:

    Hi all,

    I would appreciate input for this query from my cross-Tasman colleagues.

    I am currently working in an acute care tertiary hospital and the
    emergency department has recently purchased a new videolaryngoscope –
    The Glidescope. It has a digital camera incorporated in the blade which
    displays a view of the vocal cords on a monitor. This instrument has
    been on the market for a number of years originating from Canada. I am
    told that some Australian facilities uses it too.

    The model we have purchased uses a single use blade that fits snugly
    (clicks into place) and is totally enclosed. – that is there is no
    opening in the plastic blade at the end.

    My question is for any one that is familiar with this piece of
    equipment. Are you satisfied that the single use blades negate the need
    to high-level disinfect the video baton that inserts into these blades.
    The product rep suggests that routine high-level disinfection of the
    baton is not required between cases and that the baton need only be
    wiped down with detergent and a 70% alcohol wipe if necessary. The baton
    is capable of being high-level disinfected if it is visibly contaminated
    but this is not usually undertaken routinely.

    Apparently it is routine practice worldwide to accept the single use
    blades as an adequate precaution to prevent cross infection between
    patients.

    Any opinions or advice would be appreciated.

    Regards

    Ruth

    Ruth Barratt

    Clinical Nurse Specialist – Infection Prevention and Control

    Christchurch Hospital

    New Zealand

    *************************************************************************************************************
    Check out our web site: http://www.cdhb.govt.nz

    This email and attachments have been scanned for content and viruses and is believed to be clean
    This email or attachments may contain confidential or legally privileged information intended for the
    sole use of the addressee(s). Any use, redistribution, disclosure, or reproduction of this message,
    except as intended, is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please notify the sender and
    remove all copies of the message, including any attachments. Any views or opinions expressed in
    this email (unless otherwise stated) may not represent those of Canterbury District Health Board

    ***************************************************************************************************************

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do not represent the opinion of AICA.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

    #68539
    Wishart, Michael
    Participant

    Author:
    Wishart, Michael

    Position:

    Organisation:

    State:

    Hi Ruth

    We looked at some similar devices here, and I was concerned that these devices use a ‘sheath’, which means the device part covered by the sheath (that enters mucous membrane area) would need high level disinfection between uses. Never really resolved this, as manufacturer stated it was not a sheath, so we were all set to do some clinical testing of contamination of the device under the hard plastic cover in use, when the doctors decided to buy a difference scope that was fully sterilisable, so we dropped the whole thing.

    I had mixed opinions from colleagues about this when I posted to this list in March last year, so will be interested in further comments here. You can see that thread if you search ‘sheath’ in the website archives.

    Cheers
    Michael

    Michael Wishart | GPH – Infection Control Coordinator

    GPH – Quality & Safety Unit (Infection Control) | Greenslopes Private Hospital
    Newdegate Street, Greenslopes QLD 4120
    t: 07 3394 7919 | f: 07 3394 7985
    e: WishartM@ramsayhealth.com.au | w: http://www.ramsayhealth.com.au

    Ramsay Health Care is an environmentally responsible corporation, please consider the environment before printing this email.
    ________________________________________

    Hi all,
    I would appreciate input for this query from my cross-Tasman colleagues.

    I am currently working in an acute care tertiary hospital and the emergency department has recently purchased a new videolaryngoscope – The Glidescope. It has a digital camera incorporated in the blade which displays a view of the vocal cords on a monitor. This instrument has been on the market for a number of years originating from Canada. I am told that some Australian facilities uses it too.

    The model we have purchased uses a single use blade that fits snugly (clicks into place) and is totally enclosed. – that is there is no opening in the plastic blade at the end.

    My question is for any one that is familiar with this piece of equipment. Are you satisfied that the single use blades negate the need to high-level disinfect the video baton that inserts into these blades. The product rep suggests that routine high-level disinfection of the baton is not required between cases and that the baton need only be wiped down with detergent and a 70% alcohol wipe if necessary. The baton is capable of being high-level disinfected if it is visibly contaminated but this is not usually undertaken routinely.

    Apparently it is routine practice worldwide to accept the single use blades as an adequate precaution to prevent cross infection between patients.

    Any opinions or advice would be appreciated.

    Regards

    Ruth

    Ruth Barratt
    Clinical Nurse Specialist – Infection Prevention and Control
    Christchurch Hospital
    New Zealand

    This e-mail message and any accompanying files may contain
    information that is confidential and subject to privilege. If you
    are not the intended recipient, and have received the e-mail
    in error, you are notified that any use, dissemination,
    distribution, forwarding, printing or copying of the message
    and any attached files is strictly prohibited. If you have
    received this e-mail message in error please immediately
    advise the sender by return e-mail, or telephone 1800 243 903.
    You must destroy the original transmission and its contents.
    Any views expressed within this communication are those of
    the individual sender, except where the sender specifically
    states them to be the views of Ramsay Health Care.
    This communication should not be copied or disseminated
    without permission.
    ————————————————————————

    Messages posted to this list are solely the opinion of the authors, and do not represent the opinion of AICA.

    Archive of all messages are available at http://aicalist.org.au/archives – registration and login required.

    Replies to this message will be directed back to the list. To create a new message send an email to aicalist@aicalist.org.au

    To send a message to the list administrator send an email to aicalist-request@aicalist.org.au.

    You can unsubscribe from this list be sending ‘signoff aicalist’ (without the quotes) to listserv@aicalist.org.au

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • The forum ‘Infexion Connexion’ is closed to new topics and replies.